Skip to main content

Table 1 Average university student lipid parameters by race, financial need, gender, and athletic participation, 2003–15*,**

From: Screening and socioeconomic associations of dyslipidemia in young adults

 

N = 4423

TCa

TG

HDL-Ca

VLDL-C

LDL-C

Race

 Caucasian

3697

160.2 (158.1, 162.2)

89.2 (86.4, 92.0)

55.7 (54.8, 56.5)

17.7 (17.1, 18.2)

86.4 (84.7, 88.1)

 African-American

227

161.2 (157.1, 165.3)

64.9 (59.3, 70.5)

59.4 (57.7, 61.1)

12.7 (11.6, 13.8)

88.6 (85.3, 92.0)

 Asian

169

164.8 (160.0, 169.6)

91.5 (84.9, 98.1)

57.7 (55.8, 59.7)

18.1 (16.8, 19.5)

88.6 (84.6, 92.6)

 Hispanic

139

161.8 (156.6, 166.9)

89.4 (82.3, 96.5)

56.6 (54.5, 58.7)

17.7 (16.3, 19.1)

87.1 (82.9, 91.4)

 Others

191

160.9 (156.5, 165.4)

87.5 (81.4, 93.6)

55.8 (54.0, 57.6)

17.3 (16.0, 18.5)

87.4 (83.7, 91.1)

Financial Need Status b

 High need (~$86 k)

1387

159.7 (157.2, 162.2)

82.2 (78.7, 85.6)

56.5 (55.5, 57.5)

16.3 (15.6, 17.0)

86.4 (84.3, 88.4)

 Medium need (~$169 k)

234

165.5 (161.2, 169.8)

87.7 (81.8, 93.6)

57.7 (56.0, 59.5)

17.3 (16.1, 18.5)

90.1 (86.5, 93.7)

 Low need (~$182 k)

2802

160.1 (157.8, 162.4)

83.7 (80.5, 86.8)

56.8 (55.9, 57.8)

16.5 (15.9, 17.1)

86.4 (84.5, 88.3)

Gender

 Female

2605

167.6 (165.0, 170.2)

84.2 (80.6, 87.7)

61.8 (60.7, 62.8)

16.6 (15.9, 17.4)

88.8 (86.6, 90.9)

 Male

1818

155.9 (153.3, 158.6)

84.8 (81.2, 88.5)

52.3 (51.2, 53.4)

16.7 (16.0, 17.5)

86.5 (84.3, 88.7)

Athletic Participation

 Yes

331

161.2 (157.6, 164.8)

82.8 (77.8, 87.8)

57.9 (56.5, 59.4)

16.3 (15.3, 17.3)

86.5 (83.4, 89.5)

 No

4092

162.4 (160.3, 164.4)

86.2 (83.4, 89.1)

56.1 (55.3, 57.0)

17.1 (16.4, 17.6)

88.8 (87.1, 90.5)

  1. TC Total Cholesterol, TG Triglyceride, HDL-C High-Density Lipoprotein, VLDL-C Very Low-Density Lipoprotein, LDL-C Low-Density Lipoprotein. All data measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Data are presented as means followed by 95% confidence interval in parentheses
  2. *General Linear model p-values. Adjustment is made for race, gender, financial need status, athletic participation and Age. P-Values less than 0.05 are considered significant and underlined and bolded
  3. **Post-hoc multiple pair-wise comparison using Tukey’s adjustment
  4. aNo significant interaction between Race, Gender and Athletic participation b Not all students had FAFSAs (Free Application for Federal Student Aid)