Skip to main content
Download PDF

How is parental education associated with infant and young child feeding in Bangladesh? a systematic literature review

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 510 (2023) Cite this article

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 25 September 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Education is expected to bring about positive behavioral changes which could lead to improved health behaviors. Parental education is a primary determinant of child health and development. However, some evidence showed inverse associations between high parental education and recommended infant and young child feeding (IYCF) in Bangladesh. How the association of parental education differs with specific IYCF components has not been reviewed. Therefore, the role of parental education on optimal IYCF practices in Bangladesh appears to be inconclusive. The objective of this review is to summarize how parental education is associated with IYCF practices in Bangladesh.

Method

This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar. Record searching, study selection, and data extraction was performed using Endnote online and Covidence tool, respectively. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment of the included studies.

Results

Out of 414 initial hits, 34 studies were included for this review. Of the included studies, 32 were cross-sectional, one was a randomized controlled trial, and one was a retrospective cohort. Most of the studies (n = 24) were nationally representative whereas 10 studies had populations from district and sub-district level. Included studies considered different IYCF-related indicators, including breastfeeding (n = 22), complementary feeding (n = 8), both breastfeeding and complementary feeding (n = 2), both breastfeeding and bottle feeding (n = 1), and pre-lacteal feeding (n = 1). Parental education was found to be positively associated with complementary feeding practices. However, the role of parental education on breastfeeding, in general, was ambiguous. High parental education was associated with bottle-feeding practices and no initiation of colostrum.

Conclusion

Public health interventions need to focus not only on non- and/or low-educated parents regarding complementary feeding but also on educated mothers for initiation of colostrum and proper breastfeeding practices.

Trial registration

This systematic review is registered to PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/) with registration ID: CRD42022355465.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices are associated with the development and nutritional status of children and, ultimately, impact their health in later life [1]. Globally, inappropriate IYCF practices lead to childhood undernutrition which causes approximately 2.7 million child deaths annually, representing 45% of all child deaths [2]. More than 823,000 under-five deaths could be prevented every year in 75 lower middle-income countries if all children below 23 months were optimally breastfed [3]. Therefore, IYCF is a key area for child survival and promoting healthy growth and development [2].

According to the latest recommendations by the World Health Organization (WHO), optimal IYCF practices consist of 17 indicators of which six are related to breastfeeding, nine are related to complementary feeding, and two are related to other aspects. These indicators are: 1) ever breastfed, 2) early initiation of breastfeeding, 3) exclusively breastfed for the first two days after birth, 4) exclusive breastfeeding under six months, 5) mixed milk feeding under six months, 6) continued breastfeeding 12–23 months, 7) introduction of solid, semi-solid, or soft foods 6–8 months, 8) minimum dietary diversity 6–23 months, 9) minimum meal frequency 6–23 months, 10) minimum milk feeding frequency for non-breastfed children 6–23 months, 11) minimum acceptable diet 6–23 months, 12) egg and/or flesh food consumption 6–23 months, 13) sweet beverage consumption 6–23 months, 14) unhealthy food consumption 6–23 months, 15) zero vegetable or fruit consumption 6–23 months, 16) bottle feeding 0–23 months, and 17) infant feeding area graphs [1]. The WHO has defined each of the indicators to support consistency in IYCF practices terminology and measurement [1]. Indicators such as consumption of iron-rich or iron-fortified foods, age-appropriate breastfeeding, predominant breastfeeding under six months, and duration of breastfeeding were previously used but have been excluded from the latest recommendations [1].

IYCF practices are associated with parental, family, social, and policy level factors. Some common factors include parental age, education, employment and wealth status, and supportive policies (and their implementation) for working parents [4,5,6]. However, parental education is a particularly prominent factor because education increases health seeking behavior [7], decreases morbidity [8] and mortality [9], and fosters good health [10]. Education also leads to an uptake of better care practices [11] and can bring about positive behavioral change that can contribute to good health [12]. Furthermore, parental education is associated with the overall nutritional status and well-being of their children [13].

In Bangladesh, 34% of children 6–23 months of age are fed in accordance with the recommended IYCF practices [14]. In addition, 65% of children under the age of six months are exclusively breastfed [14]. Bangladesh has achieved commendable success in reducing child undernutrition [15]. This happened despite the absence of any strong nationwide nutrition programs and interventions [16]. Researchers showed that this achievement was primarily due to nutrition-sensitive factors and an improvement in overall socioeconomic status, where parental education is considered one of the major contributors [16,17,18,19]. Despite expected positive influence of parental education on IYCF practices, existing evidence from literature shows some incongruous association between parents’ education and their IYCF practices in Bangladesh. For example, Al Mamun et al. (2022) [20] found that exclusive breastfeeding was higher among mothers with high educational attainments compared to illiterate mothers whereas Hossain et al. (2018) [21] found that highly educated mothers had lower odds of exclusive breastfeeding than their counterparts. Furthermore, the practices of providing breast milk or milk products and ensuring at least four food groups and minimum meal frequency among mothers who completed at least secondary education level remained the same (47.5%) both in 2007 and 2017 [14, 22] despite improvements in maternal literacy rate. Moreover, the rate of bottle-feeding practice and providing infant formula was higher among educated mothers compared to non- and less educated mothers as shown in two nationally representative reports [23, 24]. Therefore, a systematic review could help elucidate the impact of parental education on IYCF practices based on available evidence in Bangladesh.

This study could be useful to understand the need of and formulate IYCF interventions specific for parents with different educational attainments. The findings of this review could help inform IYCF policymaking not only in Bangladesh but also in countries with similar context in Southeast Asia and other lower middle-income countries where an educational transition is ongoing.

Theoretical basis

Theories help explain the mechanism of how parental education could influence IYCF practices. For instance, social cognitive theory asserts that human behavior, cognitive factors, and environmental factors influence each other through ongoing, reciprocal interactions [25]. In the context of IYCF, mothers/parents who have more knowledge on and positive attitudes toward IYCF recommendations would be expected to engage in recommended IYCF practices, given that they have the necessary skills, sufficient self-efficacy, and are supported by social norms. Education can play a significant role in strengthening cognitive and behavioral factors. For instance, institution-based formal education can greatly influence a person’s cognitive factors by shaping knowledge, attitudes, and expectations of behaviors such as IYCF [26]. Similarly, education helps individuals develop practical and intellectual skills and apply knowledge, cultivating their sense of self-efficacy [27, 28]. These cognitive and behavioral factors of an individual could subsequently influence other people and shape social norms [25]. By increasing one’s community access and influence on others, education could further influence environmental factors [29]. According to social cognitive theory, one would thus anticipate mothers/parents with higher levels of education to demonstrate better IYCF practices than less educated mothers/parents.

