Skip to main content

Multi-country cross-sectional study of colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms: protocol and methods for the Antibiotic Resistance in Communities and Hospitals (ARCH) studies

Abstract

Background

Antimicrobial resistance is a global health emergency. Persons colonized with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are at risk for developing subsequent multidrug-resistant infections, as colonization represents an important precursor to invasive infection. Despite reports documenting the worldwide dissemination of MDROs, fundamental questions remain regarding the burden of resistance, metrics to measure prevalence, and determinants of spread. We describe a multi-site colonization survey protocol that aims to quantify the population-based prevalence and associated risk factors for colonization with high-threat MDROs among community dwelling participants and patients admitted to hospitals within a defined population-catchment area.

Methods

Researchers in five countries (Bangladesh, Chile, Guatemala, Kenya, and India) will conduct a cross-sectional, population-based prevalence survey consisting of a risk factor questionnaire and collection of specimens to evaluate colonization with three high-threat MDROs: extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (ESCrE), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Healthy adults residing in a household within the sampling area will be enrolled in addition to eligible hospitalized adults. Colonizing isolates of these MDROs will be compared by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) to routinely collected invasive clinical isolates, where available, to determine potential pathogenicity. A colonizing MDRO isolate will be categorized as potentially pathogenic if the MLST pattern of the colonizing isolate matches the MLST pattern of an invasive clinical isolate. The outcomes of this study will be estimates of the population-based prevalence of colonization with ESCrE, CRE, and MRSA; determination of the proportion of colonizing ESCrE, CRE, and MRSA with pathogenic characteristics based on MLST; identification of factors independently associated with ESCrE, CRE, and MRSA colonization; and creation an archive of ESCrE, CRE, and MRSA isolates for future study.

Discussion

This is the first study to use a common protocol to evaluate population-based prevalence and risk factors associated with MDRO colonization among community-dwelling and hospitalized adults in multiple countries with diverse epidemiological conditions, including low- and middle-income settings. The results will be used to better describe the global epidemiology of MDROs and guide the development of mitigation strategies in both community and healthcare settings. These standardized baseline surveys can also inform future studies seeking to further characterize MDRO epidemiology globally.

Peer Review reports

Background

Antimicrobial resistance is a significant threat to global health security with the potential to stymie effective treatment and prevention of infections caused by a wide range of microorganisms [1]. Infections by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) such as extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (ESCrE, also known as third-generation cephalosporine-resistant Enterobacteriaceae), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can lead to disability or mortality, prolonged illness, and incur greater treatment costs [2,3,4,5] than those caused by more susceptible organisms. Addressing MDROs in low- and middle-income countries is particularly challenging, as health systems in these settings may not be prepared to effectively detect and prevent spread [6].

Originally described as infections of hospitalized patients, MDROs have since been documented in communities worldwide [7,8,9,10]. Studies of healthy travelers returning to the United States or Europe from countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia indicate that some travelers are colonized with ESCrE and CRE during their journeys even in the absence of exposure to healthcare facilities or to antibiotics, suggesting that there is considerable colonization pressure in communities in these regions [11,12,13,14]. First reported in hospitalized patients, incident MRSA infections have more recently been described among persons in the community across multiple countries [15,16,17,18,19]. High prevalence of MDROs in communities may facilitate importation of these bacteria into healthcare settings, where they may spread further and cause infections in hospitalized patients.

Colonization with MDROs such as ESCrE, CRE, and MRSA is asymptomatic but increases the risk of multidrug-resistant infections [20,21,22,23] and can result in the unrecognized spread of MDROs to non-colonized persons [24, 25]. Though both hospitalized patients and healthy individuals may be colonized by MDROs, it is unclear to what extent colonizing MDROs are similar to MDROs that cause invasive disease. Increasing availability of genetic sequencing data, such as multilocus sequence typing (MLST), permits comparison of pathogenic isolates to colonizing MDROs and assists in inferring potential invasiveness of colonizing MDRO isolates [26].

