Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics for hearing protection knowledge, attitudes, and comfort of HPDs wearing

From: The influencing factors of hearing protection device usage among noise-exposed workers in Guangdong Province: a structural equation modeling-based survey

 

\( \bar x \pm s \)

N (%)

 

\( \bar x \pm s \)

N (%)

 

\( \bar x \pm s \)

N (%)

 

\( \bar x \pm s \)

N (%)

K1

0.40 ± 0.491

211(40.3)

A1

4.47 ± 0.658

502(95.8)

P1

3.62 ± 0.919

315(60.1)

F1

3.94 ± 0.814

407(77.7)

K2

0.64 ± 0.481

335(63.9)

A2

4.52 ± 0.641

507(96.7)

P2

3.35 ± 0.980

234(44.7)

F2

3.37 ± 0.745

337(64.4)

K3

0.16 ± 0.371

86(16.4)

A3

4.28 ± 0.738

485(92.6)

P3

3.34 ± 0.991

237(45.2)

F3

3.85 ± 0.858

354(67.5)

K4

0.09 ± 0.283

46(8.8)

A4

4.29 ± 0.728

480(91.6)

P4

3.48 ± 0.928

280(53.4)

F4

4.05 ± 0.816

378(72.1)

K5

0.90 ± 0.304

470(89.7)

A5

4.50 ± 0.595

512(97.7)

P5

3.54 ± 1.014

293(55.9)

F5

3.81 ± 0.779

359(68.5)

K6

0.59 ± 0.493

308(58.8)

A6

4.11 ± 0.872

438(83.6)

P6

3.57 ± 0.907

261(49.8)

F6

3.72 ± 0.676

330(63.0)

K7

0.76 ± 0.429

397(75.8)

   

P7

2.84 ± 0.957

135(25.8)

F7

3.45 ± 0.668

237(45.3)

      

P8

3.18 ± 0.828

181(34.5)

F8

3.59 ± 0.902

306(58.0)

      

P9

3.04 ± 0.615

379(72.3)

   

K

3.54 ± 1.552

50.6%

A

26.17 ± 2.958

87.2%

P

29.98 ± 5.601

66.6%

F

30.15 ± 4.336

75.4%

  1. K, Total awareness rate of hearing protection knowledge; A, Total holding rate of positive attitudes toward hearing protection; P, Total comfort feeling rate of physical; F, Total comfort score rate of functional. N, The number of people who answered each question correctly in the knowledge dimension, and the number of people who scored higher than their average score on each question in attitude, physical and functional dimensions. The % of the last line was the average score as a percentage of the total score.