Table 2 Key IDSR performance indicators before and after revitalisation of the IDSR program
Indicator | Target | Before | After | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | ||
National level indicators | ||||||||
Completeness of reporting (%) | ||||||||
Monthly | 80 | 99.0 | 79.0 | 69.0 | 91.2 | 97.6 | 100 | 100 |
Weekly | 80 | 96.0 | 71.5 | 56.2 | 61.0 | 51.2 | 68.8 | 78.0 |
Timeliness of reporting (%) | ||||||||
Monthly | 80 | 88.0 | 69.1 | 58.9 | 73.1 | 82.0 | 86.5 | 92.5 |
Weekly | 80 | 96.0 | 55.0 | 40.3 | 42.1 | 50.0 | 57.8 | 68.3 |
Cholera case fatality rate (%) | < 1 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.1 |
Annualized Non-Polio AFP Rate (per 100,000 population below 15 years) | ≥4.0a | 2.2 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.7 |
Sent feedback to district level (%) | 100 | 100 | – | – | – | – | – | 100.0 |
District level indicators | ||||||||
Analysed data on priority diseases (%) | 100 | 75.0 | – | – | – | – | – | 61.5 |
Suspected outbreaks notified to MoH within 48 h (%) | 100 | 46.0 | – | – | – | – | – | 57.7 |
Laboratory confirmation for the most recent outbreak (%) | 100 | 61.0 | – | – | – | – | – | 73.1 |
District Surveillance Focal Person (%) | 100 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 96.2 |
District Laboratory Focal Person (%) | 100 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100.0 |
Functional epidemic preparedness and response committee (%) | 100 | 65.0 | – | – | – | – | – | 69.2 |
Sent feed back to lower levels (%) | 100 | 55.0 | – | – | – | – | – | 86.6 |