Effective surveillance of MDROs is essential to guide prevention programs. Contemporary efforts for tracking MDROs are focused on describing antimicrobial resistance of clinical isolates. In many countries this type of surveillance is aligned with the framework of the World Health Organization Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS), which focuses on reporting antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates from persons attending healthcare facilities [27]. However, focusing on MDROs isolated from clinical specimens alone may not fully describe the magnitude and proximate determinants of MDRO spread in surveillance populations due to the latency between MDRO colonization and subsequent infection. The limitations of current approaches for MDRO surveillance may hinder development of robust MDRO prevention and control strategies.

Population-based studies complement facility-based surveillance for a number of disease conditions including HIV, latent tuberculosis infection, and MRSA carriage, to yield more complete estimates of prevalence, improve understanding of associated risks, and track progress of prevention programs [28,29,30,31,32]. Methods used in population-based studies have the potential to be adapted to describe MDRO colonization. Consistent with this opportunity and the need to enhance understanding of MDRO spread, we herein describe a common protocol for a coordinated study in six sites to assess the population-based prevalence of and risk factors associated with colonization with three MDROs of public health importance: ESCrE, CRE, and MRSA. For each country, the objectives of our study are fourfold: 1) estimate the population-based prevalence of colonization with ESCrE, CRE, and MRSA, 2) determine the proportion of colonizing ESCrE, CRE, and MRSA with pathogenic characteristics, 3) identify factors (e.g., patient characteristics) independently associated with ESCrE, CRE, and MRSA colonization; and 4) create an archive of ESCrE, CRE, and MRSA isolates for future study.

Methods/design

Study sites

Geographic sites selected for participation must meet several criteria to participate in the study:

  1. 1.

    Must have a population of at least 10,000 individuals;

  2. 2.

    Must have, or be able to rapidly develop, a sampling frame for households;

  3. 3.

    Presence of at least one operational hospital that serves the population residing in the sampling frame (i.e., the sampling frame is within the catchment area of the hospital);

  4. 4.

    Must have access to a bacteriology laboratory, or network of laboratories, that can isolate bacteria from biological specimens, perform identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates, perform or refer bacterial isolates for multilocus sequence typing, and archive specimens and isolates for up to 5 years.

Six sites in five countries were selected: 1) Dhaka, Bangladesh; 2) Molina, Chile; 3) Quetzaltenango, Guatemala; 4) Asembo, Kenya; 5) Nairobi, Kenya; and 6) Chennai, India.

Study population

There are two target populations for the study: 1) healthy adults in households, and 2) hospitalized adults.

Eligibility criteria for enrollment of healthy adults in households are the following:

  • At least 18 years old;

  • Without fever, diarrhea, or cough at the time of interview and specimen collection;

  • Must have slept overnight in the household for at least 4 weeks.

Eligibility criteria for enrollment of hospitalized adults are the following:

  • At least 18 years old;

  • Without diarrhea or active gastrointestinal bleeding at the time of enrollment;

  • Documented severe neutropenia, defined as absolute neutrophil count < 500 (swabs may carry a risk of infection in the setting of skin and mucosal barrier breakdown).

Populations residing in sub-regions could be excluded if operations are not deemed feasible (e.g., regions of insecurity, military zones). Additional target populations (e.g., healthy children less than 5 years old) may be enrolled based on interest, operational capacity, and funding of in-country partners.

Sample size

The estimation for sample size of eligible healthy adults in the community is based on the following formula.

$$N=\frac{z^2r\left(1-r\right)f}{(dr)^2k}$$
(1)

N is the sample size;

z is the z-score for the desired confidence level of the estimate;r is an estimate of the proportion of MDRO colonization in the population;f is the design effect based on the sampling method;d is the relative precision of the estimate;k is the estimated response rate.

