Skip to main content

Table 2 Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of having poor self-rated health in 2008: according to two-level multiple regression analysis using explanatory variables derived from 2003–07, simultaneously adjusting for between (contextual) and within (Family-based design–‘compositional’) household social capital measures ( N = 6900)

From: Testing the association between social capital and health over time: a family-based design

Explanatory variables

Poor self-rated health in 2008

ORs (95% CI)

Generalized trust–between HHs

Mean value Traditional (contextual) ML design

1.29 (1.21-1.37)

Generalized trust–within HHs

Difference from the Mean Family-based design (compositional)

1.11 (1.02-1.20)

Social participation–between HHs

Mean value Traditional (contextual) ML design

1.07 (0.97-1.18)

Social participation–within HHs

Difference from the Mean Family-based design (compositional)

0.97 (0.89-1.06)

Age (years)

16–34

1.0

35–44

1.39 (1.15-1.67)

45–54

1.80 (1.49-2.17)

55–64

1.41 (1.16-1.72)

65 +

1.48 (1.16-1.88)

Gender

Male

1.0

Female

0.76 (0.68-0.86)

Household income–size weighted

Per £1000 increase

0.99 (0.99-1.00)

Employment status

Employed

1.0

Full time student

1.16 (0.97-1.40)

Retired

1.84 (1.52-2.24)

Unemployed

3.02 (2.51-3.64)

Education achieved

Undergraduate or higher

1.0

Year 13

1.11 (0.93-1.32)

Year 11

1.00 (0.84-1.18)

No formal qualifications

1.52 (1.26-1.83)

Smoking status

Never a smoker

1.0

Intermittent smoker

1.47 (1.22-1.76)

 

Always a smoker

1.46 (1.26-1.69)

  1. Source: The British Household Panel Survey, Waves M, O, Q & R (2003, 05, 07 & 08).
  2. Reference group = 1.0.
  3. HH = Household.
  4. ML = Multilevel.