Skip to main content

Table 3 Odds-ratios for a fair/poor self-rated health status (SRHS) in relation to aircraft noise exposure in highly annoyed/sensitive to noise men and women compared to those who are not

From: Self-rated health status in relation to aircraft noise exposure, noise annoyance or noise sensitivity: the results of a cross-sectional study in France

 

M6 model

M7 model

Not highly annoyed people

Highly annoyed people

p (interaction) a

People not highly sensitive to noise

People highly sensitive to noise

p(interaction) b

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

WOMEN

LAeq. 24ha

0.81

(0.51–1.29)

1.40

(0.38–5.24)

0.25

1.00

(0.58–1.71)

0.89

(0.46–1.70)

0.51

Ldena

0.88

(0.58–1.33)

1.36

(0.38–4.89)

0.31

1.03

(0.63–1.69)

0.96

(0.53–1.71)

0.53

MEN

LAeq. 24ha

1.53

(0.86–2.73)

1.54

(0.47–4.99)

0.74

1.24

(0.69–2.21)

3.72

(1.28–10.8)

0.04

Ldena

1.43

(0.85–2.39)

1.35

(0.45–4.03)

0.76

1.19

(0.71–2.00)

3.26

(1.19–8.88)

0.05

  1. M6 and M7 models included aircraft noise levels, age, country of birth, smoking, the number of people in the dwelling, and monthly household income
  2. a p-value for the interaction between aircraft noise levels and aircraft noise annoyance
  3. b p-value for the interaction between aircraft noise levels and noise sensitivity
  4. Bold values are statistically significant (p< 0.05)