Skip to main content

Table 2 Hazard ratios (95 % confidence intervals) of incident type 2 diabetes according to the dose of leisure-time moderate- and vigorous-intensity exercise

From: Leisure-time, occupational, and commuting physical activity and risk of type 2 diabetes in Japanese workers: a cohort study

 

Inactive

Low dose

Physical activity meeting recommendation

P for trenda

   

Medium dose

High dose

 

Medium exercise dose

0

3.7

10.5

23.0

 

No. of subjects

17,437

4,331

2,831

2,029

 

No. of cases

1,210

257

166

137

 

Person-years

91,266

23,080

13,278

12,116

 

Cases/ 10,000 person-years

133

111

125

113

 

Model 1b

1.00 (reference)

0.83 (0.73, 0.95)

0.89 (0.76, 1.05)

0.78 (0.65, 0.93)

0.003

Model 2c

1.00 (reference)

0.89 (0.78, 1.02)

0.95 (0.80, 1.11)

0.85 (0.71, 1.01)

0.06

Model 3d

1.00 (reference)

0.87 (0.76, 1.00)

0.92 (0.78, 1.08)

0.83 (0.69, 0.99)

0.024

  1. aP for the trend was calculated using Cox proportional hazard regression, and ordinal numbers 0, 4, 11, and 23 were assigned to increasing levels of leisure-time physical activity, which was treated as continuous variable
  2. bAdjusted for age (years, continuous) and sex
  3. cAdjusted for age (years, continuous), sex, shift work (yes or no), sleep duration (<5, <6, 6 to <7, or ≥7 h per day), alcohol consumption (non-drinker, current drinker consuming <1, 1 to <2, or ≥2 go of Japanese sake equivalent per day [1 go of Japanese sake contains approximately 23 g of ethanol]), smoking (never, past, current smoker consuming 1 to 20 or ≥21 cigarettes per day), hypertension (yes or no), a family history of diabetes (yes or no), occupational activity (mostly sedentary, mostly standing, walking often, or fairly active), and walking for commuting to and from work (<20, 20 to <40, or ≥40 min of walking)
  4. dAdjusted for factors in model 2 plus body mass index (kg/m2, continuous)