Table 3 Characteristics of outcome(s) of included studies (n = 7)
Study (na) | Outcome(s) | Participants using outcomes % or mean (SDb) | Type of condom and sexual act | Type of measure | Report on consistency | Type of partner | Analysis | Missing values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Walsh et al. 2014 (n = 296) [85] | Dual method | NRb | Undifferentiated – vaginal | Dichotomous (yes/no) | Yes | Other | Multilevel modeling | Multiple imputation |
Kottke et al. 2015 (n = 350) [84] | Condom use | 20.6 | NMb—NM | Dichotomous (yes/no) | No | NM | Generalized estimating equations with multinomial outcome | No missing values |
Dual method | 20.6 | |||||||
Wallace et al. 2015 (n = 289) [36] | Number of unprotected vaginal sex | 12.0 (18.7) | NM – vaginal | Continuous (number of times condoms were used in a given period) | Yes | NM | Linear regression | No missing values |
Consistent condom use | 19.0 | Logistic regression | ||||||
Proportional condom use (= 1) | 54.7 (35.7) | Linear regression | ||||||
Clarke et al. 2016 (n = 350) [33] | Multiple methods | 63.1 | NM – vaginal | Dichotomous (yes/no) | No | NM | Logistic regression | No missing values |
Chambliss et al. 2021 (n = 573) [81] | Condom use (wave 12) | 56.9c | NM – NM | Dichotomous (yes/no) | No | NM | Logistic regression | Exclusion |
Ebuenyi et al. 2021 (n = 400) [82] | Risky sexual behavior | 46.8 | NM – NM | Dichotomous (yes/no) | No | NM | Logistic regression | No missing values |
Kawuki et al. 2022 (n = 539) [83] | Multiple methods | 17.4 | Male condom – NM | Dichotomous (yes/no) | No | NM | Logistic regression | No missing values |