The sample size should account for the fact that sampling is done on a finite population in the geographic area of the study. Correcting the sample size N from [1] for a finite population is performed using the equation below:

$${N}_{FPC}=\frac{N}{1+\frac{N-1}{T}}$$
(2)

Here, NFPC is the corrected sample size based on N (the sample size from eq. 1) and T (the size of the target population in the study area).

Without prior knowledge of the extent of colonization in the population, a reasonable estimate to use for the proportion of adult individuals colonized with an MDRO is 0.2 [33,34,35,36]. Based on a 95% confidence interval, design effect of 2 to account for clustering, response rate of 75%, a relative precision of 20%, and assumption that the size of the target population is at least 10,000, a sample size of 1000 healthy adults will be needed. Among these 1000 healthy adults, 750 would be expected to complete study participation procedures and therefore represent the effective sample size.

The effective sample size should also be evaluated for sufficient power to identify associations between MDRO colonization and risk factors. For a logistic regression model consisting of 45 predictor variables, significance level of 0.05, and an estimate that the model explains 4% of the variance in MDRO colonization, an effective sample size of 750 would have a power of 0.82.

A similar approach will be used to generate a target sample size for the hospitalized population in the study area. The estimation for the number of inpatients to be sampled is based on the eq. 1, with application of the finite population correction described in eq. 2. For the hospitalized population, NFPC is the corrected sample size of adult inpatients based on N (the sample size of adult inpatients from eq. 1) and T (the total number of adult inpatients in the study area). Both N and T should be based on an average daily census over 1 month or longer.

For example, assuming a colonization proportion of 0.2 among hospitalized adults, a 95% confidence interval, design effect of 2, response rate of 75%, a relative precision of 20%, and assumption that the size of the hospitalized adult population is least 2000, a sample size of 678 hospitalized adults will be needed. A sample of 678 inpatients would have an effective enrollment of 509 inpatients. Additionally, for a logistic regression model consisting of 15 independent variables, significance level of 0.05, and an estimate that the model explains 4% of the variance in MDRO colonization, an effective sample of 509 adult inpatients would have a power of 0.85.

Sampling design

Sampling of healthy adults

At study sites where simple random sampling is logistically not feasible, cluster sampling will be the preferred method for the community study. Where necessary, multiple stages will be used.. At the first stage, the number of clusters allocated to sampling units will be based on probability proportional to size sampling, in which a cluster is any well-defined geographic area of similar population size such as enumeration areas or blocks. In the second stage, households will be mapped and listed in each of the selected clusters; a fixed number of households will then be selected by simple random sampling. Finally, one individual will be randomly selected for study participation among all eligible adults in the household.

Sampling for hospitalized adults

Stratification with proportional allocation is the preferred method for the hospital study. The total number of hospitalized persons to be sampled in a particular hospital will be based on the proportion of hospitalized persons in the study area (defined as the geographic area represented by the community sampling frame) represented by the hospital. Simple random sampling will be used to select and enroll hospitalized patients on a daily basis until the target sample size is reached. Oversampling may be considered for clinical areas of interest such as intensive care units or for certain categories of admitted patients such as those admitted for more than two calendar days.

Study implementation

Study duration

The study will run until the sample size is achieved and laboratory testing is completed. Total study duration will depend on the study team’s size, geographical distribution of the participants, and the capacity of the laboratory where the testing is performed. We anticipate the estimated time needed to complete the study will range from 12 -- 24 months.

Enrollment of healthy adults in communities

Study staff will approach households selected from the sampling frame and will ask if the head-of-household (or household representative) is willing to participate in the study. If so, then study staff will request informed consent from the head-of-household or household representative to collect information about the household. Following documented written informed consent by the head-of-household, study staff will administer a questionnaire to capture household characteristics.

