Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Socio-demographic and sexual practices associated with HIV infection in Kenyan injection and non-injection drug users

BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201818:193

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5100-y

  • Received: 20 February 2017
  • Accepted: 18 January 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Substance use is increasingly becoming prevalent on the African continent, fueling the spread of HIV infection. Although socio-demographic factors influence substance consumption and risk of HIV infection, the association of these factors with HIV infection is poorly understood among substance users on the African continent. The objective of the study was to assess socio-demographic and sexual practices that are associated with HIV infection among injection drug users (IDUs), non-IDUs, and non-drug users (DUs) at an urban setting of coastal Kenya.

Methods

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 451 adults comprising HIV-infected and -uninfected IDUs (n = 157 and 39); non-IDUs (n = 17 and 48); and non-DUs (n = 55 and 135); respectively at coastal, Kenya. Respondent driven sampling, snowball and makeshift methods were used to enroll IDUs and non-IDUs. Convenience and purposive sampling were used to enroll non-DUs from the hospital’s voluntary HIV testing unit. Participant assisted questionnaire was used in collecting socio-demographic data and sexual practices.

Results

Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that higher likelihood of HIV infection was associated with sex for police protection (OR, 9.526; 95% CI, 1.156-78.528; P = 0.036) and history of sexually transmitted infection (OR, 5.117; 95% CI, 1.924-13.485; P = 0.001) in IDUs; divorced, separated or widowed marital status (OR, 6.315; 95% CI, 1.334-29.898; P = 0.020) in non-IDUs; and unemployment (OR, 2.724; 95% CI, 1.049-7.070; P = 0.040) in non-drug users. However, never married (single) marital status (OR, 0.140; 95% CI, 0.030-0.649; P = 0.012) was associated with lower odds for HIV infection in non-drug users.

Conclusion

Altogether, these results suggest that socio-demographic and sexual risk factors for HIV transmission differ with drug use status, suggesting targeted preventive measures for drug users.

Keywords

  • HIV infection
  • Injection drug users (IDUs)
  • Non-IDUs
  • Non-drug users
  • Socio-demographic and sexual risk practices

Background

Consumption of psychoactive substances is an increasing public health problem in the world [1]. An estimated 250 million people between the ages of 15 and 64 years used an illicit drug in 2014 with at least 29 million suffering drug use disorders [2]. Both injection and non-injection substance consumption constitute the global burden of substance use with Africa having as estimated 28 million substance users [2]. The burden of substance use in Africa is compounded by the increasing availability of injection illicit drugs such as heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine especially in peri-urban and urban settings [35]. Kenya, like other countries in Africa, is experiencing an alarming increase in the burden of drug use with about 37.1% of the population reporting having used a substance in their life time [6].

Social demographic factors such as the level of education, gender, income and marital status are primary determinants of the health status of drug users [7]. These factors indirectly influence individual drug-use behavior including sharing of needles and soliciting for sex in exchange for drugs or police protection [8, 9]. Directly, these factors predict familial support, nutritional status, adherence to medication and recovery from drug use or addiction [1012]. Globally, drug-related activity has been associated with age, low level of education, familial dysfunction, unemployment, poverty, drug-related violence and gang activity [13, 14].

Despite availability of antiretroviral (ARV) treatments, HIV infection remains a major public health problem especially in Sub-Saharan Africa. This burden has been partly attributed to recreation drug use which increases the risk of HIV infection and poor adherence to ARVs [11, 15]. At the end of 2015, approximately 36.7 million people were living with HIV/AIDS in the world. During the same period it is estimated that around 13 million people injected drugs of whom 1.7 million were living with HIV. An estimated 70% of people living with HIV infection reside in sub-Saharan Africa [16, 17]. In Kenya, 1.5 million people consisting of 18,327 injection substance users were living with HIV as at the end of 2016. The current prevalence of HIV in injection substance users in the country stands at 18.3% which is higher than that in the general population [18].

Majority of drug users transit from use of non-injection to injection substances or simultaneously use both substances [1921]. Furthermore, substance consumption differentially predicts HIV infection. For example, previous studies in Texas, USA and China showed that injection substance users have an increased risk of HIV infection in comparison to non-injecting drug users [22, 23]. In Kenya, predictors of HIV in the general population include low income, marital separation, sex work, exposure to sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and gender [24]. In the injection substance using population, high risk sexual practices, exposure to STIs, sexual violence, sharing of needles and syringes as well as poly-substance use are associated with higher rates of HIV infection [4, 25]. Elsewhere, alcohol, khat, marijuana and methamphetamine use are associated with HIV in non-injection substance users [2628]. However, in Kenya and by extension Africa, information on comparative socio-demographic factors that predict HIV trends in IDUs, non-IDUs and non-drug users is scantly documented. This study therefore sought to fill this gap by investigating the socio-demographic patterns and sexual practices predicting HIV infection among IDUs in comparison to non-IDUs and non-DUs in Coastal Kenya.

Methods

Study design, setting and participants

This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in July, 2012 - February, 2013 in Mombasa city, Coastal Kenya. Upon obtaining written informed consent, 451 participants were enrolled of which 196 (HIV-infected, n = 157 and -uninfected, n = 39) were injection drug users, 65 non-injection drug users (HIV-infected, n = 17 and -uninfected, n = 48) and 190 non-drug users (HIV-infected, n = 135 and n = 55 -uninfected). Several sampling methods were used as these findings are part of a larger study. The IDUs and non-IDUs were recruited via respondent driven sampling (RDS), snowball and makeshift outreach methods.

