Skip to main content

Table 2 Potential risk factors assessed by bivariate analysis for brucellosis seropositivity in humans (n = 235)

From: Human brucellosis: sero-prevalence and associated risk factors in agro-pastoral communities of Kiboga District, Central Uganda

Variable

% participants (n = 235)

Frequency

+ve Brucella (n, %)

Unadjusted OR (95 % CI)

P-value

Animal exposure at home

No

48.1

113

15 (13.3)

  
 

Yes

51.9

122

25 (20.5)

1.68 (0.84, 3.39)

0.14

Animal exposure at work

No

76.2

179

28 (15.6)

  
 

Yes

23.8

56

12 (21.4)

1.47 (0.69, 3.13)

0.32

Handling of aborted fetuses

No

94.0

221

37 (16.7)

  
 

Yes

6.0

14

3 (21.4)

1.36 (0.36, 5.10)

0.65

Slaughter animals

No

92.8

218

35 (16.1)

  
 

Yes

7.2

17

5 (29.4)

2.18 (0.72, 6.57)

0.17

Milking

No

83.8

197

32 (16.2)

  
 

Yes

16.2

38

8 (21.1)

1.38 (0.58, 3.27)

0.47

Processing Milk products

No

73.6

173

24 (13.9)

  
 

Yes

26.4

62

16 (25.8)

2.16 (1.06, 4.41)

0.035

Consuming raw milk

No

87.2

205

34 (16.6)

  
 

Yes

12.8

30

6 (20.0)

1.26 (0.48, 3.31)

0.64

Consuming milk products

No

46.8

110

12 (10.9)

  
 

Yes

53.2

125

28 (22.4)

2.36 (1.13, 4.90)

0.022

Assist animals giving births

No

89.8

211

33 (15.6)

  
 

Yes

10.2

24

7 (29.2)

2.22 (0.85, 5.77)

0.102

Drinking animal’s urine

No

97.0

228

37 (16.2)

  
 

Yes

3.0

7

3 (42.9)

3.87 (0.83, 18.02)

0.084

Sharing water points with animals

No

93.6

220

35 (15.9)

  
 

Yes

6.4

15

5 (33.3)

2.64 (0.85, 8.20)

0.093