Next, from a list of all adult household members, study staff will randomly select one individual who meets eligibility criteria for further participation. Informed consent will be requested from the selected individual; if the individual declines or does not meet eligibility criteria, then an alternate will be randomly selected. After informed consent has been obtained, study staff will then administer a questionnaire to capture demographic and exposure history, including recent healthcare utilization, prior antibiotic use, occupational exposures, animal contact, access to safe water and sanitation facilities, and recent food sources.

Enrollment of hospitalized adults

Study staff will approach patients selected from the hospitals in the study area. Informed consent will be requested from hospital individuals who meet eligibility criteria. An adult caretaker must be present to provide informed consent for unconscious or sedated patients.

After informed consent has been obtained, study staff will collect data from medical records or patient interview on a standardized instrument. These data include demographic characteristics and relevant exposure history, including duration of hospitalization prior to enrollment, ward type and bed number on the day of the study, history of procedures, utilization of invasive medical devices, systemic antibiotic exposures, and results of microbiological tests. All information will be recorded by the study staff.

Collection of stool specimens

Enrolled participants will be asked to provide a stool specimen. At the household-level, study staff will give participants a stool collection kit to collect a fresh stool specimen as well as items to keep stool cold while awaiting pick up by study staff. Hospitalized patients will be given a stool collection kit or bed pan if bedridden. Study staff will also provide instructions for minimizing the risk of contamination by urine, toilet surfaces, and toilet water. Study staff will deliver stool specimens to the laboratory within 12 h of collection to the study laboratory.

In lieu of stools samples, certain enrolled participants may opt to have a rectal swab taken by trained study staff. Rectal swabs will be done via commercial kit using elution swabs (e.g. Copan Diagnostics Eswabs™) and will be obtained by inserting a sterile swab into the rectum, rotating then removing and placing into Liquid Amies transport media and kept at 4 °C until plating.

Collection of nasal swabs

At select sites detecting MRSA colonization, study staff will collect a single nasal swab (e.g., Copan Diagnostics Eswabs™) from enrolled participants by inserting a sterile swab into the naris, rotating against the anterior nasal mucosa, removing the swab, and then repeating with the other naris. After collection, swabs will be placed into a Liquid Amies transport media and kept at 4 °C until plating. Samples will be brought to the laboratory within 24 h of collection.

Laboratory procedures

Standard operating procedures (SOP) were developed for the transport and processing of study specimens and then adapted at each study site for use. On arrival at the study laboratory, all specimens will be reviewed for labeling, quantity of biological material, and length of time from specimen collection, sample integrity, and transport and storage under the correct conditions. Specimens that do not meet the criteria for acceptance (e.g., delayed transport time, leaking on arrival to lab, missing or incorrect label) will be rejected and documented accordingly.

Accepted specimens will be directly inoculated on separate culture media selective for each MDRO. For most sites this will be a commercially available brand of chromogenic agar selective for ESCrE, CRE, and MRSA (e.g., CHROMagar™, CHROMID™); alternatives may include MacConkey agar with appropriate antibiotics for selection of these MDROs of interest. Stool specimens/rectal swabs will be inoculated on culture media selective for ESCrE and CRE. Nasal swab specimens will be inoculated on culture media selective for MRSA. Plates will be incubated in standard conditions for 18–24 h. If growth is present, up to three unique morphotypes from each plate with growth will be selected for archiving; these isolates will also undergo bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (e.g., via bioMerieux Vitek® 2), as well as PCR-based or whole genome MLST. Sites with technical expertise, supplies, and funding may inoculate specimens on additional selective media to detect colonization with other MDROs, such as colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

During the study period, Enterobacteriaceae (e.g., E. coli, K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae) and S. aureus isolates from blood specimens at participating hospitals will be referred for MLST to generate a library of sequence types of locally detected infectious isolates in the study region.

Pilot and monitoring

Before the formal study begins, study staff will undergo training on the protocol, standard operating procedures, and human subject’s protections related to the study. Worker safety issues will be addressed for collection, transport, analysis, handling, storage and disposal of biological specimens in accordance with local regulations.

