Skip to main content

Table 4 Association between intervention and well-being

From: Disabled People’s Organisations increase access to services and improve well-being: evidence from a cluster randomized trial in North India

WELL-BEING

n

Model 1a

Model 2b

Intervention Odds Ratio (95% CI)

p-value

Intervention Odds Ratio (95% CI)

p-value

Confident

370

1.12 (0.5 to 2.6)

0.78

1.64 (0.9 to 2.98)

0.15

Respected by community

402

1.36 (0.58 to 3.22)

0.48

1.34 (0.6 to 3.0)

0.47

Opinion

399

1.62 (0.85 to 3.1)

0.14

1.94 (1.16 to 3.24)

0.01

Able to make friends

341

1.3 (0.45 to 3.79)

0.63

1.63 (1 to 2.65)

0.05

Living condition

433

2.28 (0.96 to 5.41)

0.06

2.01 (0.89 to 4.62)

0.09

Help Others

380

0.83 (0.24 to 2.86)

0.76

1.28 (0.7 to 2.33)

0.42

  1. aExplanatory factors: group and baseline; adjusted for clusters (ADPs)
  2. bExplanatory factors: group, baseline and NGO; adjusted for clusters (ADPs) Chamba (NGO) was the reference group in the GEE model 2 with implementing NGO added as a covariate