A mother’s cognitive, behavioral, and environmental factors are important to consider when examining IYCF practices. However, they may be insufficient, particularly in cases where higher education is correlated with poor IYCF. Positioning the relationship between (parental) education and IYCF practices within models of social determinants of health can provide valuable insights. The Dahlgren-Whitehead model [30] is composed of four interdependent layers that illustrate the main influences on health: individual lifestyle factors; social and community networks; living and working conditions; and general socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental conditions. Education is one aspect of a person’s material and social conditions in which they live and work and can greatly impact the individual’s lifestyle. While education can certainly have protective potential in achieving optimal IYCF (as suggested by the theoretical perspectives discussed above), higher levels of (parental) education may interrelate with other health determinants in such a way that hinders proper IYCF practices. For example, an educated mother may have a sound understanding of IYCF practices but is unable to fully apply her knowledge due to her work environment and long working hours. As such, higher levels of parental education may reduce barriers to IYCF but are unlikely to remove them completely. In circumstances in which a higher education status gives rise to new IYCF barriers, the most rational-seeming option for parents may be the one that goes against individual knowledge and professional advice to protect the overall wellbeing of the family (i.e., remaining employed). Thus, even though higher education may be a protective factor at the individual level, the interconnected role that educational status plays with socioeconomic and environmental conditions may render parental education a risk factor for IYCF.

While the propositions of social cognitive theory imply the positive impact of education on maternal child feeding behavior, examining education and IYCF through multilevel models of health determinants highlights that behavioral outcomes could be unpredictable due to barriers at various structural levels.

Methods

This review is conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline [31] and is registered in PROESPERO (reg no: CRD42022355465).

Data sources and search strategy

A search string was developed to find relevant articles in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar (provided as supplementary material). After conducting database searches, titles and abstracts of the records were exported to the software Covidence (https://www.covidence.org/) for removing duplicates and screening.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

We fitted the PECO criteria of systematic review as follows: population (P) = parents of infants and young children in Bangladesh, exposure (E) = higher levels of educational attainment of the parents, comparator (C) = parents with lower educational attainments compared to their counterparts, and outcome (O) = IYCF practices according to international recommendations [1].

Following the search strategy, any relevant records published from January 1980 to August 2022 were collected and screened for inclusion. This timeframe was chosen to allow the inclusion of as many relevant records as possible. Preliminary and manual searching found no relevant records before 1980. We considered following inclusion criteria: 1) participants: children’s mother and/or father; 2) exposure or intervention: education; 3) comparison: parents with different educational status; 4) outcome: all IYCF practices; 5) publication date: any articles published before August 2022; 6) language: English; 7) study design: quantitative study design such as cross-sectional, randomized controlled trial, cohort, and case control; 8) other documents: other documents, except original articles and thesis dissertations, were not considered; and 9) impact assessment: parental education was included in the statistical model and the comparison among different education groups was presented. We considered all the IYCF indicators as mentioned by the WHO [1].

Selection process

Three reviewers (MAR, PB, and PS) independently conducted literature searching, screening of the titles and abstracts, and full text screening following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. At each stage, any controversy or disagreement regarding searching, inclusion, and exclusion of the records was independently settled by another reviewer (SS).

Data extraction

At least two reviewers (MAR, PB, and PS) independently extracted the data from the selected articles. The data extraction checklist includes questions regarding: 1) author and publication, 2) study type, 3) study population and sample size, 4) geographical location, 5) type of association between education and IYCF practices (positive or negative), 6) comparison among different education groups as represented by odds ratio, regression coefficient, relative risks, or correlation coefficients, confidence intervals, and 7) level of significance (p-value). Data extraction was carried out using an Excel (Microsoft Corporation, 2022) spreadsheet. Finally, data was synthesized into a summary table.

Quality assessment and addressing the risk of bias

Quality of the included studies was assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa scale following the assessment criteria for cross-sectional, randomized control trail, and cohort studies (supplementary material) independently by at least two reviewers. Any discrepancy in decision making was independently resolved by another reviewer.

Terminologies

We defined a “positive association” as the correlation of high parental education with good IYCF practices. A “negative association” was defined as high parental education being correlated with poor IYCF practices. Likewise, a “positively consistent association” was defined as a positive correlation between IYCF practices and level of parental education, and a “negatively consistent association” was defined as a negative correlation between these.

Results

A total of 414 records were primarily retrieved through searching the databases. Out of these, 34 studies were included in this review. The PRISMA diagram showing the selection process of the included studies is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Selection process of the included studies

Full size image

Characteristics of the included studies

The included studies were published across a broad time range, with the oldest study having been published in 1981 [32]. Of the 34 included studies, 32 were cross-sectional studies, one was a retrospective longitudinal [33], and one was a randomized controlled trial [34]. Eleven studies considered parental (both parents) education [6, 21, 33, 35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42] and the remaining 23 studies considered only maternal education, all in relation to IYCF practices. Of the former eleven, nine studies separately considered father’s and mother’s education, and the remaining two studies [38, 39] considered both parents’ education together while analyzing their data. Twenty-four studies had a nationally representative sample size. Among the remaining ten, one was conducted in a defined area of north Bengal covering the districts Rangpur and Gaibandha [34] and another one in a defined area of Gaibandha [43]. Another study was conducted at a hospital in Dhaka [44]. Six studies were conducted at the sub-district level, and one at the district level (Rajshahi district). Among the included studies, the smallest sample size was 400 [20] and the largest sample size was 34,811 [45]. The characteristics of the included studies have been summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics and quality of the included studies
Full size table

After data extraction, the association between parental education and IYCF practices is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Association between parental education & child feeding in Bangladesh according to included articles
Full size table

Early initiation of breastfeeding

Twelve studies focused on the early initiation of breastfeeding [35, 38,39,40, 44, 51, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 61], and of them one focused on colostrum feeding [35]. Of these, eight studies found positive associations of education with the early initiation of breastfeeding [38,39,40, 44, 54, 56, 58, 60]. These associations were positively consistent with the level of educational attainment, i.e., the association (e.g., odds ratio) increased with increasing level of education, except in the study of Sakib et al. (2021) [58]. Four studies [38,39,40, 54] considered both parents’ education and found that early initiation of breastfeeding is higher among comparatively highly-educated parents. Among these four studies, two did not mention the level of parental education, and the margin when differentiating between the educated and uneducated group in terms of their educational attainment was uncertain [38, 39]. For example, these studies presented the likelihood of early initiation of breastfeeding when any one or both parents were educated versus when both parents were uneducated. The remaining two studies categorized the education level as ‘no education’, ‘primary education’, and ‘ ≥ secondary education’ [40, 54].

Three studies found negative associations between maternal education and early initiation of breastfeeding [51, 52, 61]. All three studies considered maternal education only. In all cases, mothers with lower education categories compared to their counterparts were considered as the reference group. Among these, one study found a negatively consistent association [51], another study found an inconsistent association [52] and the final study considered only two groups (< secondary and ≥ secondary education) and found a negative association [61]. Ahmed et al. (1999) [35] investigated the impact of parental education on colostrum feeding and found a positive association with 1–5 years of parental education. However, the association was negative when parental education was more than or equal to six years, compared to the parents with no education as the reference category.