Recruitment using RDS was initiated with three seeds who were known drug users from the drug users’ receiving addiction counseling at Bomu hospital. Each seed was given three uniquely coloured coupons with which they used to recruit peers within Mombasa County. These recruited peers were considered as the first wave of participants. Each participant in the first wave who completed the interview was then provided six coupons with which to recruit their peers. Interviews were conducted by research assistants who are trained community health workers. Successive waves of recruitment continued until the waves died (no more participants were being enrolled) before the desired sample size was achieved. At this stage only 148 IDUs and non-IDUs had been recruited. Snowball sampling and makeshift outreach methods were then used to directly recruitment from drug havens by a rehabilitated former injection drug user 113 IDUs and non-IDUs. Convenience and purposive samplings were used to recruit non-drug users who were drop in clients in the hospitals’ HIV voluntary counseling and testing unit. Interviews were conducted by trained community health workers.

The current injection drug users were defined as persons who injected for recreational purpose at least once a day regularly, at the time of the study. Observation of the needle scars was a necessary criterion for their enrollment. The non-IDUs were persons who had never injected drugs during their lifetime but were using one or more non-injection drugs listed in the world drug report [2]. Non-drug users were persons who had never used either injection or non-injection drugs in their lifetime [2]. In addition, eligibility criteria were limited to people who at the time of recruitment were 18 years and above, lived in Mombasa and had provided written informed consent.

Demographic and sexual practice information

Pilot testing was carried out at Bomu Wema Centre, an outreach clinic in Kisauni sub-county, Mombasa city. Participant assisted questionnaire was administered in English or Swahili by trained community health workers at Bomu Hospital in Changamwe sub-county, Mombasa city. This questionnaire was used to capture the following socio-demographic characteristics; gender, age, level of education, marital status, religion, occupation and income per month. Using the same tool, sexual orientation, age of sexual debut, number of sexual partners, having had unprotected sex, having had sex for police protection or drugs and history of STI was captured.

HIV testing

HIV testing was performed by trained VCT counselors using Determine™ (Abbott Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan) and Unigold™ (Trinity Biotech Plc, Bray, Ireland) and the results were communicated back within 5 to 10 min. Study participants with positive results for both Determine and Unigold were considered HIV infected based on the Kenya National Guidelines for HIV Testing and Counseling [29].

Ethical considerations

The study was conducted according to the Helsinki declaration and ethical approval was obtained from the Kenyatta University Ethics Review Committee. Participation in the study was voluntary and written informed consent was obtained from the subjects prior to enrolment in to the study. Confidentiality of participants was observed throughout the study and all participants received free health education on sexually transmitted infections and HIV.

Statistical analyses

Data analyses were conducted using SPSS, version 20 (IBM SPSS Inc., New York, USA). Pearson’s Chi-square test was used determine the distribution of proportions of independent variables among the HIV infected and uninfected study groups. Age was summarized as medians and compared amongst the study groups using Kruskal Wallis test followed by Dunns post-hoc corrections. Subsequently, binary logistic regressions were performed to identify those factors that were independently associated with HIV infection within IDUs, non-IDUs and non-drug users. In these analyses, variables previously associated with illicit drug use and/or HIV infection in Kenya like education, marital status, religion, occupation, income, sexual orientation, age of sex debut, number of sexual partners, unprotected sex, sex for police protection, sex for drugs and history of STIs [4, 25, 30, 31], including those that showed P < 0.1 in the chi-square analyses were entered as independent predictor variables, and HIV status as dependent variable controlling for age and gender. All tests were two-tailed and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

Table 1 shows the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants. Median age, primary or lack of education, marital separation, Islam religion and earning an income of more than US$ 172.8 were significantly higher among HIV infected injection drug users relative to non-injection drug users and non-drug users (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). In addition, the proportions of sex work and entertainment or beauty therapy occupations were higher in injection drug users in comparison to non-injection drug users and non-drug users.
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants

Characteristic

Non-DU

Non-IDU

IDU

P

HIV[−], n = 135

HIV[+], n = 55

HIV[−], n = 48

HIV[+], n = 17

HIV[−], n = 39

HIV[+], n = 157

Female

75 (55.6)

29 (52.7)

19 (39.6)

6 (35.3)

14 (35.9)

86 (54.8)

0.081

Median age (IQR), yrs.

30.0 (14.3)

41.7 (14.2)

30.4 (11.8)

30.4 (11.0)

26.8 (5.2)a

30.6 (6.5)

< 0.0001

Education

 Secondary or college

74 (54.8)

25 (45.4)

22 (45.9)

6 (35.3)

12 (30.8)

35 (22.3)

< 0.0001

 Primary or none

61 (45.2)

30 (54.6)

26 (54.2)

11 (64.7)

27 (69.3)

122 (76.7)

Marital status

 Married

59 (43.7)

28 (50.9)

23 (47.9)

5 (29.4)

9 (23.1)

17 (10.8)

< 0.0001

 Never married (single)

52 (38.5)

2 (3.6)

12 (25.0)

2 (11.8)

20 (51.3)

44 (28.0)

 Divorced, separated or widowed

24 (9.6)

25 (45.5)

13 (27.2)

10 (58.8)

10 (25.6)

96 (61.1)

Religion

 Catholic

50 (37.0)

