Skip to main content

Table 1 Relative risk, exposure prevalence for PAF, PIF and estimated cases of non-EBF due to the exposures in Nigeria, 1999–2013

From: Population attributable risk of key modifiable risk factors associated with non-exclusive breastfeeding in Nigeria

Exposure

 

Cases /Total cases

Non-cases (controls)/Total controls

Relative Risk (95% CI)

Exposure Prevalence (a) (95% CI)

Estimated prevalence following intervention (a) (95% CI)

Maternal education

Secondary and above education

1669/5891

597/1087

1.00

54.9 (51.9–57.9)

54.9 (51.9–57.9)

Primary education

1192/5891

237/1087

1.32 (1.08–1.61)

21.8 (19.4–24.4)

22.9 (20.4–25.5)

No education

3030/5891

253/1087

1.96 (1.56–2.47)

23.3 (20.8–25.9)

22.2 (19.7–24.8)

Household wealth

Rich

980/5891

336/1087

1.00

32.2 (29.4–35.1)

32.2 (29.4–35.1)

Middle

2364/5891

462/1087

1.30 (1.07–1.58)

44.2 (41.2–47.3)

44.2 (41.2–47.3)

Poor

2366/5891

246/1087

1.79 (1.42–2.27)

23.6 (21.0–26.3)

23.6 (21.0–26.3)

Antenatal care visits

4+

2515/5891

711/1087

1.00

65.4 (62.6–68.3)

73.9 (71.2–76.5)

1–3

846/5891

133/1087

1.11 (0.89–1.39)

12.2 (10.4–14.3)

20.7 (18.3–23.3)

None

2522/5891

243/1087

1.42 (1.16–1.73)

22.4 (19.9–25.0)

5.3 (4.1–6.8)

Place of delivery

Health facility

1902/5891

649/1087

1.00

59.7 (56.7–62.6)

65.8 (62.9–68.6)

Home

3987/5891

438/1087

1.59 (1.33–1.90)

40.3 (37.4–43.3)

34.2 (31.4–37.1)

Delivery assistance

Health professionals

1876/5891

630/1087

1.00

58.0 (55.0–60.9)

64.2 (61.3–67.1)

Traditional birth attendants

1325/5891

114/1087

1.95 (1.42–2.67)

10.4 (8.7–12.5)

8.9 (7.3–10.8)

Untrained personnel

2687/5891

344/1087

1.32 (1.03–1.69)

31.6 (28.9–34.5)

27.0 (24.3–29.7)

  1. Cases: cases of non-EBF; non-cases (control): cases of EBF
  2. (a) Proportion is percent of exposed non-cases, an estimate of the exposure in the population. That is, non-cases as a proportion of total non-cases
  3. PAF: Population attributable fraction; PIF: Potential impact fraction
  4. For the calculation of the PIF: assumption of continued improvements in high-school completion rates in women [39] was made; impact fractions for maternal education were estimated assuming a 5% relative decrease in the proportion of women not completing high school from 23% to 22%. For antenatal visits, impact fractions were estimated assuming a reduction of 17% in women having no antenatal care (from 22% to 5%) [31, 32]. For delivery assistance and place of delivery, impact fractions were estimated assuming a relative reduction of 15% based on community-based interventions to improve exclusive breastfeeding practice [31]. No alternative scenario was defined for household wealth because of a lack of data relating to interventions resulting in income re-distribution