Exclusive breastfeeding

Nine studies investigated the impact of parental education on exclusive breastfeeding status of infants [20, 21, 33, 35, 48, 49, 54, 57, 61]. Among these, Ahmed et al. (1999) [35], Hossain et al., 2018 [21], and Rahman et al. (2020) [33] considered both the father’s and mother’s education. The remaining studies considered only maternal education. Four studies found positive associations between maternal education and exclusive breastfeeding [20, 54, 57, 61]. Compared to the reference category (illiterate mothers), the association was found to be positively consistent by Rana et al. (2020) [57], although Al Mamun et al. (2022) [20] found an inconsistent association among the comparison groups such as illiterate mothers, mothers with primary, secondary, higher secondary, graduation level, and Madrasha education.

Three studies found negative associations between parental education and exclusive breastfeeding [21, 35, 48]. Ahmed et al. (1999) [35] considered mothers with no education as the reference category whereas Hossain et al. (2018) [21] considered mothers with higher education as the reference category. Ahmed et al. (1999) [35] found that the association was negatively inconsistent for both mothers’ and fathers’ education. For example, compared to the parents with no education, parents with 1–5 and ≥ 6 years of education were less likely to breastfeed exclusively. Basnet et al. (2020) [48] found a negatively consistent association between years of maternal schooling and exclusive breastfeeding.

Rahman et al. (2020) [33] found that compared to mothers with secondary or higher education, exclusive breastfeeding increased for mothers with primary education (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.89,1.23) and mothers with no education (OR: 1.02: 95% CI: 0.63,1.66). But in the case of fathers, the association is inconsistent. Compared to the fathers with secondary or higher education, exclusive breastfeeding increased for children whose fathers had primary level of education but decreased for fathers with no education.

The association did not follow any specific direction for the study conducted by Dintyala (2020) [49] who found that the odds of exclusive breastfeeding was higher for the mothers with primary and secondary education but lower for the mothers with no education when considering the mothers with higher education as reference category.

Duration of breastfeeding

Seven studies investigated the impact of parental education on the breastfeeding duration [6, 32, 36, 41, 46, 50, 61]. Except the study of Tariqujjaman et al. (2022) [61], all the studies found a negative association. However, Tariqujjaman et al. (2022) [61] did not find the association statistically significant (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.99, 1.03). Akter & Rahman (2010) [36] and Akter & Rahman (2010) [46] found that mothers’ education is negatively consistent in relation to the duration of breastfeeding. Compared to the mothers with higher education, mothers with no education, primary education, or secondary education had lower risk of breastfeeding cessation with statistically significant associations in all cases. Jain & Bongaarts (1981) [32] also found a similar association of mothers’ education with the breastfeeding duration. Compared to the mothers with no education, mothers with primary, secondary, or more education had shorter mean duration of breastfeeding.

Giashuddin & Kabir (2014) [50] found mothers with primary education had a slightly lower relative risk (RR = 0.96) of stopping breastfeeding than the mothers with no education. On the other hand, the risk of breastfeeding cessation was higher among the mothers with secondary (RR = 1.19) and higher (RR = 1.25) education. Islam et al. (2019) (6) also found that mothers with primary and secondary education had 3% and 2% higher likelihood of breastfeeding continuation, respectively, compared to the mothers with no education; however, the likelihood was found to be 25% lower for the mothers with higher education.

Parental (both father and mother) education was considered by Akter & Rahman (2010) [36] and Islam et al. (2019) [6]. In both cases, maternal education was negatively associated with breastfeeding duration; however, Akter & Rahman (2010) [36] found that fathers’ education had no impact (OR = 1.00 for all education categories with p > 0.01) on duration of breastfeeding, whereas Islam et al. (2019) [6] found a negative association between paternal education and breastfeeding continuation.

Khan et al. (2020) [41] investigated the tendency of breastfeeding termination among mothers with different levels of education and children’s fathers with different levels of education and found that the likelihood of early termination of breastfeeding was consistently positive with the increase in maternal education.

In case of the fathers, Khan et al. (2020) [41] found that, compared to the children of fathers with no education, children whose fathers had completed primary education are less likely to experience terminated breastfeeding earlier while children whose fathers had secondary or higher educational level are more likely to experience terminated breastfeeding earlier.

Complementary feeding

Thirteen studies investigated the impact of parental education on complementary feeding practices [5, 20, 34, 37, 42, 45, 47, 48, 53,54,55, 59, 61]. Of these, three studies considered both father’s and mother’s education [37, 42, 54]. In general, all the studies found that parental education was positively associated with complementary feeding practices, such as ensuring introduction of semi-solid, solid, and soft foods at the age of 6–8 months, minimum dietary diversity, minimum meal frequency, and minimum acceptable diet. Tariqujjaman et al. (2022) [61] found that maternal education had no association with introduction of solid, semi-solid, and soft foods (OR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.93,1.05) whereas Basnet et al. (2020) [48] found a negative association between maternal education and dietary diversity.

Meanwhile, Al Mamun et al. (2022) [20] found both positive and negative associations among groups with different educational attainment as compared with the reference group (illiterate mothers). For example, the odds of timely initiation of complementary feeding was higher among mothers with primary (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.49, 2.84), graduate (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.12, 14.80), and Madrasha education (OR = 2.91, 95% CI = 0.38, 22.34), but lower among the mothers with SSC/Dakhil (secondary level) (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.29, 1.76) and HSC/Alim (higher secondary level) (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.10, 4.12) education. A similarly positive association was found by Mihrshahi et al. (2010) [54]. Chowdhury et al. (2016) [37] found adequate complementary feeding to be positively associated with paternal education but negatively associated with maternal education. Nguyen et al. (2013) [55] and Basnet et al. (2020) [48] calculated dietary diversity as part of complementary feeding practices and found positive association in relation to maternal education.

Bottle feeding, pre-lacteal feeding, and iron rich/fortified foods

One study investigated the association between parental education and bottle-feeding practices [54] and found that bottle feeding practices are more likely for children whose fathers had higher levels of education compared to fathers with no educational attainments. Tariqujjaman et al. (2022) [61] investigated if the provision of iron rich/fortified foods is associated with maternal education and found the association to be positive (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.12). Sundaram et al. (2013) [43] found that pre-lacteal feeding or early neonatal feeding was more prevalent among mothers who did not pass class nine compared to those who passed class nine. On the other hand, pre-lacteal feeding is almost the same among both illiterate and literate mothers.

Quality of the included studies

For each of the included studies, detailed scoring for each item/criterion according to Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) is provided as supplementary material. For the 32 cross-sectional studies, the score ranged from 7 to 10 out of a total score of 10 (Table 1). Of them, four studies had a score between 7–8 which is considered good, and other 28 studies had a score between 9–10 which is considered very good according to NOS assessment criteria. For one randomized controlled trial and one cohort study the score was 8 and 6, respectively.