11 (20.0)

18 (37.5)

5 (29.4)

11 (28.2)

43 (27.4)

< 0.0001

 Protestant

54 (40.0)

33 (60.0)

18 (37.5)

6 (35.3)

5 (12.8)

36 (22.9)

 Muslim

31 (23.0)

11 (20.0)

12 (25.0)

6 (35.3)

23 (59.0)

78 (49.7)

Occupation

 CSW

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

6 (15.4)

35 (22.3)

 Entertainment or beauty therapy

5 (3.7)

3 (5.5)

3 (6.3)

2 (11.8)

3 (7.7)

41 (26.1)

 Transport

12 (8.9)

6 (10.9)

9 (18.8)

4 (23.5)

13 (33.3)

35 (22.3)

 Hospitality

7 (5.2)

3 (5.5)

8 (16.7)

2 (11.8)

3 (7.7)

10 (6.4)

 Small business

35 (25.9)

25 (45.5)

13 (27.1)

5 (29.4)

12 (30.8)

27 (17.2)

 Service

26 (19.3)

11 (20.0)

10 (20.8)

2 (11.8)

2 (5.1)

4 (2.5)

 Unemployed

50 (37.0)

7 (12.7)

5 (10.4)

2 (11.8)

0 (0.0)

5 (3.2)

Income, Kshs/montha

  > 15,000

27 (20.0)

13 (23.6)

13 (27.1)

3 (17.6)

26 (66.7)

127 (80.9)

< 0.0001

 5000-15,000

48 (35.6)

22 (40.0)

22 (45.8)

7 (41.2)

11 (28.2)

25 (15.9)

  < 5000

60 (44.4)

20 (36.4)

13 (27.1)

7 (41.2)

2 (5.1)

5 (3.2)

Data are presented as number and proportions (%) of subjects, unless otherwise indicated. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Pearson’s chi-square. Non-DU, non-drug users. Non-IDU non-injection drug users, IDU injection drug users. aAs at June 30th 2016, US$ was equivalent to KShs 86.8 aP < 0.01 vs. HIV-infected and uninfected IDUs and non-DUs. Values in bold indicate significant P-values

Sexual practices

The proportions of participants reporting early age sexual debut, > 1 sexual partners, unprotected sex and history of sexually transmitted infections (all P < 0.0001) was significantly higher in HIV-infected injection drug users than in non-injection drug users and non-drug users (Table 2). Likewise, the frequency of bisexuality, homosexuality, sex for police protection as well as sex for drugs was higher in HIV-infected injection drug users as compared to non-injection drug users and non-drug users (Table 2).
Table 2

Sexual practices and history of sexually transmitted infections

Characteristic

Non-DU

Non-IDU

IDU

P

HIV[−], n = 135

HIV[+], n = 55

HIV[−], n = 48

HIV[+], n = 17

HIV[−], n = 39

HIV[+], n = 157

Sexual orientation

 Bisexual

1 (0.7)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (5.1)

13 (8.3)

 Heterosexual

134 (99.3)

55 (100.0)

47 (97.9)

17 (100.0)

35 (89.7)

131 (83.4)

 Homosexual

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.1)

0 (0.0)

2 (5.1)

13 (8.3)

Age of sex debut < 15 years

36 (26.7)

10 (18.2)

13 (27.1)

5 (29.4)

8 (20.5)

76 (48.4)

< 0.0001

No. of sexual partners

 0

25 (18.5)

21 (38.2)

10 (20.8)

4 (23.5)

3 (7.7)

5 (3.2)

< 0.0001

 1

85 (63.0)

27 (49.1)

28 (58.3)

9 (52.9)

17 (43.6)

49 (31.2)

  > 1

25 (18.5

7 (12.7)

10 (20.8)

4 (23.5)

19 (48.7)

103 (65.6)

Unprotected sex

14 (10.4)

7 (12.7)

14 (29.2)

5 (29.4)

7 (17.9)

49 (31.2)

< 0.0001

Sex for police protection

0 (0.0)

1 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.6)

34 (21.7)

Sex for drugs

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (5.9)

7 (17.9)

39 (24.8)

History of STI

52 (38.5)

31 (56.4)

26 (54.2)

8 (47.1)

9 (23.1)

102 (65.0)

< 0.0001

Data are presented as number and proportions (%) of subjects. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Pearson’s chi-square. Non-DU, non-drug users. Non-IDU non-injection drug users. IDU injection drug users, STI sexually transmitted infection. Values in bold indicate significant P-values

Association of socio-demographic characteristics, sexual practice and HIV status

To identify the predictors of HIV infection, binary logistic regression was conducted separately for each study group (injection drug users, non-injection drug users and non-drug users) such that all HIV infected individuals were modeled against all of the HIV negative individuals controlling for age and gender. Data were presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (Table 3). These analyses illustrated that HIV infection was associated with divorced, separated or widowed marital status (OR, 2.768; 95% CI, 0.888-8.633; P = 0.079); small businesses (OR, 2.454; 95% CI, 0.944-6.376; P = 0.065); age of sex debut < 15 years (OR, 2.547; 95% CI, 0.965-6.723; P = 0.059) and > 1 sexual partners (OR, 2.021; 95% CI, 0.925-4.415; P = 0.078); sex for police protection (OR, 9.526; 95% CI, 1.156-78.528; P = 0.036) and history of sexually transmitted infection (OR, 5.117; 95% CI, 1.924-13.485; P = 0.001) among injection drug users; divorced, separated or widowed marital status (OR, 6.315; 95% CI, 1.334-29.898; P = 0.020) in non-injection drug users; and unemployment (OR, 2.724; 95% CI, 1.049-7.070; P = 0.040) and history of sexually transmitted infections (OR, 1.838; 95% CI, 0.909-3.717; P = 0.090) in non-drug users. In contrast, single marital status (OR, 0.140; 95% CI, 0.030-0.649; P = 0.012) was linked to HIV infection amongst non-drug users.
Table 3