A pilot involving at least 10 individuals from the community and 10 hospitalized patients will be performed at each site to identify and address any issues related to enrollment, interviews, specimen collection, specimen transport, and specimen analysis. Any issues identified during the pilot period will be addressed before initiating the formal study.

Monitoring will be performed on an ongoing basis to assess patient recruitment and to assess the quality and timeliness of collected study data. On-site monitoring will be performed by designated staff at least once every 2 weeks during the study period. The site supervisor will confirm that 1) the rights and well-being of human subjects are protected; 2) the consent process is followed per protocol; 3) the consent forms are appropriately completed; 4) the reported study data are accurate and complete; and 5) the participant identity is secured separately from the data; 6) the study conducted is in adherence with the currently approved protocol.

Laboratory quality control will be performed at the lab conducting the microbiology testing throughout the course of the study, with corrections to isolation, identification, and/or antimicrobial resistance detection processes if warranted. Manufacturer-recommended quality control strains will be plated alongside specimens obtained during the study to ensure quality of results. Logs for equipment used during the study will be kept to document correct operations of all laboratory procedures.

Every 2 weeks during the study, microbiology monitors will inspect all records kept by the laboratories for the study (e.g., quality control logs, specimen results), will ask questions regarding relevant laboratory processes and adherence to study SOPs, will observe the operations of the site, will review the results of testing of simulated specimens, and will debrief the team with findings and any needed actions. The microbiology monitors will assist laboratory staff to correct any deficiencies identified, including supporting the provision of necessary supplies and resources for the duration of the study. Specimens tested during periods of deficiency will be considered for disposal with a compensatory increase in enrollment of study participants.

During the study period, the laboratories will follow their routine SOPs for equipment maintenance and calibration. They will also adhere to their standard biosafety and biosecurity procedures applicable to isolation, identification and susceptibility testing of antimicrobial-resistant organisms.

Data management

Within 1 week of enrollment, documents related to study participants will be completed, checked for quality, scanned, and securely archived. Physical copies of all forms will remain at the field site until the end of the survey. Documents with identifying data will be destroyed at the end of the study. Where feasible, electronic instruments (e.g., tablet computers) will be used for data entry.

In-country staff will transcribe paper-based questionnaire data and laboratory results into a study database; transcribed records will be de-identified. Study staff will use a standard reporting template to summarize participant enrollment, specimen collection and processing, and laboratory results for regular review by technical monitors. Electronic data will be stored on password-protected computers accessible only by the study team.

Phenotypic definitions

  1. 1.

    ESCrE colonization is defined as isolation of Enterobacteriaceae non-susceptible to ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, or cefotaxime in a stool specimen collected from a study participant.

  2. 2.

    CRE colonization is defined as isolation of Enterobacteriaceae with acquired resistance to ertapenem, meropenem, doripenem, or imipenem in a stool specimen collected from a study participant.

  3. 3.

    MRSA colonization is defined as isolation of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to oxacillin or cefoxitin in a nasal swab specimen collected from a study participant.

Resistance and non-susceptibility will be interpreted based on breakpoints established by Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute in the M100 | Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing document.

Analysis plan

Descriptive analysis will be performed to describe the demographic characteristics of study participants and prevalence of risk factors. Risk factors associated with colonization will be assessed by using mixed-effects multivariate logistic regression models. Colonization will be represented as a binary variable indicating either presence or absence of MDRO. Risk factors will be constructed as continuous or categorical variables in accordance with the type of data captured. Additional models may be constructed to examine associations between risk factors and additional outcomes of interest such as colonization with specific MDRO species (e.g., carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli).

Estimates of prevalence of MDRO colonization will be presented with 95% confidence intervals and will be adjusted for participation completion rates and sampling method; missing value imputation and sensitivity analysis will be performed where necessary.