Apart from NOS assessment criteria, we also checked studies that reported how the multicollinearity issues were estimated/handled. Only five studies reported how the multicollinearity was estimated. Among them, two studies reported variance inflation factor (VIF) [47, 61] and three studies reported that standard error (SE) was used to estimate multicollinearity [5, 51, 56]. Regarding predictability of the statistical model, only two studies reported the R2 value. For Hossain et al. (2018) [21], R2 value of the statistical model was 0.885 whereas for Jain & Bongaarts (1981) [32], the value was 0.57. In four studies, the estimated association was not adjusted for other variables such as gender of the children, employment status, type of delivery, and household wealth index [35, 40, 54, 58]. In the study of Mihrshahi et al. (2010) [54] four IYCF indicators––including not timely initiation of breastfeeding, not exclusively breastfeeding, bottle feeding, and not timely complementary feeding––were considered; however, the estimated association was adjusted only for two outcome variables, including not exclusively breastfeeding and bottle-feeding practices.

Discussion

This study explores the pattern of associations between IYCF practices and parental education in Bangladesh. We found that parental education was both positively and negatively associated with IYCF, depending on the different IYCF components. For example, comparing the reference category with others, parental education, in general, was found to be positively associated with complementary feeding status [5, 20, 34, 37, 42, 45, 47, 48, 53, 55, 59, 61], but negatively associated with breastfeeding related indicators [6, 21, 32, 35, 36, 41, 46, 50,51,52, 61]. However, some studies also found positive association between parental education and breastfeeding related indicators [20, 33, 38, 39, 44, 49, 57, 60].

In this review, 34 studies were included of which 24 studies analyzed the datasets from nationally representative surveys (e.g., Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey). The remaining ten studies were conducted in different districts and sub-districts in Bangladesh, considering representative samples of their target population. Included studies were conducted in a wide range of periods extending from 1981 to 2022. Therefore, the evidence is substantial to draw a logical conclusion regarding the association between parental education and IYCF practices in Bangladesh, considering the representativeness of data.

A considerable socio-economic transition, especially an increase in literacy rate, has occurred in the last four decades in Bangladesh. The adult literacy rate was 29% in 1981, 35% in 1991, 47% in 2001, 59% in 2011, and 75% in 2020 [62]. Additionally, access to education, particularly for women, and female literacy rate have improved significantly [63]. Besides, notable empowerment of women has occurred through their growing employment rate within this period [64]. Apart from these, access to information through the printed, electronic, and social media has increased [45]. Despite these socio-economic changes, IYCF practices do not show a proportionate improvement over this time period, regardless of development not only in maternal education but also in household wealth quintile of mothers [14, 22]. In our review, for example, Jain & Bongaarts (1981) [32] found that the duration of breastfeeding was negatively associated with an increase in maternal education. Similar association was found by a recent study conducted by Islam et al. (2019) [6] where mothers with higher level of education were found to have less breastfeeding duration than mothers with no education.

A fluctuation is observed in IYCF practices in the last three decades [14]. The exclusive breastfeeding rate has increased to 65% in 2017–18 from 45.9% in 1993–94. However, our findings show that the odds of exclusive breastfeeding were higher for a mother with lower educational attainment than her counterparts [21, 35]. This implies that the impact of increasing literacy rate among women on breastfeeding is ambiguous. In addition, compared to no maternal education, higher educational attainment was found to be positively associated (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.30, 3.64) with bottle feeding practices [54]. In contrast to exclusive breastfeeding and bottle feeding practices, parental education was found to be positively associated with complementary feeding of children over time according to available records [5, 20, 47].

Why parental education is positively associated with complementary feeding practices but negatively associated with breastfeeding-related indicators requires further investigation. Educated mothers are more likely to be employed and have control over resources and therefore have a say in family decision making. However, employment could sometimes be a barrier to optimum IYCF practices. For example, an employed mother is less likely to practice breastfeeding if she has to spend a longer period of time at the workplace [21, 49]. Hence, she could use bottle feeding as a proxy for breastfeeding, thereby shortening breastfeeding duration. Bottle feeding allows mothers to work and can be performed by someone other than the mother [65].

Education is a proxy indicator of socioeconomic position which could be related to exposure to advertisement and financial capabilities to buy infant formula [66]; therefore, it can facilitate accessing breastmilk substitutes and subsequently bottle-feeding practices which could lead to early breastfeeding cessation as found by Akter et al. (2010) [36].

In addition, in recent years, educated mothers in Bangladesh are more inclined to undergo cesarean section (C-section) delivery [67], which is 77.6% among women with secondary or higher education [68]. C-section delivery is one of the major risk factors for not initiating early breastfeeding immediately after birth [69,70,71]. C-section deliveries are conducted using anesthesia. Hence, it becomes very difficult for mothers to recover within one hour of birth and begin breastfeeding. In addition, maternal tiredness, respiratory distress among newborns, and post-surgical procedures may contribute to not initiating breastfeeding within one hour after delivery [39]. These might be the reasons why parental, particularly maternal, education is negatively associated with early initiation of breastfeeding.

In addition, working mothers have higher levels of income than unemployed mothers, and thereby greater access to better choices of food [47]. Researchers found that employed mothers have better knowledge on child health and nutrition, which could influence feeding practices positively [47, 72, 73], provide improved access to related information [72], and are better at seeking healthcare [38] than their unemployed counterparts. However, the greater wealth and agency of educated mothers also means that they have increased access to artificial breast milk substitutes and processed foods, which can be detrimental to their offspring [35, 46].

This review found that mothers with lower educational attainment had better breastfeeding practices than those with more education. One reason behind this phenomenon, as mentioned by some of the reviewed studies, is the difficulty of breastfeeding for the educated mothers engaging in full-time employment [6, 21]. Considering the perspective of women employed in the ready-made garments (RMG) sector could be a useful example in understanding why employment and educational attainment is not fully supportive of proper IYCF practices. This sector plays an important role in the economy of Bangladesh, employing more women than any other sector [74]. Among these, 45.3% of garment workers have at least primary education, 29.8% have an education level less than SSC (secondary school certificate), and 24.3% have a level of complete SSC (secondary) education [75]. Researchers showed that approximately 76% of mothers working in the RMG sector knew that the babies should be exclusively breastfed up to six months of their age, though only four out of ten (44%) were found to practice exclusive breastfeeding [76]. Translating the knowledge into practice is difficult for the mothers working in the RMG sector due to structural barriers at the workplace, and most mothers introduce formula feeding as early as two months after birth [19, 77, 78]. Maternity leave in Bangladesh is not strictly maintained and varies by types of employment, nursing breaks remain unofficial, and childcare facilities at workplaces are extremely scarce [19, 79]. Employed mothers also have increased household income and greater affordability and desirability for commercial breastmilk substitutes. Another potential cause is that employed mothers are more likely to introduce complementary food earlier, which leads to quicker termination of breastfeeding [80]. Meanwhile, uneducated mothers perceive breastfeeding as a cost-effective way to feed their babies compared to buying breast milk substitutes and other foods and thus have better breastfeeding practices compared to their counterparts [81].

