Skip to main content

Table 2 The influencing factors of the two-week prevalence rate according to the univariate and multivariate analysis of individuals from Tibet in 2018

From: Illness prevalence rate in Tibet, China: data from the 2018 National Health Service Survey

Influence factor

 

Crude OR

95% CI

Adjusted OR

95% CI

&p value

Gender

Female

1.000

 

1.000

  

Male

0.627

(0.569,0.692)

0.691

(0.622,0.767)

< 0.001

Age

15–29

1.000

 

1.000

  

30–44

1.912

(1.595,2.290)

1.464

(1.201,1.784)

< 0.001

45–59

3.944

(3.318,4.689)

2.804

(2.304,3.413)

< 0.001

60-

5.000

(4.158,6.013)

2.968

(2.367,3.722)

< 0.001

Residence

Urban

1.000

 

1.000

  

Rural

0.574

(0.514,0.640)

0.610

(0.541,0.689)

< 0.001

Education

Illiterate

1.000

 

1.000

  

Primary school

0.772

(0.694,0.859)

0.921

(0.822,1.032)

0.155

Junior middle school

0.481

(0.401,0.576)

0.876

(0.717,1.072)

0.199

High school

0.573

(0.454,0.724)

0.974

(0.741,1.279)

0.849

University and above

0.251

(0.132,0.480)

0.568

(0.288,1.120)

0.102

Economic level

Low

1.000

 

1.000

  

Medium

1.148

(1.017,1.296)

1.134

(1.000,1.287)

0.051

High

1.240

(1.081,1.423)

1.106

(0.953,1.283)

0.185

Marital status

Married

1.000

 

1.000

  

Unmarried

0.407

(0.340,0.486)

0.684

(0.562,0.832)

< 0.001

Widow

2.182

(1.856,2.565)

1.279

(1.070,1.529)

0.007

Divorce

1.781

(1.324,2.478)

1.644

(1.187,2.277)

0.003

Others

1.134

(0.648,1.984)

1.023

(0.575,1.819)

0.940

Employment status

Employed

1.000

 

1.000

  

Retired

2.696

(2.022,3.593)

1.295

(0.945,1.776)

0.108

Laid-off

3.251

(2.380,4.440)

2.360

(1.695,3.287)

< 0.001

Unemployed

1.868

(1.655,2.110)

1.238

(1.075,1.424)

0.003

Student

0.131

(0.065,0.266)

0.334

(0.159,0.701)

0.004

  1. &: p value adjusted by multivariate logistic regression analysis
  2. /: In multivariate regression analysis, the Enter method was used to adjust for confounding factors