Skip to main content

Table 4 Perceived Health and Economic Impacts of Tax in Seattle, by Race/Ethnicity

From: Perceptions of the possible health and economic impacts of Seattle’s sugary beverage tax

 

Non-Hispanic Whitesa

(N = 588)

Non-Hispanic Blacksa

(N = 60)

Non-Hispanic Asiansa

(N = 66)

Non-Hispanic Other Racea,b (N = 78)

Hispanics (N = 56)a

p value

 

% (95% CI)

% (95% CI)

% (95% CI)

% (95% CI)

% (95% CI)

 

Opinion on Taxc

 Approve

64% (59, 68%)

46% (33, 60%)

49% (36, 62%)

53% (41, 65%)

53% (38, 68%)

0.17

 Disapprove

33% (28, 37%)

49% (36, 63%)

45% (32, 58%)

42% (31, 55%)

42% (28, 57%)

 

 Don’t know

3.9% (2.5, 6.1%)

4.3% (1.0, 17%)

6.4% (2.4, 16%)

4.4% (1.6, 12%)

5.1% (1.3, 18%)

 

Child Well Beingd

 Tax will improve child health and wellbeing

61% (57, 66%)

46% (33, 61%)

59% (46, 71%)

44% (33, 57%)

60% (45, 73%)

0.18

 Tax will not improve child health and wellbeing

35% (31, 40%)

44% (31, 58%)

36% (25, 50%)

51% (38, 63%)

39% (26, 54%)

 

 Don’t know

3.3% (2.0, 5.3%)

10% (3.6, 23%)

4.5% (1.5, 13%)

4.9% (1.4, 16%)

1.2% (0.17, 8.2%)

 

Public Healthd

 Tax will improve public health

59% (54, 63%)

42% (29, 57%)

55% (42, 68%)

42% (30, 54%)

52% (38, 67%)

0.095

 Tax will not improve public health

38% (33, 42%)

48% (34, 62%)

39% (27, 52%)

51% (39, 64%)

48% (33, 62%)

 

 Don’t know

3.6% (2.3, 5.6%)

10% (3.7, 24%)

5.6% (2.1, 14%)

6.8% (2.6, 17%)

0% (0, 0%)

 

Cross-Border Shoppingd

 Participant will not cross-border shop

78% (74, 82%)

77% (63, 87%)

77% (64, 86%)

82% (70, 90%)

68% (52, 80%)

0.029

 Participant will cross-border shop

20% (17, 25%)

13% (7.0, 25%)

17% (10, 29%)

17% (10, 29%)

29% (17, 45%)

 

 Don’t know

1.7% (0.91, 3.0%)

10% (3.6, 23%)

5.8% (2.2, 15%)

1.0% (0.10, 6.7%)

3.3% (0.80, 13%)

 

Seattle's Economyd

 Tax will have a positive effect on the economy

48% (43, 53%)

49% (35, 63%)

46% (33, 59%)

44% (32, 56%)

50% (35, 64%)

0.81

 Tax will have a negative effect on the economy

36% (31, 40%)

26% (16, 39%)

39% (27, 53%)

34% (23, 47%)

35% (23, 51%)

 

 Don’t know

16% (13, 20%)

25% (14, 39%)

15% (7.8, 27%)

22% (13, 34%)

15% (7.7, 27%)

 

Small Businessesd

 Tax will not negatively affect small businesses

53% (49, 58%)

45% (32, 59%)

51% (38, 64%)

42% (31, 55%)

60% (44, 73%)

0.036

 Tax will negatively affect small businesses

40% (35, 44%)

38% (25, 52%)

33% (22, 46%)

48% (36, 60%)

38% (25, 53%)

 

 Don’t know

7.1% (5.3, 9.5%)

17% (8.6, 31%)

17% (9.1, 29%)

10% (4.3, 21%)

2.4% (0.59, 9.3%)

 

Job Lossd

 Tax will not result in job loss

67% (62, 71%)

61% (46, 73%)

63% (50, 75%)

65% (52, 75%)

75% (60, 86%)

0.022

 Tax will result in job loss

25% (21, 29%)

22% (13, 34%)

16% (9.0, 29%)

19% (11, 31%)

19% (10, 34%)

 

 Don’t know

8.2% (6.2, 11%)

18% (9.1, 31%)

20% (12, 33%)

16% (9.0, 27%)

5.3% (1.6, 16%)

 

Family Financesd

 Tax will not negatively affect family finances

82% (79, 86%)

63% (48, 75%)

73% (60, 83%)

81% (71, 88%)

67% (51, 79%)

<0.001*

 Tax will negatively affect family finances

16% (13, 20%)

31% (20, 45%)

16% (8.0, 27%)

14% (8.0, 24%)

27% (15, 43%)

 

 Don’t know

1.3% (0.70, 2.4%)

6.4% (1.9, 20%)

11% (5.3, 22%)

4.6% (1.7,12%)

5.6% (1.8, 17%)

 

Impact on Low-Income People and People of Color

 Tax will positively impact people with low-income/people of color

50% (45, 54%)

54% (40, 68%)

37% (25, 50%)

46% (34, 59%)

49% (34, 64%)

0.48

 Tax will negatively impact people with low-income/people of color

40% (36, 45%)

32% (20, 46%)

48% (35, 61%)

42% (31, 55%)

44% (30, 59%)

 

 Don’t know

10% (7.8, 13%)

14% (6.6, 26%)

15% (7.9, 27%)

11% (5.3, 22%)

7.3% (2.7, 19%)

 

Individual Choiced

 People will have the choice to drink the beverages they want

74% (70, 78%)

64% (49, 76%)

63% (50, 75%)

71% (59, 81%)

63% (48%,7 6%)

0.32

 People will not have the choice to drink the beverages they want

23% (20, 27%)

33% (22, 47%)

32% (21, 46%)

24% (15, 36%)

37% (24, 52%)

 

 Don’t know

2.8 (1.7, 4.4%)

3.0% (0.42, 18%)

4.5% (1.5, 13%)

4.7% (1.3, 15%)

0% (0.0, 0.0%)

 
  1. CI confidence interval
  2. aValues are rounded to two significant digits. Missing data: ethnicity (n = 3 [individuals who responded “don’t know”]); opinion on tax (n = 1); cross-border shopping (n = 4), small business (n = 1); job loss (n = 1); impact on people with low-income/people of color (n = 4); individual choice (n = 1)
  3. bNative Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders, American Indian and Alaska Natives, and those reporting two or more races are categorized as non-Hispanic Other
  4. cResponses included: strongly disapprove, somewhat disapprove, somewhat approve, strongly approve, don’t know. These categories are collapsed into: approve, disapprove, don’t know
  5. dParticipants were read two statements and asked to indicate if the first statement was much closer, the first statement was somewhat closer, the second statement was much closer, or the second statement was somewhat closer. There was also an option to report “don’t know” or “refused” for each of the questions. These categories are collapsed into: the first statement was closer, the second statement was closer or don’t know
  6. *Denotes statistically significant difference in participants’ response to all three response categories (agree, disagree, don’t know), comparing all races to each other, after considering multiple comparisons, using the Holm-Bonferroni Sequential Correction (global p < 0.01). Statistical significance estimated using a Chi-squared test