In most of the studies, the researchers mainly explained how maternal education is associated with IYCF, whereas its association with paternal education was largely disregarded. However, educated women in Bangladesh tend to have educated husbands [82]. Therefore, even after considering the possible multicollinearity, the associations could be expected to be the same for paternal education. Like the employment of educated mothers, employment of educated fathers has influences on the child feeding practices. Employed fathers often cannot provide enough time in supporting mothers in child feeding [19] while it has been reported that mothers with supportive husbands are more likely to practice exclusive breastfeeding than their counterparts [83]. Our findings are consistent with the findings from other South Asian countries. Parental education was found to be negatively associated with optimal breastfeeding in studies conducted in India and Pakistan [81, 84,85,86,87]. The common reason behind this scenario is that educated mothers are more likely to be in employment than uneducated mothers; unsupportive working environments with no or limited breastfeeding opportunities could explain poor breastfeeding practices [88]. In contrast to the negative associations, other studies also found that parental education was positively associated with breastfeeding in South Asian countries [84, 87, 89,90,91,92,93,94]. According to these studies, the reason is probably because educated mothers are more likely to access healthcare messages, aware of healthy and timely child feeding practices, and more capable of making informed health related decisions [90, 91]. Furthermore, education plays a positive role in changing traditional beliefs, improving the attitudes of mothers, and perceiving the healthcare messages that catalyze the improved complementary feeding practices [39].

Proposed reasons for this relationship include socioeconomic differences in attitudes toward breastfeeding, improved health literacy and knowledge of breastfeeding benefits, higher self-efficacy, greater success in reaching educated women with breastfeeding-promoting messages, working in a job that allows continuing breastfeeding as well as overall greater social support for educated women [95,96,97]. However, it is difficult to argue that promoting maternal education is sufficient to improve IYCF practices when numerous structural and cultural barriers exist, including lack of funding for breastfeeding-promoting initiatives, violations of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes, and misalignment of regional or country-level scientific opinions with the WHO global recommendations on exclusive breastfeeding [98,99,100].

In summary, parental education seems to be positively associated with complementary feeding practices; however, in most of the cases, the association is negative for breastfeeding in Bangladesh despite that breastfeeding could entail considerable health expenditure savings, minimize economic loss, and result in various socio-economic benefits in the long run [101,102,103,104,105]. The authors therefore put forward investment into IYCF promotion and protection as a priority in Bangladesh considering the associated health and economic benefits.

Policy implications and recommendations

In Bangladesh, 19 policy documents in favor of IYCF promotion were identified [4]. However, substantial gaps in terms of putting policies into action, population coverage, inter-sectoral coordination, and engagement of the non-public sector were identified. The analysis also suggested a need for strategies to engage relevant stakeholders in implementation of these policies that support IYCF in Bangladesh. These suggestions are in consensus with our findings. For example, breastfeeding practices of employed mothers should be supported by policy implementation such as ensuring mandatory six-month maternity leave with full compensation, breastfeeding creches at workplaces, and adequate breastfeeding breaks. To promote breastfeeding and discourage breastmilk substitutes among educated mothers, innovative interventions using online platforms could be considered [106, 107].

On the other hand, complementary feeding practices were poor among mothers with lower educational attainment than their counterparts. Several steps could also be taken to improve this group's complementary feeding practices, including creating employment for uneducated mothers, strengthening existing nutrition interventions and services targeting uneducated and lower socio-economic mothers, increasing community outreach to reach a maximum number of underprivileged mothers, and demonstrating how to prepare proper complementary diet using locally available and affordable food items. Finally, the long-term solution considers reducing the socio-economic inequities so that mothers get access to resources for improving their IYCF practices through education and employment.

Strengths and limitations

This is the first systematic review to observe the association between parental education and IYCF practices in Bangladesh. Additionally, it is the first of its kind in the South Asian context. In this review, most of the included studies considered nationally representative data (BDHS data), and a number of variables were adjusted for during analysis; therefore, the likelihood of estimated association is expected to provide a reliable and valid estimate regarding association between exposure and outcome.

Several limitations could also be mentioned. Only four databases were searched to collect the evidence. Meta-analysis was not performed; therefore, conclusions are based on findings from individual studies. Finally, the findings could be generalized in similar contexts but not in other settings, for example high-income countries.

Conclusions

According to findings of the majority of the included studies, parental education is positively associated with complementary feeding practices but negatively associated with breastfeeding-related indicators. Therefore, the role of parental education in breastfeeding their infants and young children is ambiguous in the Bangladeshi context. Common reasons behind educated mothers not ensuring optimum breastfeeding include their engagement in employment and unsupportive environments for breastfeeding. Both parental education and standard IYCF practices are equally important for national development. Therefore, it is important to put policies into action so that educated mothers can ensure optimum breastfeeding and uneducated mothers get access to resources for ensuring recommended complementary feeding.

Availability of data and materials

All the associated data is provided as supplementary material.

Change history

References

  1. WHO & UNICEF. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices Definitions and measurement methods . 2021 (Cited 2022 Sep 13). Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240018389.

  2. WHO. Infant and young child feeding . 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding.

  3. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Vol. 387, The Lancet. Lancet Publishing Group; 2016. p. 475–90.

  4. Rasheed S, Roy SK, Das S, Chowdhury SN, Iqbal M, Akter SM, et al. Policy content and stakeholder network analysis for infant and young child feeding in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2017;13:17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kabir I, Khanam M, Agho KE, Mihrshahi S, Dibley MJ, Roy SK. Determinants of inappropriate complementary feeding practices in infant and young children in Bangladesh: Secondary data analysis of Demographic Health Survey 2007. Matern Child Nutr. 2012;8(SUPPL. 1):11–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Islam M, Afroja S, Biswas A, Khan MS, Khandker S. Influence of socio-demographic factors on the breastfeeding period of women in bangladesh: A polytomous logistic regression model. Family Medicine and Primary Care Review. 2019;21(3):223–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guo F, Xiong H, Qi X, Takesue R, Zou BMS, He PhDQ, et al. Maternal health-seeking behavior and associated factors in the democratic republic of the Congo. Health Educ Behav. 2021;48(5):700–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adler NE, Ostrove JM. Socioeconomic status and health: what we know and what we don’t. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:3–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ross CE, Wu CL. The links between education source. Am Sociol Review. 1995;60(5):719–45.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yamashita T, Kunkel SR. An international comparison of the association among literacy, education, and health across the United States, Canada, Switzerland, Italy, Norway, and Bermuda: Implications for health disparities. Vol. 20, Journal of Health Communication. Bellwether Publishing, Ltd.; 2015. p. 406–15.