At each study site, a colonizing isolate will be categorized as potentially pathogenic if the MLST pattern of the colonizing isolate matches the MLST pattern of a locally detected invasive isolate (defined as isolates growing from sterile sites such as blood only) obtained from participating hospitals or from public libraries of MLST patterns (e.g., PubMLST). For example, a colonizing isolate of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae will be designated as potentially pathogenic if its MLST pattern is present in the library of MLSTs of K. pneumoniae isolates from blood specimens.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and the public were not involved in the design of the study and will not be involved in study implementation.

Ethics and dissemination

The protocol and subsequent amendments must receive ethical approval by appropriate national and local governments, academic bodies, and hospital administrators. The approval process must adhere to all local customs, standards, and regulations. All documents that are presented in a language other than English must be accompanied by a certificate from an independent observer confirming that the translated document is a locally appropriate translation of the English documents.

The results from the project will be summarized to in-country government bodies and health officials. Findings from the study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and will also be presented at scientific conferences.

Discussion

This protocol summarizes the rationale and approach of a study to determine the population-based prevalence of and associated risk factors for colonization with MDROs in multiple countries. This approach is complementary to conventional approaches of tracking antimicrobial resistance, which typically rely on characterization of clinical isolates from patient receiving healthcare. However, given the challenges of conducting surveillance with minimal bias (e.g., variable culturing practices and procedures), our study is positioned to generate critical data of the magnitude and proximate drivers of MDRO spread in diverse epidemiological settings. This study will also be valuable in generating data from a variety of low- and middle-income settings as often these areas have high rates of MDROs but generate little surveillance data to guide prevention and control efforts.

The strengths of the study include the utilization of existing platforms for population-based studies, simplified diagnostic procedures to detect MDRO colonization, enrollment of individuals in communities and hospitals from the same geographic setting, and implementation in multiple sites with diverse epidemiological characteristics to enhance understanding of MDRO spread. Categorization of colonizing isolates as potentially pathogenic based on MLST pattern will aid in estimating the human health consequence of MDRO colonization. Additionally, the archive of MDROs will provide opportunities for further characterization and analysis. In the future, sites that have generated baseline data can serve as a foundation for future studies looking at genomic markers of resistance, microbiome analyses and other work to better understand the global epidemiology of MDROs.

Given the observational study design this study will assess associations, not causal relationships between exposure and MDRO colonization. Inferences regarding the human health consequence of MDRO colonization are based on comparison of MLST of colonizing and infectious isolates. However, some MDROs with MLST not typically associated with pathogenic bacteria could cause infections; conversely, not all MDROs with an MLST similar to pathogenic bacteria will cause infections given host and environmental factors.

In summary, measuring the population-based prevalence of and risk factors associated with MDRO colonization is necessary to understand the magnitude of MDRO spread, prioritize areas for coordinated mitigation efforts, and potentially develop a metric to monitor success of prevention programs without relying on clinical infection data which are often biased towards capturing sicker patients who may have more resistant bacteria. The results from our study will add important information to existing surveillance approaches to track antimicrobial resistance and will provide insights on strategies to combat this global threat.

CDC disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

CRE:

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

ESCrE:

Extended spectrum cephalosporin resistant Enterobacteriaceae

MDRO:

Multi-drug resistant organism

MLST:

Multi-locus sequence typing

MRSA:

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus

SOP:

Standardized operating procedure

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: WHO; 2015.

  2. 2.

    Schwaber MJ, Carmeli Y. Mortality and delay in effective therapy associated with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60(5):913–20. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/jac/dkm318.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cosgrove SE, Sakoulas G, Perencevich EN, Schwaber MJ, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y. Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(1):53–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1086/345476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Borer A, Saidel-Odes L, Riesenberg K, Eskira S, Peled N, Nativ R, et al. Attributable mortality rate for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(10):972–6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1086/605922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Friedman ND, Temkin E, Carmeli Y. The negative impact of antibiotic resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(5):416–22. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.cmi.2015.12.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    O'Neill J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. London: Government of the United Kingdom; 2016.

