Study | Findings |
---|---|
Artac et al., 2013 [20] | Year 1 analyses (high-risk patients only) IMD Tertile 3 vs. 1: AOR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.69–1.01, p > .050 IMD Tertile 2 vs. 1: AOR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.79–1.13, p > .050 Year 2 analyses (all eligible patients) IMD Tertile 3 vs. 1: AOR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.73–0.87, p < .010 IMD Tertile 2 vs. 1: AOR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.78–0.90, p < .010 |
Attwood et al., 2016 [19] | Unadjusted analyses IMD Quintile 2 vs. 5: OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.39–3.38, p < .010 IMD Quintile 1 vs. 5: OR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.84–4.58, p < .010 Adjusted analyses IMD Quintile 2 vs. 5: AOR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.18–0.67, p < .050 IMD Quintile 1 vs. 5: AOR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.20–0.88, p < .050 |
Cochrane et al., 2013 [23] | Lowest attendance in tertile 3 (attendance rate = 42.6%, p < .050) Highest attendance in tertile 1 (attendance rate = 48.4%, p < .050 Deprivation was no longer significant when analyses were adjusted for gender, age, risk category and practice size AOR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.96–1.30 |
Coghill et al., 2018 [22] | Non-significant effect of deprivation on uptake (p = .053) |
Cook et al., 2016 [26] | Lowest uptake in Quintile 1 with uptake rates of 0.31 and 0.38 for males and females respectively, p < .001 Highest uptake in the Quintile 5, with uptake rates of 0.53 and 0.60 respectively, p < .001 |
Dalton et al., 2011 [24] | No significant effect of deprivation (p > .050) |
Gidlow et al., 2014 [9] | IMD Quintile 5 vs. 1: OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.23–2.05, p < .001 IMD Quintile 4 vs. 1: OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.06–1.61, p = .014 IMD Quintile 3 vs. 1: OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.03–1.49, p = .022 IMD Quintile 2 vs. 1: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.87–1.43, p = .395 Overall effect of deprivation p = .008 |
McDermott et al., 2018 [25] | IMD Quintile 4 vs. 1: AOR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.87–4.12, p < .001 IMD Quintile 3 vs. 1: AOR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.95–1.39, p = .156 IMD Quintile 2 vs. 1: AOR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.95–1.24, p = .214 (Note, no data was collected from Quintile 5 in this study) |
Sallis et al., 2016 [21] | IMD Quintile 5 vs. 1: AOR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.14–2.26, p < .010 All other comparisons against Quintile 1 (baseline) p > .010 |