  11. Feinstein L, Sabates R, Anderson TM, Sorhaindo A, Hammond C. What are the effects of education on health. In: Measuring the effects of education on health and civic engagement: Proceedings of the Copenhagen symposium. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2006. p. 171–354. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=32e9079959269c5af50f7ad11a74712968cb01cb.

  12. Hahn RA, Truman BI. Education improves public health and promotes health equity. Int J Health Serv. 2015;45(4):657–78.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Vollmer S, Bommer C, Krishna A, Harttgen K, Subramanian S. The association of parental education with childhood undernutrition in low- and middle-income countries: Comparing the role of paternal and maternal education. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(1):312–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. NIPORT, ICF. Bangladesh demographic and health survey 2017–18 [Internet]. Dhaka, Bangladesh & Rockville, Maryland, USA; 2020 (Cited 2022 Sep 13). Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-FR344-DHS-Final-Reports.cfm.

  15. Chowdhury MRK, Rahman MS, Khan MMH, Mondal MNI, Rahman MM, Billah B. Risk factors for child malnutrition in Bangladesh: A multilevel analysis of a nationwide population-based survey. J Pediatr. 2016;1(172):194-201.e1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Headey D, Hoddinott J, Park S. Drivers of nutritional change in four South Asian countries: A dynamic observational analysis. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;1(12):210–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chowdhury AMR, Bhuiya A, Chowdhury ME, Rasheed S, Hussain Z, Chen LC. The Bangladesh paradox: Exceptional health achievement despite economic poverty. Lancet. 2013;382:1734–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Headey D, Hoddinott J, Ali D, Tesfaye R, Dereje M. The other asian enigma: explaining the rapid reduction of undernutrition in Bangladesh. World Dev. 2015;1(66):749–61.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hossain MB, Khan MHR. Role of parental education in reduction of prevalence of childhood undernutrition in Bangladesh. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(10):1845–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. al Mamun MA, Saha S, Li J, Binta A Ghani R, al Hasan SM, Begum A. Child feeding practices of childbearing mothers and their household food insecurity in a coastal region of Bangladesh. Inquiry (United States). 2022;59:1–12.

  21. Hossain M, Islam A, Kamarul T, Hossain G. Exclusive breastfeeding practice during first six months of an infant’s life in Bangladesh: A country based cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, Macro International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2007. Dhaka, Bangladesh and Calverton, Maryland, USA; 2009.

  23. James P Grant School of Public Health and National Nutrition Services. State of food security and nutrition in Bangladesh 2015. Dhaka: James P Grant School of Public Health and National Nutrition Services; 2016.

  24. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) and UNICEF Bangladesh. Progotir Pathey, Bangladesh Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2019, Survey Findings Report. Dhaka: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS); 2019.

  25. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of social referencing. In: Feinman S, editor. Social referencing and the social construction of reality in infancy. Boston: Springer; 1992. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/978-1-4899-2462-9_8.

  26. Burger K. How does early childhood care and education affect cognitive development? An international review of the effects of early interventions for children from different social backgrounds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 2010;25:140–65.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schunk DH. Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychol Sch. 1985;22:208–23.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Camilli G, Vargas S, Ryan S, Barnett WS. Meta-Analysis of the effects of early education interventions on cognitive and social development. Teach Coll Rec. 2010;112(3):579–620.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jayaweera S. Women, Education and Empowerment in Asia. Gend Educ. 1997;9(4):411–24.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health: Institute for future studies; 1991. https://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10234/187797/GoeranD_Policies_and_strategies_to_promote_social_equity_in_health.pdf?sequence=1.

  31. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Jain AK, Bongaarts J. Breastfeeding: patterns, correlates, and fertility effects. Family Planning. 1981;12:79–99. Available from: http://www.jstor.org. http://0-www-jstor-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/stable/. Accessed: 07-12-201518:52UTC.

  33. Rahman A, Nomani D, Taneepanichskul S. Trends and determinants of ebf among adolescent children born to adolescent mothers in rural Bangladesh. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Campbell RK, Hurley KM, Shamim AA, Shaikh S, Chowdhury ZT, Mehra S, et al. Effect of complementary food supplementation on breastfeeding and home diet in rural Bangladeshi children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104(5):1450–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ahmed S, Parveen SD, Islam A. Infant Feeding practices in rural Bangladesh: Policy implications. J Trop Pediatr. 1999;45(1):37–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Akter S, Rahman MM. Duration of Breastfeeding and Its Correlates in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2010;28(6):595–601.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chowdhury MRK, Rahman MS, Khan MMH. Levels and determinants of complementary feeding based on meal frequency among children of 6 to 23 months in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):944.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Sen KK, Mallick TS, Bari W. Gender inequality in early initiation of breastfeeding in Bangladesh: A trend analysis. Int Breastfeed J. 2020;15(1):18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ahmmed F, Manik MMR. Trends in early initiation of breastfeeding in Bangladesh and a multilevel analysis approach to find its determinants. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5053.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Akter T, Dawson A, Sibbritt D. The determinants of essential newborn care for home births in Bangladesh. Public Health. 2016;1(141):7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Khan JR, Sheikh MT, Muurlink O. Breastfeeding termination and its determinants in Bangladesh: current status data modelling. Early Child Dev Care. 2020;190(16):2594–604.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Na M, Aguayo VM, Arimond M, Narayan A, Stewart CP. Stagnating trends in complementary feeding practices in Bangladesh: An analysis of national surveys from 2004–2014. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;1:14.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sundaram ME, Labrique AB, Mehra S, Ali H, Shamim AA, Klemm RDW, et al. Early neonatal feeding is common and associated with subsequent breastfeeding behavior in rural Bangladesh. J Nutr. 2013;143(7):1161–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hasan M, Hassan MN, Khan MSI, al Banna MH. Prevalence and Determinants of Early Initiation of Breastfeeding Among Mothers in Dhaka City, Bangladesh: a Cross-sectional Study. SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;2(12):2792–8.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Blackstone S, Sanghvi T. A comparison of minimum dietary diversity in Bangladesh in 2011 and 2014. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(4):e12609.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Akter S, Rahman MdM. The Determinants of Early Cessation of Breastfeeding in Bangladesh. World Health Popul. 2010;11(4):5–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ali NB, Tahsina T, Emdadul Hoque DM, Hasan MM, Iqbal A, Huda TM, et al. Association of food security and other socioeconomic factors with dietary diversity and nutritional statuses of children aged 6–59 months in rural Bangladesh. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):e0221929.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Basnet S, Frongillo EA, Nguyen PH, Moore S, Arabi M. Associations of maternal resources with care behaviours differ by resource and behaviour. Matern Child Nutr. 2020;16(3):e12977.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Dintyala SSD. A study of the relationship between maternal antenatal visitation and adherence to exclusive breastfeeding at 6th month [Master’s Thesis ]. [North Carolina]: The University of North Carolina; 2020.