Socio-demographic and sexual practices associated with HIV infection

Characteristic

Non-DU

Non-IDU

IDU

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

P-value

Education

 Secondary or college

Ref

 

Ref

 

Ref

 

 Primary or none

1.042 (0.520-2.089)

0.907

1.710 (0.512-5.711)

0.383

1.499 (0.647-3.475)

0.345

Marital status

 Married

Ref

 

Ref

 

Ref

 

 Never married (single)

0.140 (0.030-0.649)

0.012

0. 926 (0.135-6.336)

0.938

0.827 (0.290-2.360)

0.723

 Divorced, separated or widowed

1.804 (0.810-4.016)

0.149

6.315 (1.334-29.898)

0.020

2.768 (0.888-8.633)

0.079

Religion

 Catholic

Ref

 

Ref

 

Ref

 

 Protestant

0.715 (0.256-2.000)

0.523

1.216 (0.312-4.734)

0.778

1.230 (0.365-4.146)

0.738

 Muslim

1.858 (0.749-4.610)

0.182

1.753 (0.426-7.221)

0.437

0.866 (0.343-2.183)

0.760

Occupationa

 CSW

 

0.992 (0.932-1.057)

0.806

1.443 (0.471-4.424)

0.521

 Entertainment or beauty therapy

1.483 (0.309-7.118)

0.622

2.351 (0.325-17.002)

0.397

2.790 (0.699-11.138)

0.146

 Transport

0.838 (0.263-2.667)

0.764

1.305 (0.328-5.201)

0.706

1.196 (0.440-3.259)

0.725

 Hospitality

0.718 (0.160-3.233)

0.666

1.414 (0.251-7.962)

0.695

1.285 (0.291-5.683)

0.741

 Small business

0.561 (0.275-1.142)

0.111

0.920 (0.267-3.165)

0.894

2.454 (0.944-6.376)

0.065

 Service

1.241 (0.515-2.993)

0.631

0.467 (0.089-2.466)

0.370

3.352 (0.452-24.820)

0.236

 Unemployed

2.724 (1.049-7.070)

0.040

1.179 (0.202-6.885)

0.855

Income, US$/mos.

  > 172.8

Ref

 

Ref

 

Ref

 

 57.6-172.8

0.883 (0.361-2.161)

0.785

1.498 (0.318-7.053)

0.609

0.540 (0.213-1.367)

0.193

  < 57.6

0.804 (0.318-2.035)

0.646

2.686 (0.528-13.676)

0.234

0.893 (0.127-6.255)

0.909

Sexual practicesa

 Homosexual or bisexual

2.501 (0.726-8.611)

0.146

 Age of sex debut < 15 years

1.254 (0.539-2.919)

0.599

1.183 (0.325-4.310)

0.799

2.547 (0.965-6.723)

0.059

  > 1 sexual partners

1.261 (0.461-3.392)

0.660

1.116 (0.290-4.292)

0.873

2.021 (0.925-4.415)

0.078

 Unprotected sex

2.134 (0.738-6.168)

0.162

1.053 (0.305-3.636)

0.935

0.772 (0.276-2.160)

0.621

 Sex for police protection

9.526 (1.156-78.528)

0.036

 Sex for drugs

1.159 (0.437-3.073)

0.767

 History of STI

1.838 (0.909-3.717)

0.090

1.407 (0.422-4.694)

0.578

5.117 (1.924-13.485)

0.001

Binary logistic regression was conducted separately for each study group (IDU, non-IDU and non-DU) such that all HIV infected individuals were modeled against all of the HIV negative individuals controlling for age, and gender. Anon-practitioners of the listed occupations or practices were used as the reference category. Data are presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). IDU injection drug users, Non-DU non-drug users, CSW commercial sex worker, STI sexually transmitted infection

Discussion

In the current study, we show that HIV infected individuals were at least 30 years old among the injection drug users, suggesting that older age may be a risk factor of HIV infection in this cohort of Kenyan injection drug users. This finding is similar to previous prospective studies in China and Canada showing that an age of at least 25 years predicts HIV infection [32, 33]. In part, this suggests that increasing exposure to sexual behavioral and injection risk practices increases with age among injection drug users. This hypothesis is consistent with previous studies among Chinese injection drug users showing that HIV positivity was associated a longer history of injection drug use and experience of needle and syringe sharing [22]. Strategies aimed at harm reduction, for example, through provision of free needles and safe commercial sexual practices may, therefore, lower HIV infection rates among injection substance using communities.

The higher rates of low education of at least 70% in both HIV infected and uninfected injection drug users, suggest that education is an important determinant of substance use. These results are in part comparable to recent studies in China showing that lower education levels are associated with unsafe injection practices in injection drug users [34] and results of a drug addiction treatment study in Iran indicating that at least 60% of drug users were having less than high school education [35]. Little or no education reflects low awareness on the effects of drug consumption, initiation into drug use, risk factors and safe injection practices. In support of this fact, previous studies show that school drop-out predicts initiation into drug use [35, 36]. Additionally, low education among injection drug users indicates a likelihood of needle sharing and non-participation in HIV interventions [3739].

