Skip to main content

Table 2 Odds-ratios for a fair/poor self-rated health status (SRHS) in relation to aircraft noise exposure, aircraft noise annoyance and noise sensitivity

From: Self-rated health status in relation to aircraft noise exposure, noise annoyance or noise sensitivity: the results of a cross-sectional study in France

 

WOMEN

MEN

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

M0 model

LAeq. 24ha

1.02

(0.69–1.50)

1.67

(1.06–2.62)

Ldena

1.06

(0.74–1.51)

1.52

(1.01–2.29)

Aircraft noise annoyanceb

1.25

(0.76–2.08)

1.88

(1.09–3.26)

Noise sensitivityc

1.61

(1.06–2.44)

1.35

(0.80–2.27)

M1 model

LAeq. 24ha

0.97

(0.64–1.45)

1.69

(1.05–2.74)

Ldena

1.01

(0.69–1.45)

1.55

(1.01–2.39)

M2 model

LAeq. 24ha

0.95

(0.62–1.44)

1.56

(0.95–2.56)

Aircraft noise annoyanceb

1.11

(0.64–1.91)

1.60

(0.87–2.94)

Ldena

0.99

(0.67–1.45)

1.44

(0.92–2.24)

Aircraft noise annoyanceb

1.09

(0.63–1.88)

1.61

(0.87–2.97)

M3 model

LAeq. 24ha

0.97

(0.65–1.46)

1.75

(1.08–2.85)

Noise sensitivityc

1.74

(1.12–2.68)

1.73

(0.97–3.11)

Ldena

1.01

(0.69–1.46)

1.62

(1.04–2.52)

Noise sensitivityc

1.73

(1.12–2.68)

1.73

(0.97–3.11)

M4 model

Aircraft noise annoyanceb

1.08

(0.64–1.83)

1.81

(1.00–3.27)

M5 model

Noise sensitivityc

1.74

(1.12–2.68)

1.68

(0.94–3.00)

  1. a Per 10 dB(A) increase
  2. b Odds ratio for highly annoyed people compared to those who were not highly annoyed
  3. c Odds ratio for people highly sensitive to noise compared to those who were not highly sensitive to noise
  4. M0 model included in turn noise levels, aircraft noise annoyance and noise sensitivity
  5. M1 model included noise levels, age, country of birth, smoking, number of people in the dwelling, monthly household income
  6. M2 model included aircraft noise annoyance, noise levels, age, country of birth, smoking, number of people in the dwelling, monthly household income
  7. M3 model included noise sensitivity, noise levels, age, country of birth, smoking, number of people in the dwelling, monthly household income
  8. M4 model included aircraft noise annoyance, age, country of birth, smoking, number of people in the dwelling, monthly household income
  9. M5 model included noise sensitivity, age, country of birth, smoking, number of people in the dwelling, monthly household income
  10. Bold values are statistically significant (p<0.05)