  50. Giashuddin MS, Kabir M. Duration of breast-feeding in Bangladesh. Indian J Med Res. 2004;119:267.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Islam MdA, Mamun ASMA, Murad Hossain M, Bharati P, Saw A, Lestrel PE, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with early initiation of breastfeeding among Bangladeshi mothers: a nationwide cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215733.

  52. Karim F, Salam Khan AN, Tasnim F, Kabir Chowdhury MA, Billah SM, Karim T, et al. Prevalence and determinants of initiation of breastfeeding within one hour of birth: An analysis of the Bangladesh demographic and health survey, 2014, vol. 14. PLoS ONE: Public Library of Science; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Khan JR, Awan N, Sheikh MT. A multilevel and spatial analysis of the infant and young child feeding practices and associated factors among the under-2 aged children in bangladesh. Child Care Pract. 2022;28(2):178–95.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mihrshahi S, Kabir I, Roy SK, Agho KE, Senarath U, Dibley MJ, et al. Determinants of infant and young child feeding practices in Bangladesh: Secondary data analysis of Demographic and Health Survey 2004. Food Nutr Bull. 2010;31(2):295–313.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Nguyen PH, Avula R, Ruel MT, Saha KK, Ali D, Tran LM, et al. Maternal and child dietary diversity are associated in bangladesh, vietnam, and ethiopia. J Nutr. 2013;143(7):1176–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rahman M, Haque SE, Zahan S, Islam O. Noninstitutional Births and Newborn Care Practices Among Adolescent Mothers in Bangladesh. JOGNN - J Obstet, Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011;40(3):262–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Rana MM, Islam MR, Karim MR, Islam AZ, Haque MA, Shahiduzzaman M, et al. Knowledge and practices of exclusive breastfeeding among mothers in rural areas of Rajshahi district in Bangladesh: A community clinic based study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(5):e0232027.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Sakib MS, Ripon Rouf ASM, Tanny TF. Determinants of early initiation of breastfeeding practices of newborns in Bangladesh: evidence from Bangladesh demographic and health survey. Nutr Metab Insights. 2021;14:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Senarath U, Agho KE, Akram DES, Godakandage SSP, Hazir T, Jayawickrama H, et al. Comparisons of complementary feeding indicators and associated factors in children aged 6–23 months across five South Asian countries. Matern Child Nutr. 2012;8(SUPPL. 1):89–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Shahjahan M, Ahmed MR, Rahman MM, Afroz A. Factors affecting newborn care practices in Bangladesh. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26(1):13–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Tariqujjaman M, Hasan MM, Mahfuz M, Hossain M, Ahmed T. Association between Mother’s Education and Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices in South Asia. Nutrients. 2022;14(7):1514.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. World Bank. Literacy rate, adult total (% of people ages 15 and above) [Internet]. 2022 (Cited 2022 Sep 13). Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.ADT.LITR.ZS?locations=BD.

  63. World Bank. Literacy rate, adult female (% of female ages 15 and above) - Bangladesh [Internet]. 2022 (Cited 2022 Sep 13). Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.ADT.LITR.FE.ZS?locations=BD.

  64. World Bank. Employment to population ratio, 15+, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate) - Bangladesh. 2022 (Cited 2022 Sep 13). Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.EMP.TOTL.SP.FE.ZS?end=2021&locations=BD&start=1991&view=chart.

  65. Thomas JS, Yu EA, Tirmizi N, Owais A, Das SK, Rahman S, et al. Maternal knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy in relation to intention to exclusively breastfeed among pregnant women in rural bangladesh. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(1):49–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Vestermark V, Hogdall CK, Plenov G, Birch M, Toftager-Larsen K. The duration of breast-feeding. Scand J SOC Med. 1991;19(2):105–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Hasan F, Alam MM, Hossain MG. Associated factors and their individual contributions to caesarean delivery among married women in Bangladesh: Analysis of Bangladesh demographic and health survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):433.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Ahmed MS, Islam M, Jahan I, Shaon IF. Multilevel analysis to identify the factors associated with caesarean section in Bangladesh: evidence from a nationally representative survey. Int Health. 2023;15(1):30–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Benedict RK, Craig HC, Torlesse H, Stoltzfus RJ. Trends and predictors of optimal breastfeeding among children 0–23 months, South Asia: Analysis of national survey data. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;1:14.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Hobbs AJ, Mannion CA, McDonald SW, Brockway M, Tough SC. The impact of caesarean section on breastfeeding initiation, duration and difficulties in the first four months postpartum. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Prior E, Santhakumaran S, Gale C, Philipps LH, Modi N, Hyde MJ. Breastfeeding after cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of world literature. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(5):1113–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Beyene M, Worku AG, Wassie MM. Dietary diversity, meal frequency and associated factors among infant and young children in Northwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1007.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Joshi PC, Angdembe MR, Das SK, Ahmed S, Faruque ASG, Ahmed T. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding and associated factors among mothers in rural Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. Int Breastfeed J. 2014;9(1):7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Hasan MT, Amin A, Chowdhury MU, Faizul Islam K, Huq SM, Parvin R, et al. Health sufferings, healthcare seeking behavior, awareness about health insurance, and health related rights of ready made garments workers in Bangladesh: Findings from a cross-sectional study. J Occup Health. 2021;63(1):e12256.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Fatema K, Natasha K, Ali L. Cardiovascular risk factors among Bangladeshi ready-made garment workers. J Public Health Afr. 2014;5(2):104–9.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Iqbal A. Knowledge and practices regarding infant and young child feeding among mothers working in readymade garments sector in bangladesh: A cross-sectional survey. Curr Research Nutri Food Sci. 2021;9(1):190–201.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Chen J, Xin T, Gaoshan J, Li Q, Zou K, Tan S, et al. The association between work related factors and breastfeeding practices among Chinese working mothers: A mixed-method approach. Int Breastfeed J. 2019;14(1):28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Hasan AMR, Smith G, Selim MA, Akter S, Khan NUZ, Sharmin T, et al. Work and breast milk feeding: a qualitative exploration of the experience of lactating mothers working in ready made garments factories in urban Bangladesh. Int Breastfeed J. 2020;15(1):93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Haider R, Begum S. Working women, maternity entitlements, and breastfeeding: a report from Bangladesh. J Hum Lact. 1995;11(4):273–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Khan MMI, Kabir MR. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Early Cessation of Exclusive Breastfeeding Practice in Noakhali, Bangladesh: A Mixed-Method Study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2021;1(58):e44-53.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Nishimura H, Krupp K, Gowda S, Srinivas V, Arun A, Madhivanan P. Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding in rural South India. Int Breastfeed J. 2018;13(1):40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Hahn Y, Nuzhat K, Yang HS. The effect of female education on marital matches and child health in Bangladesh. J Popul Econ. 2018;31(3):915–36.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Tan KL. Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding among infants under six months of age in peninsular malaysia. Int Breastfeed J. 2011;2:6.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ogbo FA, Dhami MV, Awosemo AO, Olusanya BO, Olusanya J, Osuagwu UL, et al. Regional prevalence and determinants of exclusive breastfeeding in India. Int Breastfeed J. 2019;14(1):20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Patel A, Badhoniya N, Khadse S, Senarath U, Agho KE, Dibley MJ, et al. Infant and young child feeding indicators and determinants of poor feeding practices in India: Secondary data analysis of National Family Health Survey 2005–06. Food Nutr Bull. 2010;31(2):314–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Malhotra R, Noheria A, Amir O, Ackerson LK, Subramanian Sv. Determinants of termination of breastfeeding within the first 2 years of life in India: evidence from the National Family Health Survey-2. Matern Child Nutr. 2008;4(3):181–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Arif S, Khan H, Aslam M, Farooq M. Factors influencing exclusive breastfeeding duration in Pakistan: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1998.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Skafida V. Juggling work and motherhood: The impact of employment and maternity leave on breastfeeding duration: A survival analysis on growing up in Scotland data. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16:519–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Acharya D, Singh JK, Kandel R, Park JH, Yoo SJ, Lee K. Maternal factors and the utilization of maternal care services associated with infant feeding practices among mothers in rural southern Nepal. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(11):1887.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Acharya P, Khanal V. The effect of mother’s educational status on early initiation of breastfeeding: Further analysis of three consecutive Nepal Demographic and Health Surveys Global health. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1069.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Senanayake P, O’Connor E, Ogbo FA. National and rural-urban prevalence and determinants of early initiation of breastfeeding in India. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):896.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Patel A, Banerjee A, Kaletwad A. Factors associated with prelacteal feeding and timely initiation of breastfeeding in hospital-delivered infants in India. J Hum Lact. 2013;29(4):572–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Soren SK, Sahu S, Kujur A, Dandpat A, Kashyap V, Kumari P, et al. Predictors of breastfeeding initiation among postnatal mothers at tertiary care center of a tribal dominant state in India: a regression analysis. Cureus. 2021;13(8).

