Skip to main content

Table 5 Stated reasons for not participating across the three non-participant groups (N = 209)

From: Barriers to bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: a comparison of non-responders, active decliners and non-attenders

 

Total

(N = 209)

NRs

(N = 102)

ADs

(N = 77)

NAs

(N = 30)

p-value*

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Worried about pain

69

(33.01)

38

(37.25)

25

(32.47)

6

(20.00)

0.208b

Embarrassing

63

(30.14)

39

(38.24)

22

(28.57)

2

(6.67)

0.002

Not needed

54

(25.84)

31

(30.39)

22

(28.57)

1

(3.33)

0.004

Worried about harm

53

(25.36)

23

(22.55)

25

(32.47)

5

(16.67)

0.159b

Appointment problems

51

(24.40)

24

(23.53)

19

(24.68)

8

(26.67)

0.938b

Enema not wanted

44

(21.05)

24

(23.53)

14

(18.18)

6

(20.00)

0.678b

No time

34

(16.27)

20

(19.61)

10

(12.99)

4

(13.33)

0.469

Worried about result

16

(7.66)

15

(14.71)

0

(0.00)

1

(3.33)

< 0.001

Medical reasons

16

(7.66)

4

(3.92)

5

(6.49)

7

(23.33)

0.005

Unacceptable

12

(5.74)

7

(6.86)

5

(6.49)

0

(0.00)

0.428

Bad experience

11

(5.26)

6

(5.88)

3

(3.90)

2

(6.67)

0.760

Other test donea

11

(5.26)

2

(1.96)

5

(6.49)

4

(13.33)

0.030

Forgot

7

(3.35)

6

(5.88)

0

(0.00)

1

(3.33)

0.070

Financiala problems

3

(1.44)

1

(0.98)

1

(1.30)

1

(3.33)

0.537

  1. NRs Non Responders, ADs Active Decliners, NAs Non-Attenders
  2. The provided options ‘Not understanding the information booklet’ and ‘transport problems’ were not selected by anyone in either of the three groups
  3. aEmerged from free text section
  4. *The p-values are derived from Fisher’s exact test if not otherwise stated (bChi-square test of Independence)