Skip to main content
Download PDF

Trends, prevalence and associated factors of obesity among adults in a rural community in Thailand: serial cross-sectional surveys, 2012 and 2018

BMC Public Health volume 20, Article number: 850 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Obesity is one principle risk factor increasing the risk of noncommunicable diseases including diabetes, hypertension and atherosclerosis. In Thailand, a 2014 study reported obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) in a Thai population aged ≥15 years was 37.5, 32.9 and 41.8% overall and among males and females, respectively. The study aimed to determine trends in the prevalence of obesity among adults residing in a Thai rural community between 2012 and 2018 and investigate the associations between obesity and behavioral factors.

Methods

Serial cross-sectional studies were conducted in 2012 and 2018 among adults in Na-Ngam rural community. In 2012 and 2018, all 635 and 627 individuals, respectively, were interviewed using structured questionnaires related to demographics, risk behaviors, comorbidities and arthrometric measurement. Spot urine was collected by participants and obesity was defined as BMI ≥25 kg/m2. The risk factors for obesity were analyzed in the 2018 survey.

Results

A total of 1262 adults in Na-Ngam rural community were included in the study. The prevalence of obesity was 33.9% in 2012 and 44.8% in 2018 (P < 0.001). The average BMI increased from 23.9 ± 4.2 kg/m2 in 2012 to 25.0 ± 4.52 kg/m2 in 2018 (P < 0.001). Obesity was associated with higher age (AOR 0.99; 95%CI 0.97–0.99), smoking (AOR 0.52; 95%CI 0.28–0.94), instant coffee-mix consumption > 1 cup/week (AOR 1.44; 95%CI 1.02–2.04), higher number of chronic diseases (≥1 disease AOR 1.82; 95%CI 1.01–2.68, > 2 diseases AOR 2.15; 95%CI 1.32–3.50), and higher spot urine sodium level (AOR 1.002; 95%CI 0.99–1.01).

Conclusion

Our data emphasized that obesity constituted a serious problem among adults residing in a rural community. A trend in significant increase was found regarding the prevalence of obesity and average BMI in the rural community over 6 years. Effective public health interventions should be provided at the community level to reduce BMI. Moreover, modifiable risk factors for obesity should be attenuated to inhibit the progression of metabolic syndrome, noncommunicable diseases and their complications.

Peer Review reports

Background

The prevalence of overweight status and obesity has been increasing both among males and females worldwide [1, 2]. Globally, in 2013, the estimated prevalence of adults with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 totaled 36.9% among males and 38.0% among females [2]. In Thailand, the Thai National Health Examination Surveys V (NHES V) reported the prevalence of obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) in a Thai population aged ≥15 years in 2014 was 37.5, 32.9 and 41.8% overall and among males and females, respectively [3].

Obesity is one principle risk factor leading to noncommunicable diseases including diabetes and hypertension [4, 5]. Additionally, obesity was confirmed to precipitate cardiovascular diseases, especially atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) [6, 7]. One recent report showed a low association between obesity and myocardial infarction, a moderate association with stroke and a high association with high blood pressure [8]. Thus, when the process of obesity is interrupted, these complications will be terminated. In addition, some dietary behaviors associated with obesity include salt intake and coffee consumption [9]. Related studies have reported an association between urine sodium levels as a proxy for salt intake, increasing BMI and metabolic syndrome [10, 11]. However, only limited information is available on factors potentially responsible for obesity among adults in a remote rural community, and the required information is essential to focus on preventing problems. Decreasing BMI will help to reduce cardiovascular risks and any complications. The present study was conducted directly in a rural population and reported trends in the prevalence of obesity among adults residing in a Thai rural community in 2012 and 2018. In addition, we investigated the associations of obesity and behavioral factors including urine sodium level.

