Projects | ANC | Institutional delivery | PNC | Contraception |
---|---|---|---|---|
Khan et al. 2008 (FP) [23]c | 1. Proportions discussing about spacing and family planning (%) | |||
% of couples who discussed family planning methods: Exp. Group (Exp.): 61 % (N = 560); Con. Group (Con): 39 % (N = 570); Sig (p < = 0.001) | ||||
% of couples who discussed when to have next child: Exp.: 85 %, con: 85 %; Non Sig Z test, Exp. vs. Con. | ||||
2. Contraceptive use at 9 months post-partum | ||||
% of women currently using family planning (FP): Exp: 63 %, Con: 32 %; Sig (p < = 0.001) | ||||
% currently pregnant: Exp.: 10 %, Con: 16 %; Sig (p < = 0.001) Z test, Exp. vs. Con. | ||||
(Data Source: End line Survey) | ||||
Santhya et al. 2008 (FTP) [24] | Comprehensive antenatal care received by first time mothers: | % of first time mothers who reported institutional delivery | First time mothers who reported receiving routine checkups within six weeks postpartum | 1. Use of contraceptive to delay first birth: |
Diamond Harbour (DH): | Diamond Harbour (DH): | Diamond Harbour (DH): | Diamond Harbour (DH) site: | |
Con; BL: 6.5a; EL: 7.7 (N = 244,500); Sig. | Con; BL: 61 %; EL: 70 % (N = 244,500); Sig | Con.; BL: 7 %; EL: 27 % (N = 244,500); Sig | Con.; Baseline (BL): 54 %; End-line (EL): 66 % (N = 212, 238), | |
Exp. non-intervention; | Exp. non-intervention; | Exp. non-intervention; BL: | Exp. non-interventionb; BL: 24 %; | |
BL: 6; EL: 6.9, (N = 206, 191); Sig. | BL: 43 %; EL: 49 %, (N = 206, 191); Non sig | 6 %; EL: 15 % (N = 206,191); Sig | EL: 34 % (N = 94, 281) | |
Exp. intervention; BL: 6.1; EL: 7.7 (N = 114,460); Non sig | Exp. intervention; BL: 40 %; EL: 51 % (N = 114,460); Sig | Exp. intervention; BL: 6 %; EL: 45 % (N = 114/460); Sig | Exp. intervention; BL: 28 %; EL: 39 % (N = 163, 96) | |
Vadodara (VD): | Vadodara (VD): | Vadodara (VD): | Vadodara (VD) site: | |
Con; BL: 6.3; EL: 7.9 (N = 270,314); Sig | Con; BL: 56 %; EL: 68 % (N = 270,314); Sig | Control; BL: 29 %; EL: 33 % (N = 270/314); Sig | Control; BL: 36 %; EL: 13 % (N = 259, 338); Sig | |
Exp.non-intervention; BL: 7.1; EL: 7.8 (N = 228,159); Sig | Exp. non-intervention; BL: 65 %; EL: 77 % (N = 228,159); Sig | Exp. non-intervention; BL: 26 %; EL: 49 % (N = 228/159); Sig | Exp. non-intervention; BL: 34 %; EL: 11 % (N = 176, 310); Sig | |
Exp. intervention; BL: 8.3; EL: 8.8 (N = 61,285); Non sig | Exp. intervention; BL: 71 %; EL: 70 % (N = 61,285); Non Sig | Exp. intervention; BL: 28 %; EL: 51 % (N = 61,285); Sig Data Source: Baseline End line Survey | Exp. intervention; BL: 18 %; EL: 21 %, Non Sig | |
Daniel et al. 2008 (PRACHAR) [25]c | 1. % of Married women aged 15–24 years who were using contraception | |||
BL; Control: 2.8 %, Intervention: 4.3 % | ||||
Follow –up period: Control: 4.7 %, Intervention: 20.7 %, Sig | ||||
Interventions vs. Control: (OR: 3.8:1.0; p < 0.001) | ||||
2. % increase in median interval (in months) between marriage and first birth: | ||||
BL; Intervention area: 21.3 months, Non-intervention areas: NA | ||||
EL- Intervention area: 24 months; Non-intervention areas: NA | ||||
(Data Source: Baseline and Follow-Up Data) | ||||
ACQUIRE, Evaluation and Research Studies Nepal 2008 [26] | Women who attended ANC on 4 or more occasions | Decrease in proportion of home delivery: | Use of PNC increased: Use of postnatal care services by young married women | 1. Actual use of contraception to postpone first birth among young married women: |
BL: 29.4 % and EL: 49.9 % (N = NA) | BL: 75 % and EL: 67 % (N = NA) | BL: 20 % and EL: 30 % (N = 240, 269) | BL: 4.4 % and EL: 4.8 %, (N = 294, 333) | |
Note: NA = data on sample size is Not Available | (Data Source: Baseline and End line Survey) | |||
CREPHA, Nepal2004 (REWARD Project) [27] | Attended 4 or more ANC visits: | % of young married women who delivered their last child in hospital: | 1. Contraceptive prevalence rate: (%) among young married women | |
MG area: BL: 24.8 %, EL: 52.9 %; Sig | YCAG area: BL-5.9 %, EL: 16.1 % | Youth Communication Action Groups (YCAG) area; BL: 26 %, EL: 28 % | ||
Control area: BL: 14.4 %, EL: 43.2 %; Sig | Control: BL-2.6 %, EL: 5.3 % | |||
Mothers’ Group (MG) area; BL: 19 %, EL: 37 % | ||||
(Data Source: Baseline and End line Survey) | Control area; BL: 29 %, EL: 34 % | |||
2. Mean age at pregnancy among young married women | ||||
YCAG area; BL: 18.1 %, EL: 18.5 % | ||||
MG area; BL: 18.0 %, EL: 18.3 % | ||||
Control area; BL: 17.7 %, EL: 17.5 % | ||||
Shattuck et al. 2011 (MMM) [28]c | Contraceptive uptake among young men with married or co-habiting partner: | |||
OR for contraceptive uptake among young males between intervention and control groups: OR (95 % CI): 2.4 (1.45,4.03) Sig | ||||
OR for increase in communication frequency among young couples between intervention and control groups: OR (95 % CI): 0.61 (0.36, 1.02) Sig | ||||
(Data Source: Baseline and Post-Intervention Data) | ||||
Note: OR indicates Odds Ratio | ||||
Pande et al. (a) 2006 (KEM) [29] | Knowledge regarding Regular ANC check-ups | Awareness improved with respect to condom use as a way to prevent STIs and HIV | ||
Pre: 50 %, post: 75 % | Note: Data is not available | |||
(Data Source: Pre and Post-Intervention Data) | ||||
Pande et al. (b) 2006 (FRHS) [30] | Change in knowledge among young married women on need for ANC check-ups between baseline and end line: | Knowledge on side effects of contraceptive use has increased | ||
Note: Data is not available | ||||
Social Mobilization arm (SM) only: 24.2 %, Government Services arm (GS) only: 18.5 %, SM + GS: 12 %, Control: 18.9 % | ||||
Change in knowledge among young married women on danger signs of pregnancy between baseline and end line: | ||||
SM only: 24.4 %, GS only: 22.5 %, SM + GS: 24.2 %, control: 16.5 % | ||||
(Data Source: Baseline and End line Survey) |