Skip to main content

Table 2 Proportion of circumcised women across demographic variables

From: Health care-seeking patterns for female genital mutilation/cutting among young Somalis in Norway

Socio- demographic characteristic of women

Women FGM/C status

Statistics

P-value

 

Circumcised (n = 82)

Not circumcised (n = 77)

  

Health care-seeking for FGM/C-related health problems

16 (20.3)

–

–

–

Place of birth:

  

X2 = 64.12

< 0.0001

 Born in Norway

3 (3.8)

48 (64.9)

  

 Born out of Norway

76 (96.2)

26 (35.1)

  

Age distribution (years):

  

X2 = 0.01

0.89

 16 to 20

56 (69.1)

54 (70.1)

  

 21 to 25

25 (30.9)

23 (29.9)

  

Age at migration to Norway

  

X2 = 37.82

< 0.0001

 0 to 11 years

37 (45.1)

70 (90.9)

  

  ≥ 12 years

45 (54.9)

7 (9.1)

  

Education:

  

Fisher’s Exact

0.27

 University

8 (10.0)

13 (16.9)

  

 Secondary

43 (53.8)

46 (59.7)

  

 Primary

25 (31.3)

16 (20.8)

  

 Informal education

4 (5.0)

2 (2.6)

  

Marital status:

  

Fisher’s Exact

0.98

 Single

64 (81.0)

59 (81.9)

  

 Married

14 (17.7)

12 (16.7)

  

 Divorce

1(1.3)

1 (1.4)

  

Women in support of FGM/C:

  

X2 = 7.63

0.007

 No

67 (82.7)

74(96.1)

  

 Yes

14 (17.3)

3 (3.9)

  

Women stigmatized of FGM/C practice:

  

X2 = 1.14

0.28

 No

59 (75.6)

62 (82.7)

  

 Yes

19 (24.4)

13 (17.3)

 Â