Methods

Study design and subjects

This study was conducted in a rural community in central Thailand, 160 km from Bangkok: Na-Ngam rural community in Chachoengsao Province. The remote rural community houses approximately 1200 people. A serial cross-sectional study was conducted in September 2012 and December 2018. A total survey was used to collect information from the target population [12]. All 635 adults in 2012 and 627 adults in 2018 were interviewed. Inclusion criteria of the study comprised adults aged ≥20 years. People were excluded from the study when they did not reside in Na-Ngam community while the study was conducted.

This study was reviewed and approved by the Royal Thai Army Medical Department Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants with the WMA Declaration of Helsinki–Ethics principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Data collection

The participants informed consent in Thai was obtained before participating in the study. The interviewers were well-trained before interviewing the participants. Face-to-face interviews were conducted using standardized questionnaires to obtain the information from the participants. One participant spent approximately 30 min to provide complete information.

Measures

Standardized questionnaires, developed by the researchers for this study, covered information on demographics including sex, age, marital status, educational level, and occupation [see Additional file 1]. Self-reported information included diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidemia, exercise, smoking, alcohol consumption and instant coffee-mix consumption. A history of exercise was obtained using standardized questionnaires asking about the duration of daily or weekly physical activity, e.g., during the last 12 months, on how many days per week did you exercise? and how many minutes daily do you usually spend on one of those days?). Smoking was defined as those who currently smoked (within the last 12 months) and never smoked (patients who had never smoked, or who had smoked less than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime) [13]. Alcohol consumption was defined as those consuming within last 12 months and no alcohol consumption, i.e., those who never drank in their lifetime. Ex-smoker and ex-drinker were defined by smoke-free and alcohol-free for 12 months, respectively. Instant coffee-mix was defined as instant coffee mixed with milk and sugar ingredients. The number of cups consumed was calculated using questions about the number of cups daily, and weekly. Instant coffee-mix consumption behavior was computed as the median frequency of intake, in cups weekly. The number of cups weekly was categorized as: (1) ≤ 1 cup/week and (2) > 1 cup/week. A history of sugar-sweetened beverages consumption was obtained using standardized questionnaires asking about the number of cups daily, and weekly. Sugar-sweetened beverages consumption behavior was computed as the median frequency of intake, in cups weekly. The number of cups weekly was categorized as: (1) ≤ 1 cup/week and (2) > 1 cup/week. Body weight and height were measured using calibrated balance scales (to the nearest 0.1 kg) and stadiometer (to the nearest 0.1 cm), respectively (DETECTO, St. Webb City, MO, USA). BMI was calculated as body weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg)/(m2). BMI was classified in five groups, i.e., < 18.5 kg/m2, 18.5 to 22.9 kg/m2, 23.0 to 24.9 kg/m2, 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2 and ≥ 30 kg/m2. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥25 kg/m2 [14]. The participants received a 60 ml. capacity screw cap container to store the collected urine, and participants were required to void the bladder. This first-pass urine was discarded. The urine passed thereafter was collected in the container provided approximately 40 ml. All urine samples were sent to a central laboratory within 6 h. Urinary sodium levels were measured using the VITROS 5,1 FS analyzer (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Neckargemünd, Germany). Urinary sodium was measured at the central laboratory for all urine samples of the participants.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Demographic data of participants were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Prevalence of obesity was calculated and presented as a percentage with 95% confident interval (95% CI). Student’s t-test was applied to compare continuous data while categorical data were compared with chi-square test. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to analyze the changes in the BMI level and obesity for 97 individuals who were participated both in 2012 and 2018. Multivariable analysis was performed using logistic regression analysis to determine factors associated with obesity. The magnitude of association was reported as adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% CI. Statistical significance was considered for p-value less than 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of the study participants

A total of 1262 adults in Na-Ngam rural community were included in the study, 635 participants in 2012, and 627 participants in 2018. In all, 97 subjects who participated in 2012 and 2018. The average age of participants was 48.9 ± 14.6 years and 54.9 ± 13.6 years in 2012 and 2018, respectively. Most participants graduated from primary school. Agriculture was the major occupation of the participants both in 2012 and 2018. Descriptive characteristics of the study participants by year are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of participants
Full size table

