| Continuous variable (ten additional convenience stores) | Categorical variablea (more convenience stores vs less convenience stores) |
---|
ORb | 95% CI | P value | ORc | 95% CI | P value |
---|
Model 1 | 1.06 | (0.97, 1.15) | 0.178 | 1.17 | (0.89, 1.54) | 0.259 |
Model 2 | 1.06 | (0.97, 1.15) | 0.194 | 1.16 | (0.88, 1.54) | 0.291 |
Model 3 | 1.09 | (1.01, 1.18) | 0.030 | 1.34 | (1.02, 1.76) | 0.035 |
Model 4 | 1.10 | (1.01, 1.19) | 0.029 | 1.37 | (1.04, 1.81) | 0.026 |
Model 5 | 1.13 | (1.03, 1.24) | 0.011 | 1.49 | (1.09, 2.03) | 0.013 |
- aCategorical variable was divided by 24: the median number of convenience stores
- bOR for continuous variable was the odds ratio of ten additional convenience stores
- cOR for categorical variable was more than or equal to the median number of 24 versus less than 24 (reference)
- Model 1: null model
- Model 2: adjusted for districts
- Model 3: Model 2 + father’s obesity, mother’s obesity, family type, father’s education, and mother’s education
- Model 4: Model 3 + age, gender
- Model 5: Model 4 + diet score, meeting the recommendation of MVPA, and meeting the recommendation of screen time