Skip to main content

Table 4 Demand for centre-based child-care and relationships with child, care-giver and household characteristics

From: Understanding demand for, and feasibility of, centre-based child-care for poor urban households: a mixed methods study in Dhaka, Bangladesh

 

Prepared to enrol in centre-based child-care

Prepared to pay for centre-based child-care

Prepared to pay extra to subsidise centre-based child-care for children from low-income families

n

% (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI); p-value

N

% (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI); p-value

n

% (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI); p-value

All households

136/215

63 (48–76)

NA

187/222

84 (74–91)

NA

92/169

54% (35–73)

NA

Slum/non-slum status of household

 Non-slum

27/59

46 (24–69)

Ref

46/62

74 (52–89)

Ref

30/44

68% (31–91)

Ref

 Slum

109/156

70 (56–81)

3.8 (1.4, 10); 0.016

141/160

88 (80–93)

2 (0.8, 4.9); 0.1

62/125

50% (32–67)

0.6 (0.3, 1.1); 0.08

Age (child)

 3.5 to < 5

43/89

48 (31–66)

Ref

73/93

78 (70–85)

Ref

44/70

63% (37–83)

Ref

 1 to < 3.5

93/126

74 (61–84)

2.9 (1.4, 6.2); 0.013

114/129

88 (70–96)

1.9 (0.5, 6.8); 0.25

48/99

48% (31–67)

0.6 (0.2, 1.1); 0.11

Sex (child)

 Female

63/105

60 (40–77)

Ref

91/108

84 (75–91)

Ref

47/83

57% (34–77)

Ref

 Male

73/110

66 (54–76)

1.7 (0.9, 3.3); 0.1

96/114

84 (68–93)

1.4 (0.9, 5.4); 0.56

45/86

52% (34–70)

0.9 (0.5, 1.7); 0.68

Need secondary care-giver

 No

87/148

59 (43–73)

Ref

124/152

82 (71–89)

Ref

60/111

54% (40–68)

Ref

 Yes

46/63

73 (52–87)

2.4 (1.1, 5.2); 0.032

60/66

91 (80–96)

2.2 (0.9, 5.4); 0.07

30/55

55% (24–82)

1 (0.3, 4); 0.94

Primary care-giver (PCG) working

 No

112/177

63 (47–77%)

Ref

155/184

84 (71–92)

Ref

77/136

57% (36–75%)

Ref

 Yes

24/38

63 (45–78)

0.6 (0.3, 1.2); 0.11

32/38

84 (72–92)

0.6 (0.2, 1.9); 0.35

15/33

45% (29–63%)

0.7 (0.3, 1.5); 0.27

PCG ever missed work due to lack of childcare

 No

95/153

62 (48–74)

Ref

131/158

83 (73–90)

Ref

68/118

58% (40–74)

Ref

 Yes

39/53

74 (52–88)

1.1 (0.4, 2.8); 0.83

48/53

91 (81–96)

1.4 (0.7, 2.9); 0.26

17/44

39% (14–70)

0.5 (0.2, 1.7); 0.23

PCG education status

 Literate

108/174

66% (48–80)

Ref

151/181

83 (7–91)

Ref

78/135

58% (34–78)

Ref

 Illiterate

28/41

62 (48–74)

0.8 (0.3, 2.1); 0.66

36/41

88 (58–97)

1 (0.2, 5.9); 0.97

14/34

41% (31–52)

0.5 (0.2, 1.1); 0.08

  1. Missing cases are excluded from frequencies and percentages. Confidence intervals for percentages are logit transformed and account for the clustered survey design. AOR = adjusted odds ratio. Ref = reference group for categorical variable effect comparison. For each outcome the adjusted odds ratios, their 95% confidence intervals and associated p-values are obtained from a logistic regression model (that accounts for the clustered survey design) including all listed covariates, excluding missing cases (complete cases for models: prepared to enrol in centre-based child-care = 195/222, prepared to pay for centre-based child-care = 210/222, prepared to pay extra to subsidise centre-based child-care for low socio-economic status children = 161/222)