Skip to main content

Table 3 Changes in Well-being indicators in the control and intervention groups

From: Disabled People’s Organisations increase access to services and improve well-being: evidence from a cluster randomized trial in North India

Well-being

% of met needs at baselinea (n; 95% CI)

% of met need at endlinea (n; 95% CI)

Intervention

Control

Intervention

Control

Confident

46% (99, 35.7 to 56.7%)

48.5% (72, 33.5 to 63.8%)

59.9% (130, 46.6 to 71.8%)

45.1% (77, 21.8 to 70.7%)

Respected by community

81.4% (191, 66.2 to 90.7%)

75.3% (124, 64.6 to 83.5%)

84.3% (211, 73.5 to 91.2%)

82.8% (153, 69.1 to 91.1%)

Opinion

67% (154, 60 to 73.4%)

63.1% (104, 55.9 to 69.7%)

75.6% (179, 66.4 to 82.9%)

62.1% (117, 52.5 to 70.9%)

Able to make friends

23.9% (55, 11.4 to 43.5%)

18.2% (37, 8 to 36.3%)

37.8% (89, 20.3 to 59.1%)

32.4% (55, 15.7 to 55.4%)

Living condition

75.6% (181, 54.2 to 89%)

69% (130, 49.3 to 83.6%)

91.1% (237, 81.4 to 96%)

82.3% (163, 68.2 to 91%)

Help Others

20.1% (41, 7.4 to 44.1%)

11.1% (25, 5.5 to 21.4%)

34.3% (76, 16.4 to 58.2%)

32.4% (52, 10.9 to 65.2%)

  1. aPercentages were weighted by sampling weights i.e. total sample / number of sample in the cluster