  94. Agampodi SB, Agampodi TC, Piyaseeli UKD. Breastfeeding practices in a public health field practice area in Sri Lanka: A survival analysis. Int Breastfeed J. 2007;11:2.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Colodro-Conde L, Sánchez-Romera JF, Tornero-Gómez MJ, Pérez-Riquelme F, Polo-Tomás M, Ordoñana JR. Relationship between level of education and breastfeeding duration depends on social context: Breastfeeding trends over a 40-year period in Spain. J Hum Lact. 2011;27(3):272–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Logan C, Zittel T, Striebel S, Reister F, Brenner H, Rothenbacher Di, et al. Changing societal and lifestyle factors and breastfeeding patterns over time. Pediatrics. 2016;137(5):e20154473.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Vanderlinden K, Buffel V, van de Putte B, van de Velde S. Motherhood in europe: An examination of parental leave regulations and breastfeeding policy influences on breastfeeding initiation and duration. Soc Sci. 2020;9(12):1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Bagci Bosi AT, Eriksen KG, Sobko T, Wijnhoven TMA, Breda J. Breastfeeding practices and policies in WHO European Region Member States. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19(4):753–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Sarki M, Parlesak A, Robertson A. Comparison of national cross-sectional breast-feeding surveys by maternal education in Europe (2006–2016). Public Healt Nutri Cambridge University Press. 2019;22:848–61.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Zakarija-Grković I, Cattaneo A, Bettinelli ME, Pilato C, Vassallo C, Borg Buontempo M, et al. Are our babies off to a healthy start? The state of implementation of the Global strategy for infant and young child feeding in Europe. Int Breastfeed J. 2020;15(1):51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Walters D, Eberwein JD, Sullivan L, D’Alimonte M, Shekar M. An Investment Framework for Meeting the Global Nutrition Target for Breastfeeding. Washington DC; 2017. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/InvestmentFrameworkNutrition.

  102. Walters D, Horton S, Siregar AYM, Pitriyan P, Hajeebhoy N, Mathisen R, et al. The cost of not breastfeeding in Southeast Asia. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(8):1107–16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Quesada JA, Méndez I, Martín-Gil R. The economic benefits of increasing breastfeeding rates in Spain. Int Breastfeed J. 2020;15(1):34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Alive & Thrive. The cost of not breastfeeding [Internet]. 2022 (Cited 2022 Sep 13). Available from: https://www.aliveandthrive.org/en/the-cost-of-not-breastfeeding.

  105. Alive & Thrive. In Bangladesh, breastfeeding impacts families, communities, and the economy. 2022 (Cited 2022 Sep 13). Available from: https://www.aliveandthrive.org/en/country-stat/bangladesh.

  106. Jerin I, Akter M, Talukder K, Talukder MQEK, Rahman MA. Mobile phone support to sustain exclusive breastfeeding in the community after hospital delivery and counseling: A quasi-experimental study. Int Breastfeed J. 2020;15(1):14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Bridges N, Howell G, Schmied V. Exploring breastfeeding support on social media. Int Breastfeed J. 2018;13(1):22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Lund University, Sweden for providing access to Covidence tool for screening and data extraction. Authors also thank to Karolinska Institutet, Sweden for supporting the article processing charge (APC).

Funding

Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute. No fund was received for conducting this systematic review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Caritas Bangladesh, 2, Outer Circular Road, Shantibagh, Dhaka, 1217, Bangladesh

    Plabon Sarkar

  2. Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden

    M. A. Rifat, Sarah M. L. Pechtl & Tobias Lindström Battle

  3. Department of Food and Agroprocess Engineering, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh

    Progati Bakshi

  4. Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Imdadul Haque Talukdar

  5. Department of Clinical Sciences, Health Economics Unit, Lund University, 22381, Lund, Sweden

    Sanjib Saha

Authors
  1. Plabon Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. A. Rifat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Progati Bakshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Imdadul Haque Talukdar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sarah M. L. Pechtl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tobias Lindström Battle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sanjib Saha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Plabon Sarkar (PS): Conceptualization, Record searching, Data extraction, Quality assessment, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. M. A. Rifat (MAR): Conceptualization, Record searching, Methods, Data extraction, Quality assessment, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Progati Bakshi (PB): Conceptualization, Record searching, Data extraction, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. Imdadul Haque Talukdar (IHT): Quality assessment, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Sarah M. L. Pechtl (SMLP): Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Tobias Lindström Battle (TLB): Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Sanjib Saha (SS): Methods, Resources, Screening, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Rifat.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article has been updated to correct a mismatch between the PDF and webpublication.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarkar, P., Rifat, M.A., Bakshi, P. et al. How is parental education associated with infant and young child feeding in Bangladesh? a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health 23, 510 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12889-023-15173-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12889-023-15173-1

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us