Skip to main content

Table 5 Mediation by financial-related discrimination on the longitudinal associations between wealth (poorest vs. richest) and psychological well-being related measures (n = 8,988)

From: Financial-related discrimination and socioeconomic inequalities in psychological well-being related measures: a longitudinal study

Path

Wave 6

Wave 7

Point estimate

95% CI

Effect ratio (%)

Point estimate

95% CI

Effect ratio (%)

Depressive symptoms

      

Wealth → financial-related discrimination

(IV to M, path a)

OR = 1.813***

1.373, 2.392

 

OR = 1.813***

1.373, 2.392

 

Financial-related discrimination → depressive symptoms

(M to DV, path b)

β = 0.173**

0.073, 0.274

 

β = 0.223***

0.112, 0.334

 

Wealth → depressive symptoms

(total effect, path c)

β = 0.183***

0.128, 0.239

 

β = 0.182***

0.125, 0.239

 

Wealth → depressive symptoms

(direct effect, path c’)

β = 0.177***

0.122, 0.232

 

β = 0.174***

0.116, 0.231

 

Wealth → depressive symptoms

(indirect effect)

β = 0.006*

0.001, 0.011

3.28

β = 0.008*

0.002, 0.014

4.40

Enjoyment of life

      

Wealth → financial-related discrimination

(IV to M, path a)

OR = 1.812***

1.371, 2.395

 

OR = 1.812***

1.371, 2.395

 

Financial-related discrimination → enjoyment of life

(M to DV, path b)

β= -0.160**

-0.255, -0.065

 

β= -0.116*

-0.215, -0.018

 

Wealth → enjoyment of life

(total effect, path c)

β= -0.144***

-0.193, -0.095

 

β= -0.164***

-0.221, -0.107

 

Wealth → enjoyment of life

(direct effect, path c’)

β= -0.138***

-0.187, -0.089

 

β= -0.160***

-0.217, -0.103

 

Wealth → enjoyment of life

(indirect effect)

β= -0.006*

-0.011, -0.001

4.17

β= -0.004

-0.008, 0.000

2.44

Loneliness

NA

     

Wealth → financial-related discrimination

(IV to M, path a)

   

OR = 1.816***

1.375, 2.398

 

Financial-related discrimination → loneliness

(M to DV, path b)

   

β = 0.136**

0.037, 0.234

 

Wealth → loneliness

(total effect, path c)

   

β = 0.063*

0.010, 0.116

 

Wealth → loneliness

(direct effect, path c’)

   

β = 0.058*

0.005, 0.111

 

Wealth → loneliness

(indirect effect)

   

β = 0.005*

0.000, 0.009

7.94

  1. OR = odds ratio; β = regression coefficient; CI = confidence intervals; IV = independent variable; M = mediator; DV = dependent variable; NA = not applicable as the associations between either (1) wealth and psychological well-being or (2) financial-related discrimination and psychological well-being were not statistically significant
  2. The effect ratio was calculated as indirect effect divided by total effect
  3. Separate mediation models were developed for each psychological well-being related measure. All the associations were adjusted for baseline psychological well-being and sociodemographic covariates (age, sex, ethnicity, marital status, education level, employment status, and presence of limiting illness)
  4. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001