Prevalence of obesity among adults in a rural community

In 2012, the overall average BMI among adults was 23.9 ± 4.2 kg/m2, while the overall prevalence of obesity was 33.7% (95%CI 30.2–37.6). The prevalence of obesity among females was 47.1%, while it totaled 24.2% among males. Figure 1 shows the prevalence of obesity among adults in 2012 stratified by age groups and sex. In 2018, the overall average BMI among adults was 25.0 ± 4.5 kg/m2, while the overall prevalence of obesity was 44.8% (95%CI 40.9–48.7). Among males, the prevalence of obesity was found at 32.7%, while the prevalence of obesity among females was 51.1%. Figure 2 illustrates the prevalence of obesity among adults in a rural community stratified by age groups and sex in 2018. The prevalence of obesity between participants with indoor occupation and outdoor occupation was equal, accounting for 45.9%.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Prevalence of obesity among adults in a rural community in Thailand by age groups, 2012

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Prevalence of obesity among adults in a rural community in Thailand by age groups, 2018

Full size image

Trends in prevalence of obesity among adults in a rural community

Fig. 3 shows the trend in the prevalence of obesity stratified by sex in 2012 and 2018. The overall prevalence of obesity among adults increased significantly (p < 0.001); similarly, the prevalence of obesity among males and females significantly rose from 2012 to 2018. Figure 4 illustrates the average BMI in 2012 and 2018 revealing that BMI increased from 23.9 ± 4.2 kg/m2 in 2012 to 25.0 ± 4.5 kg/m2 in 2018 (p < 0.001). The average BMI increased both among males and females at 0.7 kg/m2 and 1.1 kg/m2 over 6 years, respectively. Figure 5 shows the proportion of BMI groups among adults comparing 2012 and 2018. In 2018, the proportion of BMI groups including 23.0 to 24.9 kg/m2, 25.0 to 29.0 kg/m2 and ≥ 30 kg/m2 increased in which the proportion of BMI ≥30 rose by 3.7% over 6 years. In all, 97 participants who enrolled in 2012 and 2018.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Trends in prevalence of obesity stratified by sex in a rural community in Thailand, 2012 and 2018

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Average BMI among adults in a rural community in Thailand, 2012 and 2018

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Proportion of BMI groups among adults in a rural community in Thailand, 2012 and 2018

Full size image

The repeated measurement analysis shows a significant increase in BMI level of the 97 individuals who participated both in 2012 and 2018 (p = 0.006).

Associated factors of obesity among adults in a rural community in 2018

An additional table shows that univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with obesity [see Additional file 2]. After adjusting for potential confounders, factors associated with obesity included smoking, instant coffee-mix consumption, spot urine sodium level and number of chronic diseases. Table 2 illustrates that the prevalence of obesity tended to be lower with older age adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.99; 95% CI 0.97–0.99). The prevalence of obesity among current smoker was lower than that of those who never smoked (AOR 0.52; 95% CI 0.28–0.94). Adults who consumed instant coffee-mix > 1 cup weekly tended to be at high risk for obesity compared with those who consumed ≤1 cup weekly (AOR 1.44; 95% CI 1.02–2.04). We found that increasing levels of spot urine sodium were not significantly associated with obesity among adults in a rural community (AOR 1.002; 95% CI 0.99–1.01). The increase in the number of chronic diseases of participants was associated with obesity as a dose response relationship (AOR 1.82; 95% CI 1.01–2.68 and AOR 2.15; 95% CI 1.32–3.50, respectively.

