Skip to main content

Table 4 Stigma toward persons with HIV among 556 FSWs a at baseline and at six months after intervention, Shanghai, 2009-10

From: Impact evaluation of a community-based intervention to reduce risky sexual behaviour among female sex workers in Shanghai, China

 

Intervention (n = 278)

Control (n = 278)

Intervention vs. Control

AOR (95% CI)b

p-value

p-value

Baseline, % (n)

Follow-up, % (n)

p-value

Baseline, % (n)

Follow-up, % (n)

p-value

Baseline

Follow-up

Would keep it secret if afamily member was infected with HIV

47.1 (278)

62.9 (278)

0.0002

55.1 (276)

65.1 (278)

0.0201

0.074

0.6586

1.00 (0.69-1.46)

0.9815

Would not be willing to care for a family member who became sick with HIV in her household

4.3 (277)

2.5 (278)

0.3563

6.9 (274)

4.7 (277)

0.346

0.2541

0.2514

0.58 (0.21-1.62)

0.297

Would not allow their child to be in same classroom with another child infected with HIV

54.0 (278)

42.8 (278)

0.0109

59.6 (275)

57.8 (277)

0.7182

0.2069

0.0006

0.56 (0.9-0.81)

0.0019

Would not eat in a restaurant where cook infected with HIV

78.7 (277)

58.1 (277)

<0.0001

75.0 (276)

69.8 (278)

0.2013

0.352

0.0056

0.54 (0.37-0.78)

0.0011

Would not be willing to work next to or near a person who is infected with HIV

63.4 (276)

45.7 (276)

<0.0001

69.7 (277)

61.2 (278)

0.0432

0.141

0.0004

0.57 (0.39-0.81)

0.002

Would not tell a close family member if she learned she was infected with HIV

29.9 (278)

19.8 (278)

0.008

32.0 (275)

28.4 (278)

0.4094

0.6503

0.0226

0.66 (0.43-1.02)

0.0596

Didn’t think people diagnosed with HIV should tell their sexual partners

8.3 (278)

9.7 (278)

0.6565

17.0 (276)

6.8 (278)

0.0004

0.0029

0.2812

2.09 (1.06-4.10)

0.0325

  1. aRandomly selected 57 participants who were lost to follow-up in the intervention arm were added to equalize the sample sizes in the two arms.
  2. bAdjusted odd ratio, invention group vs. control group at follow-up after adjusting for baseline level and venue type.