  7. 7.

    Kelly AM, Mathema B, Larson EL. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the community: a scoping review. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;50(2):127–34. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.03.012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Larson E. Community factors in the development of antibiotic resistance. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28(1):435–47. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Pitout JD, Nordmann P, Laupland KB, Poirel L. Emergence of Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) in the community. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56(1):52–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/jac/dki166.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pitout JD, Laupland KB. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8(3):159–66. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70041-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Arcilla MS, van Hattem JM, Haverkate MR, Bootsma MCJ, van Genderen PJJ, Goorhuis A, et al. Import and spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae by international travellers (COMBAT study): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):78–85. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30319-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lübbert C, Straube L, Stein C, Makarewicz O, Schubert S, Mössner J, et al. Colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in international travelers returning to Germany. Int J Med Microbiol. 2015;305(1):148–56. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ostholm-Balkhed A, Tärnberg M, Nilsson M, Nilsson LE, Hanberger H, Hällgren A, et al. Travel-associated faecal colonization with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: incidence and risk factors. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(9):2144–53. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/jac/dkt167.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tängdén T, Cars O, Melhus A, Löwdin E. Foreign travel is a major risk factor for colonization with Escherichia coli producing CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a prospective study with Swedish volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(9):3564–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/AAC.00220-10.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Coombs GW, Nimmo GR, Pearson JC, Christiansen KJ, Bell JM, Collignon PJ, et al. Prevalence of MRSA strains among Staphylococcus aureus isolated from outpatients, 2006. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2009;33(1):10–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ghebremedhin B, Olugbosi MO, Raji AM, Layer F, Bakare RA, König B, et al. Emergence of a community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain with a unique resistance profile in Southwest Nigeria. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(9):2975–80. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/JCM.00648-09.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Loughrey A, Millar BC, Goldsmith CE, Rooney PJ, Moore JE. Emergence of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) in Northern Ireland. Ulster Med J. 2007;76(2):68–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, et al. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(7):666–74. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1056/NEJMoa055356.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Young LM, Price CS. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus emerging as an important cause of necrotizing fasciitis. Surg Infect. 2008;9(4):469–74. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1089/sur.2007.052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Stevens AM, Hennessy T, Baggett HC, Bruden D, Parks D, Klejka J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage and risk factors for skin infections, southwestern Alaska. USA Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(5):797–803. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3201/eid1605.091851.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Davis KA, Stewart JJ, Crouch HK, Florez CE, Hospenthal DR. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization at hospital admission and its effect on subsequent MRSA infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(6):776–82. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1086/422997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dickstein Y, Edelman R, Dror T, Hussein K, Bar-Lavie Y, Paul M. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae colonization and infection in critically ill patients: a retrospective matched cohort comparison with non-carriers. J Hosp Infect. 2016;94(1):54–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jhin.2016.05.018.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tischendorf J, de Avila RA, Safdar N. Risk of infection following colonization with carbapenem-resistant Enterobactericeae: a systematic review. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44(5):539–43. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.12.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mollema FP, Richardus JH, Behrendt M, Vaessen N, Lodder W, Hendriks W, et al. Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to household contacts. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(1):202–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/JCM.01499-09.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hilty M, Betsch BY, Bögli-Stuber K, Heiniger N, Stadler M, Küffer M, et al. Transmission dynamics of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the tertiary care hospital and the household setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(7):967–75. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/cid/cis581.