Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
19 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - nicole reilly |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
19 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patricia Dietz |
19 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - joseph canterino |
7 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Fisher |
21 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - nicole reilly |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patricia Dietz |
12 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - joseph canterino |
27 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Fisher |
18 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - nicole reilly |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
18 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
12 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Fisher |
30 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - nicole reilly |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
21 Jun 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
4 Jul 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-632 |
You can find further information about peer review here.