Skip to main content

Table 3 Weighted prevalence rates (%) of tobacco use, betel quid chewing and dual use by socio-demographic factors among men and women in Myanmar, 2015–16

From: Tobacco use and betel quid chewing among adults in Myanmar- estimates and social determinants from demographic and health survey, 2015–16

 

MEN

WOMEN

Tobacco use

Betel quid

Non-user

tobacco or betel quid

Dual user

Tobacco use

Betel quid

Non-user

tobacco or betel quid

Dual user

Overall

40.9

58.9

24.6

50.4

25.0

3.7

18.2

80.1

17.9

2.04

Age groups

 15–20

24.4

41.4

50.3

33.6

16.1

0.5

5.7

93.9

5.9

0.2

 21–30

42.8

64.2

20.7

51.6

27.7

1.7

13.0

86.2

13.0

0.9

 31–40

44.7

62.8

19.6

53.3

27.1

4.3

23.1

75.1

22.3

2.6

 41–49

47.2

61.8

15.1

60.8

24.1

8.2

27.6

68.7

27.2

4.2

Education×

 No education

50.8

50.8

21.8

53.2

25.1

9.8

28.1

66.6

28.8

4.6

 Primary

41.5

66.3

17.1

55.7

27.2

4.9

24.7

73.1

23.9

3.0

 Secondary

37.6

56.4

29.5

46.1

24.3

1.0

11.2

88.4

10.9

0.6

 Higher

30.7

51.6

38.5

45.9

18.2

0.4

4.6

95.0

5.0

Marital status

 Never married

31.5

50.0

37.7

42.3

20.0

0.9

7.3

92.0

7.5

0.4

 Currently married

43.6

64.0

17.7

55.3

27.0

4.8

22.8

74.8

22.4

2.7

 Divorced/Separated/Widowed

69.5

55.5

16.0

40.9

43.0

6.2

30.9

67.0

28.7

4.2

Wealth Index

 Poorest

45.7

64.8

16.8

54.0

29.1

10.2

35.0

60.6

33.6

5.8

 Poorer

41.0

62.1

21.3

51.7

26.9

5.0

22.8

75.0

22.3

2.7

 Middle

39.3

59.5

24.4

51.3

24.2

2.9

16.2

82.3

16.3

1.4

 Richer

38.0

56.1

27.9

49.1

23.0

1.5

12.4

86.7

12.6

0.7

 Richest

36.9

52.9

31.7

46.1

22.0

0.6

8.2

91.5

8.2

0.3

Type of residence

 Rural

39.4

59.7

23.7

51.9

24.4

46.8

20.4

77.4

19.8

2.7

 Urban

41.7

57.1

27.0

46.6

26.4

1.1

12.8

86.4

13.2

0.4

Occupation

 Unemployed/domestic work

24.4

29.8

59.8

25.6

14.5

3.5

18.9

79.7

17.8

2.3

 Professional/service/sales

39.3

57.3

27.0

48.9

24.1

2.1

16.9

82.0

16.7

1.3

 Agricultural work

38.6

60.3

23.6

50.8

25.6

4.6

22.9

74.6

23.2

0.22

 Manual worker

43.0

62.3

20.0

53.9

26.1

4.5

16.6

81.1

16.5

2.4

  1. Chi square test was used to test the statistical significance of differences in tobacco use, betel quid chewing and dual use by sociodemographic factors all factors were statistically significant at p < 0.001 or p < 0.01 (betel quid by type of residence) except for tobacco use type of residence (p > 0.05)