Consistent with previous studies in the Iran, USA and Taiwan showing that marital separation, divorce and widowhood were associated with increased risk of HIV infection in injection drug users [4042]. The rates of individuals reporting being divorced, separated or widowed were high among all the infected groups. In regression analyses controlling for confounders, these individuals were still more likely to be HIV infected in the injection and non-injection drug users. The divorced, widowed or separated individuals form one of the high HIV risk groups in Kenya [43]. However, it is not known whether these individuals acquire the infections pre- and/or post-separation of the marital unions. A number of interacting factors may expose such persons to risk of getting infected. For instance, following loss of a marital partner and loss of income, an individual may choose occupations that increase risk of infection. In contrast, individuals reporting never married marital status were fewer in the infected study groups and were less likely to be HIV infected in the non-drug users. These results are, in part, similar to retrospective demographic and health surveys across Africa showing that married, widowed and divorced women were more likely to be HIV positive compared to never married women [44]. While the underlying reasons for these lower rates remain to be elucidated it is likely that this group is younger, more educated and hence more informed about HIV risk and preventive measures. This assertion is partly supported by previous studies in Tanzania showing that single women with secondary or higher education were less likely to have multiple sexual partners and use condoms than married women with no education [45, 46].

Although Muslim religious affiliation was not independently associated with HIV infection in the regression analyses; Muslims accounted for a majority of HIV infected (49.7%) and uninfected (59.0%) injection substance users. Consistent with the high frequency of Muslims in the HIV infected and uninfected substance users also had higher rates of primary or below primary education levels of 76.7% and 69.3%, respectively. These figures are comparable to results of previous surveys illustrating higher prevalence (69%) of primary or lack of primary education among the Muslim communities at coastal Kenya [47]. In fact, a lack of education, primary education and failure to complete high school are linked to illicit drug use or injection equipment sharing at several coastal Kenya cities [29, 35, 48, 49]. This supports a paradigm of low levels or lack of education driving injection substance among the Muslim communities at coastal Kenya.

It was noted that the frequency of small business and unemployment were, respectively, fewer in HIV-infected non-drug users and injection drug users. But in regression models adjusting for confounders, engaging in small business and being unemployed were associated with likelihood of HIV-infection in non-drug users and injection drug users, respectively. All these scenarios point to involvement in low income occupations as the main contributor to risk of HIV infection. This is supported by previous studies in Canada showing associations between stimulant drug use and engaging in low-threshold employment [50] and studies in Spain showing higher prevalence of HIV infection among unemployed injection drug users [51]. This result may be related to likely additional engagement in secondary occupations to supplement income such as sex for cash. Individuals in small business and unemployed injection drug users may thus be targeted for spreading HIV prevention social marketing interventions [52]. The finding of more individuals with higher income levels in both HIV-infected and -uninfected injection drug users, partly relates to class subsets in the drug injection communities at this coastal region of Kenya. In addition, studies among injection drug users in the United States indicate that income is a key determinant of low-to-high use and low-to-high risk classes of injection drug users [53]. Subsequently, income levels may determine the frequency of injection, affordability of drug injection equipment and involvement in risky sexual practices. Therefore, we advocate for the integration of income generating programs into the intervention and rehabilitation packages of injection drug users to improve their quality of life and prevent reversion.

Nearly 50 % of the injection drug users reporting sex debut at age less than 15 years were HIV infected. These results remained predictive of the HIV infection in injection drug users even after controlling for confounders in the regression analyses. This finding differs from data from demographic and health surveys conducted from Uganda, Tanzania, South Africa, Zimbabwe and Malawi showing that age to first sex ranged from 17 to 19 years and 16-19 years for males and females, respectively [54]. Age is an important component of sex and reproductive health of a person. At a young age an individual is still a minor and incapable of making informed decisions regarding safer sex. Such underage persons are also prone to sexual and/or physical abuse that is frequently associated with risk of HIV acquisition. According to the Kenya 2012 HIV risk estimates, 21% of young adults aged 15 to 24 years reported sexual debut before 15 years of age [43] compared to 48.4% in HIV-infected injection drug users in the current study. The interrelationships of these factors mirror previous studies in Russia illustrating that age at first drink is associated with multiple sex partners and age of sex debut [55]. Young people in Mombasa may thus be initiating substance use and sex work at a young age to escape ravages of poverty but exposing to risk of infection.

Having more than one sexual partner and engaging in sex for police protection were identified as important sexual practices predicting HIV infection among injection drug users. These findings are consistent with previous studies in the same area showing that injection drug users report multiple past and new sex partners [36] and studies in South Africa showing complex interacting economies of drugs and sex work whereby sex was exchanged for drugs [56]. Multiplicity of sexual partners often increases the risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections including HIV [17, 40]. While this finding is consistent with the results of the Kenya AIDS Indicator Survey, 2012 for the general population [43] similar studies have shown associations between multiple sexual partnerships and trading sex for drugs in HIV positive Tanzanian heroin users [8]. For the first time we show that sex for police protection was associated with higher likelihood of having HIV infection in this Kenyan cohort of injection drug users. These findings mirror previous studies in Pakistan indicating that harassment, abuse and exploitation of vulnerable groups (including injection drug users, sex workers and men who have sex with men). These violations frequently result from non-state actors such as relations and sex worker clients, and state actors such as the police [57]. In the current study, it appears that injection drug users submit to sex for police protection to avoid arrest and imprisonment, hence, targeted programs for HIV prevention should also include the police and other state actors.

