Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
9 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rachel RODGERS |
13 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Miranda Pallan |
5 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Zandile Mchiza |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Miranda Pallan |
19 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rachel RODGERS |
12 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Zandile Mchiza |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
12 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
12 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Zandile Mchiza |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
20 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Zandile Mchiza |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
20 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
25 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Zandile Mchiza |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
25 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
6 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-433 |
You can find further information about peer review here.