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Charlebois ED, Bangsberg DR, Moss NJ, Moore MR, Moss AR, Chambers HF, et al. Population-based community prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the urban poor of San Francisco. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(4):425–33. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1086/338069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tornimbene B, Eremin S, Escher M, Griskeviciene J, Manglani S, Pessoa-Silva CL. WHO global antimicrobial resistance surveillance system early implementation 2016-17. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(3):241–2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30060-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bennett DE, Courval JM, Onorato I, Agerton T, Gibson JD, Lambert L, et al. Prevalence of tuberculosis infection in the United States population: the national health and nutrition examination survey, 1999-2000. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(3):348–55. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1164/rccm.200701-057OC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gorwitz RJ, Kruszon-Moran D, McAllister SK, McQuillan G, McDougal LK, Fosheim GE, et al. Changes in the prevalence of nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2001-2004. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(9):1226–34. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1086/533494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Graham PL, Lin SX, Larson EL. A U.S. population-based survey of Staphylococcus aureus colonization. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(5):318–25. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.7326/0003-4819-144-5-200603070-00006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Fylkesnes K, Ndhlovu Z, Kasumba K, Mubanga Musonda R, Sichone M. Studying dynamics of the HIV epidemic: population-based data compared with sentinel surveillance in Zambia. AIDS. 1998;12(10):1227–34. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/00002030-199810000-00015.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    García-Calleja JM, Gouws E, Ghys PD. National population based HIV prevalence surveys in sub-Saharan Africa: results and implications for HIV and AIDS estimates. Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82(Suppl 3):iii64–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bulabula ANH, Dramowski A, Mehtar S. Maternal colonization or infection with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;64:58–66. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ijid.2017.08.015.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Karanika S, Karantanos T, Arvanitis M, Grigoras C, Mylonakis E. Fecal colonization with extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and risk factors among healthy individuals: a systematic review and Metaanalysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(3):310–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/cid/ciw283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lewis JM, Lester R, Garner P, Feasey NA. Gut mucosal colonisation with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;4:160. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15514.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wong JW, Ip M, Tang A, Wei VW, Wong SY, Riley S, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of community-associated methicillin-resistant. Clin Epidemiol. 2018;10:1489–501. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2147/CLEP.S160595.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) via Global Health Security Agenda cooperative agreements (GH001859, GH001207, GH002143, and GH002241) and a Broad Agency Announcement contract (#75D301-18C-02925). Authors with a CDC affiliation were employed by U.S. CDC at the time when this study was conceived, and the protocol was written. These CDC-employed authors contributed to the study as detailed below in Authors’ contributions. Apart from these CDC-employed author contributions, the funder had no other role in the study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AS and BP conceptualized the study. AS, U-OL, PP, JDL, DRC, SO, KL, RA, JMM, JV, FC, SMM, JV, AE-B, BR, CC-R, GK, TB, NG, BP, and RMS were involved in the design of the study. AS and RMS drafted the manuscript. All authors have reviewed, commented on and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel M. Smith.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approvals and consent to participate

Participants in this study will undergo written informed consent prior to enrollment. This study was approved by the following ethical review boards:

  • Bangladesh: icddr,b Research Review Committee and Ethical Review Committee (#PR-18060)

  • Chile: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile Comite etico cientifico CEC-MEDUC (# 181105003) and Comite Etico de la Investigacion Facultad de Medicina Clinica Alemana- Universidad del Desarrollo (#2019–003)

  • Guatemala: Universidad del Valle de Guatemala Research Ethics Committee (#202–10-2019)

  • Kenya: Kenyatta National Hospital-University of Nairobi Ethics & Research Committee (KNH-ERC/A/228 and KNH/ERC/R/85)

  • India: National Institute of Epidemiology Institutional Human Ethics Committee (NIE/IHEC/201904–02)

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None of the authors has a commercial or other financial interest associated with the information presented in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, A., Luvsansharav, UO., Paul, P. et al. Multi-country cross-sectional study of colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms: protocol and methods for the Antibiotic Resistance in Communities and Hospitals (ARCH) studies. BMC Public Health 21, 1412 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12889-021-11451-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • MDRO
  • Antimicrobial resistance
  • Global health security