Consistent with previous studies [22, 58] higher rates of unprotected sex and a history of sexually transmitted infections were associated with HIV infection among injection drug users. These results suggest that high risk sexual practices especially while intoxicated exposes to unlimited risk of HIV transmission. Previous studies among Iranian injection drug users in harm-reduction drop-in centers and Brazilian crack users indicated that unsafe sex risk practices including unprotected sex are associated with risk of HIV infection [59, 60]. Likewise, previous studies in the US showed that injection drug use is associated with high risk of sexually transmitted infections [40]. We, therefore, advocate for programs targeting behavioral change and treatment of sexually transmitted infections in curbing the high HIV menace among the injection drug users.

Conclusion

In summary, we found that multiple risk factors contribute to HIV infection. Predictors of HIV infection in this cohort of coastal Kenyan injection drug users include sex for police protection and history of sexually transmitted infections. Among non-IDUs marital separation predicted HIV infection while having never been married, being unemployed and a history of STIs were predictive of HIV status among the non drug users. Since the study design was cross-sectional, it is difficult to know the time-point of HIV contact. A longitudinal approach would therefore yield more detailed information on sexual practices link to acquisition of HIV infection. Furthermore, self-reported exposure to sexually transmitted infections and sexual practices may be confounded by recall bias. Moreover, drug use was based on self-reported history which is prone to social desirability bias.

We recommend future studies to confirm drug use via appropriate testing methods like hair, saliva and urine analysis. We recommend similar studies to be replicated in other parts of the country where studies based on self reported drug use have been carried out before. Since drug use is a socio-medical problem, we recommend interventions that are anchored on a multi-sectoral approach. This approach need to encompass improvement in school enrollment and retention, upscale drug prevention awareness campaigns, psycho-therapy, treatment, support groups as well as financial empowerment. In addition, as part of injection drug use targeted interventions for state actors (lawmakers, law enforcers and criminal justice authorities) should be provided with educational programs on human rights, safety and public health interventions.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank the study participants, management and staff of the Bomu Hospital for their cooperation and support during the study.

Funding

This study was partly supported by the Kenya National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation [NCST/5/003/065].

Availability of data and materials

The data sets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author(s) on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

VB, TW, MFO, CM and AAA designed the study. TW and JO performed statistical analyses. TW and VB co-drafted the manuscript. MFO, CM critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declarations. Ethical approval for the study was sought and granted from Kenyatta University Ethical Review Committee (PKU019/116 of 2012). Written informed consent either in English or Swahili was obtained from each participant before enrolment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Environment and Health Sciences, Technical University of Mombasa, P. O. Box 90420-80100, Mombasa, Kenya
(2)
Department of Applied Sciences, Technical University of Mombasa, P. O. Box 90420-80100, Mombasa, Kenya
(3)
Department of Environmental Health, University of Kabianga, P. O. Box 2030-20200, Kericho, Kenya
(4)
Bomu Hospital, P.O Box 95683-80106, Mombasa, Kenya
(5)
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Kenyatta University, P. O. Box 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
(6)
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 190-50100, Kakamega, Kenya

