Skip to main content

Table 6 Sensitivity, specificity, and false detection rate of Poisson CUSUM signals for syndromic influenza surveillance during week 36 (30.8.) to week 52 (31.12.) in 2009

From: Validity and timeliness of syndromic influenza surveillance during the autumn/winter wave of A (H1N1) influenza 2009: results of emergency medical dispatch, ambulance and emergency department data from three European regions

Data source

Sensitivity*%

Specificity%

Sensitivity*%

Specificity%

False detection rate%

 

Weekly

Daily

Weekly

Daily

EMD-AT

(3/9)

(5/8)

(5/67)

(53/56)

(3/6)

(3/8)

33.3

62.5

7.5

94.6

50.0

37.5

EP-AT

(0/9)

(8/8)

(0/67)

(56/56)

(0/0)

(0/0)

0.0

100.0

0.0

100.0

  

EP-BE

(6/10)

(6/7)

(12/70)

(51/53)

(1/7)

(2/14)

60.0

85.7

17.1

96.2

14.3

14.3

ED-BE

(10/10)

(4/7)

(26/70)

(45/53)

(3/13)

(8/34)

100.0

57.1

37.1

84.9

23.1

23.5

ED-ES

(6/8)

(8/9)

(30/56)

(63/67)

(1/7)

(4/34)

 

75.0

88.9

53.6

94.0

14.3

11.8

  1. *Brackets: Number of weeks / days with at least one true-positive Poisson CUSUM signal in syndromic surveillance data divided by number of pandemic weeks/days according to reference data.
  2. Brackets: Number of true-negative weeks / days (no Poisson CUSUM signal) in syndromic surveillance data divided by number of weeks / days outside the pandemic period according to reference data.
  3. Brackets: Number of weeks/days with a false-positive Poisson CUSUM signal in syndromic surveillance data divided by all Poisson CUSUM signals of syndromic surveillance data.