Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of an NMA expressed as odds ratios with 95% CrIs

From: A review of the quantitative effectiveness evidence synthesis methods used in public health intervention guidelines

 

UC

Ed

Ed+Eq

Ed+Eq+HSI

Ed+Eq+In

Eq

UC

-

1.36 (0.93,1.98)

1.65 (0.87, 3.17)

2.90 (0.74, 11.33)

1.18 (0.96, 1.47)

 

Ed

1.33 (0.79, 2.35)

-

  

1.41 (0.49, 4.06)

 

Ed+Eq

1.68 (0.53, 5.43)

1.25 (0.35, 4.54)

-

  

0.32 (0.01, 7.96)

Ed+Eq+HSI

5.11 (1.83, 14.58)

3.80 (1.16, 12.44)

3.03 (0.63, 14.22)

-

  

Ed+Eq+In

1.26 (0.70, 2.62)

0.96 (0.46, 2.15)

0.76 (0.21, 3.02)

0.25 (0.08, 0.90)

-

 

Eq

0.30 (0.00, 10.75)

0.22 (0.00, 8.25)

0.19 (0.00, 5.27)

0.06 (0.00, 2.46)

0.23 (0.00, 8.51)

-

  1. NMA results are in the bottom left half of the table. Pairwise meta-analysis or single study results, where no other direct evidence is available, are in the top right half of the table.
  2. Notation UC: Usual care, Ed: Education, Ed+Eq: Education and equipment, Ed+Eq+HSI: Education, equipment, and home safety inspection, Ed+Eq+In: Education, equipment and installation, Eq: Equipment
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us