References

  1. WHO, 2017. http://www.who.int/topics/substance_abuse/en/. Accessed 8 Feb 2017.
  2. UNODC, 2016. World drug report 2016. https://www.unodc.org/doc/wdr2016/WORLD_DRUG_REPORT_2016_web.pdf.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hobkirk AL, Watt MH, Myers B, Skinner D, Meade CS. A qualitative study of methamphetamine initiation in cape town, South Africa. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;30:99–106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Syvertsena JL, Agot K, Ohaga S, Strathdee SA, Camlind CS, Omanga E, Odonde P, Rota G, Akothe K, Pengf J, Wagner KD. Evidence of injection drug use in Kisumu, Kenya: implications for HIV prevention. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;151:262–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Werb D, Kerr T, Nosyk B, Strathdee S, Montaner J, Wood E. The temporal relationship between drug supply indicators: an audit of international government surveillance systems. Br Med J. 2013;3(9):e003077.Google Scholar
  6. NACADA, 2012. Rapid situation assessment of the status of drug and substance abuse National Commission against Drug Abuse, Kenya.Google Scholar
  7. Budambula V and Budambula LMN (2017). Chasing the dragon: drug use and abuse ISBN-10: 9966103023/ISBN-13: 978-9966103024.Google Scholar
  8. Atkinson J, McCurdy S, Williams M, Mbwambo J, Kilonzo G. HIV risk behaviors, perceived severity of drug use problems, and prior treatment experience in a sample of young heroin injectors in Dar es salaam, Tanzania. African J Drug Alcohol Stud. 2011;10:1–9.Google Scholar
  9. Odinokova V, Rusakova M, Urada LA, Silverman JG, Raj A. Police sexual coercion and its association with risky sex work and substance use behaviours among female sex workers in St Petersburg and Orenburg, Russia. Int J Drug Policy. 2014;25:96–104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Shannon K, Kerr T, Milloy M, et al. Severe food insecurity is associated with elevated unprotected sex among HIV-seropositive injection drug users independent of HAART use. AIDS. 2011;25:2037–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Wakibi SN, Ng’ang’a ZW, Mbugua GG. Factors associated with non-adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy in Nairobi, Kenya. AIDS Res Ther. 2011;8:43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Yang M, Mamy J, Gao P, Xiao S. From abstinence to relapse: a preliminary qualitative study of drug users in a compulsory drug rehabilitation Center in Changsha, China. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0130711.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Khajedaluee M, Dadgarmoghaddam M, Erfanian M, Alipourtabrizi A, Khadem-Rezaiyan M. Women, drug dependency and consequences: a study from a developing country. J Addict. 2015;2015:831954.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Mehrabi M, Eskandarieh S, Khodadost M, Sadeghi M, Nikfarjam A, Hajebi A. The impact of social structures on deviant behaviors: the study of 402 high risk street drug users in Iran. J Addict. 2016;2016:6891751.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Bhatti AB, Usman M, Kandi V. Current scenario of HIV/AIDS, treatment options, and major challenges with compliance to antiretroviral therapy. Cureus. 2016;8(3):e515.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. UNAIDS. 2016. http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet. Accessed 8 Feb 2017.
  17. WHO. Sexually transmitted infections. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2016.Google Scholar
  18. NACC, 2016. http://nacc.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Kenya-AIDS-Progress-Report_web.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2017.
  19. Barry D, Syed H, Smyth BP. The journey into injecting heroin use. Heroin Addict Related Clin Probl. 2012;14(3):89–100.Google Scholar
  20. Trenz RC, Scherer M, Harrell P, Zur J, Sinha A, Latimer W. Early onset of drug and Polysubstance use as predictors of injection drug use among adult drug users. Addict Behav. 2012;37(4):367–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellen T. Women’s injection drug practices in their own words: a qualitative study. Harm Reduction J. 2015;12:6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Li J, Liu H, Li J, Luo J, Jarlais DD, Koram N. Role of sexual transmission of HIV among young non-injection and injection opiate users: a respondent driven sampling study. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(12):1161–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Noor SWB, Ross MW, Lai D, Risser JM. Drug and sexual HIV risk behaviours related to knowledge of HIV serostatus among injection drug users in Houston, Texas. Int J STD AIDS. 2014;25(2):89–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. NASCOP. 2014. National AIDS and STI Control Programme (NASCOP), Kenya. Kenya AIDS Indicator Survey 2012: Final Report. Nairobi, NASCOP. June 2014.Google Scholar
  25. Tun W, Sheehy M, Broz D, Okal J, Muraguri N, Raymond HF, Geibel S. HIV and STI prevalence and injection behaviors among people who inject drugs in Nairobi: results from a 2011 bio-behavioral study using respondent-driven sampling. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(1):24–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kiwanuka N, Ssetaala A, Nalutaaya A, Mpendo J, Wambuzi M, Nanvubya A, et al. High incidence of HIV-1 infection in a general population of fishing communities around Lake Victoria, Uganda. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e94932.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Meade CS, Lion RR, Cordero DM, Watt M, Joska JA, Gouse H, Burnhams W. HIV risk behavior among methamphetamine users entering substance abuse treatment in cape town, South Africa. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(10):2387–97.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Tesfalem AW, Ayelign MW. Drugs (alcohol/Khat) use stimulants and as risk factor for HIV/AIDS infection, among provider initiated counseling and testing (PICT) visitors in gore town, Oromia, Ethiopia. Am J Health Res. 2015;3(5):643–9.Google Scholar
  29. NASCOP. Guidelines for HIV testing and counseling and Kenya national AIDS and STI control Programme. Kenya: Ministry of Health; 2010.Google Scholar
  30. Budambula V, Ahmed A, Otieno M and Were T, (2013). Factors influencing HIV infection among youth injecting drugs in Mombasa County. Second NACADA Conference accessed via http://www.nacada.co.ke.Google Scholar