Table 2 Multivariable analysis factors associated with obesity among adults in a rural community in 2018 (n = 627)
Full size table

Discussion

This study constitutes a recent epidemiological study of obesity prevalence and associated factors for obesity among adults residing in a Thai rural community. These data provide essential evidence of the rising trend in the prevalence of obesity among adults residing in a rural community in 2012 and in 2018. Additionally, the study in 2018 illustrates the association between obesity and behavioral factors including comorbidities. Compared with the Thai NHES V in 2014 [3], the present study showed that obesity prevalence was higher, not only overall among adults, but higher than that in related reports among both males and females. Among females, the prevalence of obesity was significantly higher than that among males; comparatively, from a few related studies in Thailand [3, 15] and other countries, e.g., India [16], also indicating a high obesity prevalence among females. However, several studies in China [17, 18] and Lao PDR [19] reported that the prevalence of obesity among males was higher than that among females.

The prevalence of obesity among adults residing in a Thai rural community in 2012 and in 2018 significantly increased with an average BMI from 2012 to 2018. Additionally, we used repeated measurement among 97 individuals who participated in both 2012 and 2018. The results illustrated that BMI level significantly increased over 6 years. This finding was similar to the 2014 report indicating the global mean BMI rose among males and females [20]. Moreover, the average increase in BMI in the study was higher than that of the global increase among males and females accounting for 0.63 kg/m2 per decade and 0.58 kg/m2 per decade, respectively [20]. The phenomenon can be explained in that Thai society has transformed continuously to a more industrial society. Moreover, the number of rural areas has transformed continuously to urban regions resulting in economic development and decreased poverty levels in Thailand [21]. Thus, people can more easily access processed industrialized foods with a high in energy density foods leading to obesity [22, 23].

We found that, the prevalence of obesity increased with age, peaking at 50 to 59 years, and dropping at age more than 60 years. Similarly, related studies in China illustrated that the prevalence of obesity was higher among middle-aged people and decreased among older people [18]. Compared with other countries in Asia, the increase in BMI and prevalence of obesity in the present study was synchronous with the findings of other Asian countries, including Indonesia [24] and Korea [25]. Similarly, the recent study of Hatthachote et al. found a continuous increasing trend in prevalence of obesity among young Thai men over 8 years [26]. Obesity was confirmed as a potential risk factor for noncommunicable and ASCVD [4,5,6,7] When high BMI and obesity continue to progress, the prevalence of patients with noncommunicable diseases and their complications are more likely to increase. Thus, effective public health interventions should be implemented in the community to prohibit increased BMI.

The present study found that smoking behavior was associated with obesity. The participants who currently smoked were less likely to be obese when compared with adults who never smoked. The finding was consistent with related studies in Thailand that reported that smokers tended to have lower BMI than nonsmokers [27]. Similarly, recent large studies on the relationship between smoking and obesity conducted in the UK and Japan found that overall current smokers were less likely to be obese than those who had never smoked [28, 29]. This phenomenon can be explained by the effects of nicotine administration which involving the major appetite-suppressing component of tobacco; moreover, nicotine may act on the neural regulators of feeding [30]. Another explanation for the observation was that nicotine intake may stimulate the metabolic rate as the primary mechanism rather than diminish energy intake due to appetite suppression among smokers [31]. Although smoking can decrease obesity, it remains a serious health hazard for other issues including coronary heart disease and should be prevented for those reasons [32, 33].

We found that compared with participants consuming instant coffee-mix ≤1 cup weekly, participants who consumed > 1 cup weekly were more likely to be obese. Similarly, a recent study in Korea reported that high coffee consumption was positively associated with obesity as measured by BMI [9]. Additionally, the instant coffee-mix intakes were positively correlated with serum triglyceride level [34]. The finding can be explained by the high sugar level contained in the instant coffee-mix, directly increasing body weight and body fat accumulation [35]. Moreover, several reports have suggested that sugar-sweetened beverages were associated with the presence of dyslipidemia [36], type 2 diabetes mellitus [37] cardiovascular diseases [38] and metabolic syndrome [39, 40]. In the rural community, most residents are agriculturists who work hard daily with insufficient rest, so instant coffee-mix consumption is one alternative refreshment. Thus, lowering sugar level in coffee or black coffee consumption should be suggested. However, in a longitudinal study conducted in The Netherlands, coffee intake was unassociated with BMI [41]; additionally, in a cross-sectional survey of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted in the US, coffee intake was unassociated with BMI and waist circumference among both males and females [42].

The present study reported that higher spot urine sodium levels held a positive relationship to obesity, however this was not statistically significant. A few related studies conducted in the UK, Korea and Brazil supported this finding in that having high sodium excretion levels showed increased odds of overweight status and central obesity [10, 43, 44]. In addition, a population-based cohort study conducted in the US reported that an increase in urinary sodium-to-potassium ratio related to higher total body percentage fat [45]. The phenomenon could be explained along with salt intake measured by urine sodium [44]. One related study showed that salt intake was related to obesity through energy intake such as the co-existence of high salt and high energy junk food diets [46]. The mechanism for a direct effect remains unclear. A possible mechanism is that consuming high levels of salt increases the volume of extracellular water, resulting in increased weight [47]. Another mechanism is that salt could directly increase adipose tissue and body fat [48]. Similarly, one epidemiological study conducted among adolescents revealed a positive relationship between salt consumption and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue, as well as BMI [49].

Participants with a higher number of chronic diseases including type 2 diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia were more associated with obesity. The finding was consistent with one related report in Ireland reporting that a large proportion of chronic disease was attributable to increased BMI [50]; additionally, one study across low to middle income countries involving 31,118 participants found that associations of obesity with diabetes and hypertension were strong [51]. Obesity has been confirmed to increase the risk of metabolic syndrome [52, 53] and noncommunicable diseases resulting in ASCVD [4, 5, 7]. Moreover, the study conducted in Ireland showed that a relatively modest reduction in average BMI had the potential to create a significant impact on the burden of chronic disease [50]. Thus, reducing BMI should be recommended to those with obesity to alleviate any noncommunicable diseases.

The study employed two cross-sectional surveys in 2012 and 2018, making it difficult to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between associated factors and obesity. Because the study employed a serial cross-sectional design, some limitations were encountered regarding the behavioral factors and spot urine Na level that were not included in the 2012 survey. Therefore, we could not combine the two surveys in the same data analysis for risk factors. However, the 2012 survey could provide demographic characteristics and the baseline prevalence of obesity. Thus, only the second survey in 2018 was used to obtain the associated risk factors of obesity in our current study. Some variables were collected very broadly as the number and type of alcohol drinks together with the number of cigarettes consumed and smoking frequency were not recorded; however, the associations between factors and outcomes were able to be presented. Finally, social desirability bias might also have existed in the study due to face-to-face interviews. However, the interviewers were well-trained and used standardized surveys.

Our findings suggested that modifiable risk factors for obesity should be improved. Adults with obesity especially those residing in a rural community should be targeted for more educational interventions in raising awareness regarding reducing their high BMI levels and associated complications and adjusting their daily activities. Our study may not be generalized to the whole country but may reflect challenges of individuals residing in rural communities of Thailand.

Conclusion

Our data emphasized that obesity constituted a serious problem among adults residing in a rural community. A significant increasing trend in the prevalence of obesity was observed and average BMI in the rural community was found to increase over 6 years. Effective public health interventions, especially modifying dietary behavior, should be provided in the community to reduce BMI. The modifiable risks factors for obesity should be attenuated to inhibit the progression of metabolic syndrome, noncommunicable diseases and their associated complications.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset analyzed is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confident interval

AOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

SD:

Standard deviation

HT:

Hypertension

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

DLP:

Dyslipidemia

ASCVD:

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases

GEE:

Generalized estimating equation

References

  1. Hruby A, Hu FB. The epidemiology of obesity: a big picture. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(7):673–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. HSR. I. Thai National Health Examination V (NHES V) 2014 [cited 2019 May 1]. Available from: http://kb.hsri.or.th.

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeMarco VG, Aroor AR, Sowers JR. The pathophysiology of hypertension in patients with obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(6):364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hall JE, do Carmo JM, da Silva AA, Wang Z, Hall ME. Obesity-induced hypertension: interaction of neurohumoral and renal mechanisms. Circ Res. 2015;116(6):991–1006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Danaei G, Singh GM, Paciorek CJ, Lin JK, Cowan MJ, Finucane MM, et al. The global cardiovascular risk transition: associations of four metabolic risk factors with national income, urbanization, and Western diet in 1980 and 2008. Circulation. 2013;127(14):1493–502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Collaboration PS. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373(9669):1083–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Akil L, Ahmad HA. Relationships between obesity and cardiovascular diseases in four southern states and Colorado. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011;22(4 Suppl):61–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee J, Kim HY, Kim J. Coffee consumption and the risk of obesity in Korean women. Nutrients. 2017;9(12):1340.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee J, Hwang Y, Kim K-N, Ahn C, Sung HK, Ko K-P, et al. Associations of urinary sodium levels with overweight and central obesity in a population with a sodium intake. BMC Nutrition. 2018;4(1):47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Izci T, Sayin B, Colak T, Acar NO, Sezer S, Haberal M. Spot urinary sodium may be an Indicator for high blood pressure and metabolic syndrome in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2018;102:S524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoddinott SN, Bass MJ. The dillman total design survey method. Can Fam Physician. 1986;32:2366–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. CfDCa P. Adult tobacco use information 2019 [cited 2019 May 1]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/tobacco/tobacco_glossary.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Inoue S, Zimmet P, Caterson I, Chunming C, Ikeda Y, Khalid A, et al. The Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment. Sydney: Health Communications Australia Pty Ltd.; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aekplakorn W, Inthawong R, Kessomboon P, Sangthong R, Chariyalertsak S, Putwatana P, et al. Prevalence and trends of obesity and association with socioeconomic status in Thai adults: national health examination surveys, 1991–2009. J Obes. 2014;2014:410259.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rautela YS, Reddy BV, Singh AK, Gupta A. The prevalence of obesity among adult population and its association with food outlet density in a hilly area of Uttarakhand. J Family Med Primary Care. 2018;7(4):809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hu L, Huang X, You C, Li J, Hong K, Li P, et al. Prevalence of overweight, obesity, abdominal obesity and obesity-related risk factors in southern China. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0183934.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang R, Zhang P, Gao C, Li Z, Lv X, Song Y, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity and some associated factors among adult residents of Northeast China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e010828.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Pengpid S, Vonglokham M, Kounnavong S, Sychareun V, Peltzer K. The prevalence of underweight and overweight/obesity and its correlates among adults in Laos: a cross-sectional national population-based survey, 2013. Eat Weight Disord. 2020;25(2):265–73.

  20. Taylor A. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  21. DIVISION UNDP. World urbanization prospects 2018 [cited 2019 October 10]. Available from: https://population.un.org/wup/Country-Profiles/.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stelmach-Mardas M, Rodacki T, Dobrowolska-Iwanek J, Brzozowska A, Walkowiak J, Wojtanowska-Krosniak A, et al. Link between food energy density and body weight changes in obese adults. Nutrients. 2016;8(4):229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao Y, Wang L, Xue H, Wang H, Wang Y. Fast food consumption and its associations with obesity and hypertension among children: results from the baseline data of the childhood obesity study in China mega-cities. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):933.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rachmi C, Li M, Baur LA. Overweight and obesity in Indonesia: prevalence and risk factors—a literature review. Public Health. 2017;147:20–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shin H-Y, Kang H-T. Recent trends in the prevalence of underweight, overweight, and obesity in Korean adults: the Korean National Health and nutrition examination survey from 1998 to 2014. J Epidemiol. 2017;27(9):413–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hatthachote P, Rangsin R, Mungthin M, Sakboonyarat B. Trends in the prevalence of obesity among young Thai men and associated factors: from 2009 to 2016. Military Med Res. 2019;6(1):13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jitnarin N, Kosulwat V, Boonpraderm A, Haddock CK, Poston WS. The relationship between smoking, BMI, physical activity, and dietary intake among Thai adults in Central Thailand. Med J Med Assoc Thailand. 2008;91(7):1109.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dare S, Mackay DF, Pell JP. Relationship between smoking and obesity: a cross-sectional study of 499,504 middle-aged adults in the UK general population. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0123579.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Watanabe T, Tsujino I, Konno S, Ito YM, Takashina C, Sato T, et al. Association between smoking status and obesity in a nationwide survey of Japanese adults. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0148926.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jo YH, Talmage DA, Role LW. Nicotinic receptor-mediated effects on appetite and food intake. J Neurobiol. 2002;53(4):618–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Perkins KA. Weight gain following smoking cessation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61(5):768–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rigotti NA, Pasternak RC. Cigarette smoking and coronary heart disease: risks and management. Cardiol Clin. 1996;14(1):51–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Huxley RR, Woodward M. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Lancet (London, England). 2011;378(9799):1297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim KY, Yang SJ, Yun J-M. Consumption of instant coffee mix and risk of metabolic syndrome in subjects that visited a health examination center in Gwangju. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2017;46(5):630–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Stanhope KL. Sugar consumption, metabolic disease and obesity: the state of the controversy. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2016;53(1):52–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Duffey KJ, Gordon-Larsen P, Steffen LM, Jacobs DR Jr, Popkin BM. Drinking caloric beverages increases the risk of adverse cardiometabolic outcomes in the coronary artery risk development in young adults (CARDIA) study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92(4):954–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Schulze MB, Manson JE, Ludwig DS, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in young and middle-aged women. Jama. 2004;292(8):927–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fung TT, Malik V, Rexrode KM, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sweetened beverage consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(4):1037–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Høstmark AT. The Oslo health study: soft drink intake is associated with the metabolic syndrome. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010;35(5):635–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chan T-F, Lin W-T, Huang H-L, Lee C-Y, Wu P-W, Chiu Y-W, et al. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with components of the metabolic syndrome in adolescents. Nutrients. 2014;6(5):2088–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Balk L, Hoekstra T, Twisk J. Relationship between long-term coffee consumption and components of the metabolic syndrome: the Amsterdam growth and health longitudinal study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(4):203–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bouchard DR, Ross R, Janssen I. Coffee, tea and their additives: association with BMI and waist circumference. Obesity facts. 2010;3(6):345–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. dos Santos EM, Brito DJ, Calado IL, França AKT, Lages JS, FdC MJ, et al. Sodium excretion and associated factors in urine samples of African descendants in Alcântara, Brazil: a population based study. Ren Fail. 2018;40(1):22–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Ma Y, He FJ, MacGregor GA. High salt intake: independent risk factor for obesity? Hypertension. 2015;66(4):843–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jain N, Minhajuddin AT, Neeland IJ, Elsayed EF, Vega GL, Hedayati SS. Association of urinary sodium-to-potassium ratio with obesity in a multiethnic cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(5):992–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Drenowatz C, Shook RP, Hand GA, Hebert JR, Blair SN. The independent association between diet quality and body composition. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4928.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Antonios TF, MacGregor GA. Salt--more adverse effects. Lancet (London, England). 1996;348(9022):250–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Fonseca-Alaniz MH, Brito LC, Borges-Silva CN, Takada J, Andreotti S, Lima FB. High dietary sodium intake increases white adipose tissue mass and plasma leptin in rats. Obesity. 2007;15(9):2200–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhu H, Pollock NK, Kotak I, Gutin B, Wang X, Bhagatwala J, et al. Dietary sodium, adiposity, and inflammation in healthy adolescents. Pediatrics. 2014;133(3):e635–e42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Kearns K, Dee A, Fitzgerald AP, Doherty E, Perry IJ. Chronic disease burden associated with overweight and obesity in Ireland: the effects of a small BMI reduction at population level. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Patel SA, Ali MK, Alam D, Yan LL, Levitt NS, Bernabe-Ortiz A, et al. Obesity and its relation with diabetes and hypertension: a cross-sectional study across 4 geographical regions. Global heart. 2016;11(1):71–9 e4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Canale MP, Manca di Villahermosa S, Martino G, Rovella V, Noce A, De Lorenzo A, et al. Obesity-related metabolic syndrome: mechanisms of sympathetic overactivity. Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:865965.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Li Z-L, Woollard JR, Ebrahimi B, Crane JA, Jordan KL, Lerman A, et al. Transition from obesity to metabolic syndrome is associated with altered myocardial autophagy and apoptosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32(5):1132–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their grateful thanks to Ms.Sawitree Samsee and village health volunteers of Baan-Na-Yao Health Promoting Hospital. The authors wish to thank Asst.Prof.Dr. Picha Suwannahitatorn for study statistics consultation. The authors thank all the staff members of the Department of Military and Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, for their support in completing this study.

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Military and Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

    Boonsub Sakboonyarat & Ram Rangsin

  2. Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

    Chanyut Pornpongsawad, Tanatip Sangkool, Chidapha Phanmanas, Nithitchaya Kesonphaet, Nirutti Tangthongtawi, Ammiga Limsakul, Ramita Assavapisitkul, Titipatara Thangthai, Patcha Janenopparkarnjana, Pijitra Varodomvitaya, Wichayada Dachoviboon, Janepoj Laohasara & Naphat Kruthakool

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

    Sarawuth Limprasert

  4. Department of Pharmacology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

    Mathirut Mungthin

  5. Department of Physiology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

    Panadda Hatthachote

Authors
  1. Boonsub Sakboonyarat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chanyut Pornpongsawad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tanatip Sangkool
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chidapha Phanmanas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nithitchaya Kesonphaet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nirutti Tangthongtawi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ammiga Limsakul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ramita Assavapisitkul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Titipatara Thangthai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Patcha Janenopparkarnjana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Pijitra Varodomvitaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Wichayada Dachoviboon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Janepoj Laohasara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Naphat Kruthakool
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Sarawuth Limprasert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Mathirut Mungthin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Panadda Hatthachote
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Ram Rangsin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BS participated in conception, designed, analyzing the data, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. CP participated in conception and drafted the manuscript. TS performed statistical analysis and interpretation. CP performed statistical analysis. NK designed the study and collected the data. NT designed the study and collected the data. AL participated in conception and collecting the data. RA participated in conception and designed the study. TT participated in conception, designed and collecting the data. PJ participated in conception, designed and collected the data. PV participated in conception and interpreting the data. WD participated in collecting and interpreting the data. JL participated in design and interpreting the data. NK participated in collecting the data and interpreting the data. SL participated in conception and designed the study. MM participated in conception and critically revised the draft manuscript. PH participated in conception. RR participated in conception and critically revised the draft manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boonsub Sakboonyarat.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by the Royal Thai Army Medical Department Institutional Review Board, approval number is R167q/61_Exp. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants with the WMA Declaration of Helsinki–Ethics principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Standardized questionnaires for the study (English version).

Additional file 2.

An additional table, univariate analysis factors associated with obesity among adults in a rural community in 2018 (n = 627).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakboonyarat, B., Pornpongsawad, C., Sangkool, T. et al. Trends, prevalence and associated factors of obesity among adults in a rural community in Thailand: serial cross-sectional surveys, 2012 and 2018. BMC Public Health 20, 850 (2020). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12889-020-09004-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12889-020-09004-w

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us