  31. Madise JN, Ziraba AK, Inungu J, Khamadi SA, Ezeh A, Zulu EM, Kebaso J, Okoth V, Mwau M. Are slum dwellers at heightened risk of HIV infection than other urban residents? Evidence from population-based HIV prevalence surveys in Kenya. Health Place. 2012;18(5):1144–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Roy É, Godin G, Boudreau JF, Cote PB, Denis V, Haley N, Leclerc P, Boivin J. Modeling initiation into drug injection among street youth. J Drug Educ. 2011;41:119–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang D, Bi P, Lv F, Zhang J, Hiller JE. Changes in HIV prevalence and sexual behavior among men who have sex with men in a northern Chinese city: 2002–2006. J Infect. 2007;55(5):456–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Chen B, Zhu Y, Guo R, Ding S, Zhang Z, Cai H, Zhu H, Wen Y. HIV/AIDS-related knowledge awareness and risk behaviors among injection drug users in Maanshan, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:97.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Noroozi M, Nedjat S, Golestan B, Majdzadeh R. What are differences between non-injecting and injecting drug addicts? Int J Prev Med. 2012;3:414–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Brodish P, Singh K, Rinyuri A, Njeru C, Kingola N, Mureithi P, Sambisa W, Weir S. Evidence of high-risk sexual behaviors among injection drug users in the Kenya PLACE study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;119:138–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Gajendra KM, Jagadish M, Ramesh SP, Rajatashuvra A, Senjam GS, Akoijam SB, Goswami P. Factors associated with ever HIV testing among injecting drug users (IDUs) in two HIV high prevalent states of India. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136:64–71.Google Scholar
  38. Medhi KG, Jagadish M, Ramesh SP, Rajatashuvra A, Senjam GS. Factors associated with ever HIV testing among injecting drug users (IDUs) in two HIV high prevalent states of India. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136:64–71.Google Scholar
  39. Swe LA, Nyo KK, Rashid A. Risk behaviours among HIV positive injecting drug users in Myanmar: a case control study. Harm Reduction J. 2010;7:12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Khan MR, Berger A, Hemberg J, O'Neill A, Dyer TP, Smyrk K. Non-injection and injection drug use and STI/HIV risk in the United States: the degree to which sexual risk behaviors versus sex with an STI-infected partner account for infection transmission among drug users. AIDS Behav. 2012;17:1185–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Majidpour A, Majidpour M, Motlag QM. Prevalence of hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and human immune-deficiency virus infections among intravenous drug users in the MAH-o-MEHR harm reduction Center of Tehran, Iran. J AIDS HIV Res. 2012;46:152–8.Google Scholar
  42. Yen YF, Yen MY, Ting L, Li LH, Jiang XR, Chou P and Deng CY (2014). Prevalence and factors associated with HIV infection among injection drug users at methadone clinics in Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  43. NASCOP. Kenya AIDS indicator survey 2012 report. National AIDS and STI control Programme. Kenya: Ministry of Health; 2013.Google Scholar
  44. Tenkorang EY. Marriage, widowhood, divorce and HIV risks among women in sub-Saharan Africa. Int Health. 2014;6(1):46–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Exavery A, Kanté AM, Jackson E, Noronha J, Sikustahili G, Tani K, Mushi HP, Baynes C, Ramsey K, Hingora A, Phillips JF. Role of condom negotiation on condom use among women of reproductive age in three districts in Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1097.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Exavery A, Kanté AM, Tani K, Hingora A, Phillips JF. Socio-demographic drivers of multiple sexual partnerships among women in three rural districts of Tanzania. HIV AIDS (Auckland). 2015;7:105–13.Google Scholar
  47. IPSOS (2013). Kenya coast survey: development, marginalization, security and participation.Google Scholar
  48. Korir W. An analysis of drug abuse along the coastal region of Kenya. Int NGO J. 2013;8(7):153–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Tegang SP, Abdallah S, Emukule G, Luchters S, Kingola N, Barasa M, Mucheke S, Mwarogo P. Concurrent sexual and substance-use risk behaviours among female sex workers in Kenya’s Coast Province: findings from a behavioural monitoring survey. SAHARA J. 2010;7(4):10–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Debeck K, Wood E, Qi J, Fu E, McArthur D, Montaner J, Kerr T. Interest in low-threshold employment among people who inject illicit drugs: implications for street disorder. Int J Drug Policy. 2011;22:376–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Reyes-Urueña J, Brugal MT, Majo X, Domingo-Salvany A, Caylà JA. Cross sectional study of factors associated to self-reported blood-borne infections among drug users. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1122.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Gibson DR, Zhang G, Cassady D, Pappas L, Mitchell J, Kegeles SM. Effectiveness of HIV prevention social marketing with injection drug users. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:1828–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Watson CA, Weng CX, French T, Anderson BJ, Nemeth C, McNutt LA, Smith LC. Substance abuse treatment utilization, HIV risk behaviors, and recruitment among suburban injection drug users in Long Island. New York: AIDS and behavior; 2013.Google Scholar
  54. Marston M, Slaymaker E, Cremin I, et al. Trends in marriage and time spent single in sub-Saharan Africa: a comparative analysis of six population-based cohort studies and nine demographic and health surveys. Sex Transm Infect. 2009;85:64–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Abdala N, White E, Toussova OV, Krasnoselskikh TV, Verevochkin S, Kozlov AP, Heimer R. Comparing sexual risks and patterns of alcohol and drug use between injection drug users (IDUs) and non-IDUs who report sexual partnerships with IDUs in St. Petersburg, Russia. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:676.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Needle R, Kroeger K, Belani H, Achrekar A, Parry CD, Dewing S. Sex, drugs, and HIV: rapid assessment of HIV risk behaviors among street-based drug using sex workers in Durban, South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:1447–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Mayhew S, Collumbien M, Qureshi A, Platt L, Rafiq N, Faisel A, Lalji N, Hawkes S. Protecting the unprotected: mixed-method research on drug use, sex work and rights in Pakistan's fight against HIV/AIDS. Sex Transm Infect. 2009;85(2):31–6.Google Scholar
  58. Zhu B, Bu J, Huang P, Zhou Z, Yin Y, Chen X, Wei W, Zhong M, Wang H, Wang H, Gan Q. Epidemiology of sexually transmitted infections, HIV, and related high-risk behaviors among female sex Workers in Guangxi Autonomous Region, China. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2012;65:75–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Salehi A, Naghshvarian M, Marzban M, Bagheri Lankarani K. Prevalence of HIV, HCV, and high-risk behaviors for substance users in drop in centers in southern Iran. J Addict Med. 2015;9:181–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Santos Cruz M, Andrade T, Bastos FI, Leal E, Bertoni N, Lipman L, Burnett C, Benedikt F. Patterns, determinants and barriers of health and social service utilization among young urban crack users in Brazil. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:536.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement