Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Risk factors for first-time acute myocardial infarction patients in Trinidad

BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201818:161

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5080-y

  • Received: 27 June 2017
  • Accepted: 15 January 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

The relative importance of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk varies globally. The aim of this study was to determine CAD risk factors for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) among patients in public health care institutions in Trinidad using a case–control type study design.

Methods

The sample comprised 251 AMI patients hospitalized between March 1, 2011 and April 30, 2012 and 464 age- and sex-matched non-AMI patients with no terminal or life-threatening illness and who did not undergo treatment for CAD. SPSS version 19 was used for data analysis that included chi-square tests, unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and conditional multiple binary logistic regression.

Results

There was no difference in age between AMI and non-AMI patients (p = 0.551). Chi-square test revealed that clinical and lifestyle variables including stressful life, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, ischaemic heart disease (IHD), a family history of IHD (p ≤ 0.001), smoking (p = 0.007) and alcohol consumption (p = 0.013) were associated with AMI; sex (p = 0.441), ethnicity (p = 0.366), age group (p = 0.826) and renal failure (p = 0.487) were not.

Both unadjusted and adjusted (for age) ORs showed that the odds of hypertension, IHD and alcohol consumption were greater among AMI patients than among non-AMI patients for males; diabetes and IHD for females; and that the odds of a stressful life was greater among non-AMI patients and were the same for both groups with respect to sex, age > 45 years, hypercholesterolemia, renal insufficiency, and family history of IHD.

Conditional multiple logistic regression showed that smoking [OR: 0.274, p ≤ 0.001, 95% CI for OR (0.140, 0.537)], a stressful life [OR: 2.697, p ≤ 0.001, 95% CI for OR (1.585, 4.587)], diabetes [OR: 0.530, p = 0.020, 95% CI for OR (0.310, 0.905)], hypertension [OR: 0.48, p = 0.10. 95% CI for OR (0.275, 0.837)] and IHD [OR: 0.111, p ≤ 0.001, 95% CI for OR (0.057, 0.218)] were the only useful AMI predictors.

Conclusions

Smoking, diabetes, hypertension, IHD and decrease stress are useful AMI predictors.

Keywords

  • Risk factors
  • Trinidad
  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • Case–control study

Background

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide [1]. The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD), a major contributor to CVD, is related to the increasing prevalence of modifiable risk factors [2]. Previous studies identified diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity and sedentary lifestyle [3, 4] as risk factors. Other risk factors identified were waist-to-hip ratio, dietary patterns, physical inactivity, blood apolipoproteins, psychosocial factors [5], loneliness and social isolation [6] and C-reactive protein [7], uric acid [8] and homocysteine levels [9]. However, certain risk factors may predominate in certain regions. Smoking is the main determinant of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) amongst the East Indians of Bangalore, India [10] and populations of certain Arab countries [11]. A study conducted in 2016 on Afro-Caribbean persons revealed that the genetic burden for coronary artery disease (CAD) identified on the basis of the 19-single-nucleotide polymorphisms genetic risk score was significantly lower in Afro-Caribbean individuals than in whites [12]. In Trinidad, it has been reported that East Indians are also thought to be at higher risk of CAD by virtue of ‘the migrant gene’ [13, 14]. The present study aimed to compare the association of selected CAD risk factors with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients and non-AMI patients using a case–control study design in which patients were matched on the basis of age and sex.

Methods

This study was a retrospective, observational, case–control study. The case population included all first-time AMI patients (cases) and the control population included non-AMI patients from the same hospital as the cases.

Cases: Patients with a discharge diagnosis of AMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction between 1 March 2011 and 30 April 2012 were identified from the ward registration book. From 2011, AMI patients had additional information documented in an AMI questionnaire used for epidemiological data collection. Case notes of these patients were then reviewed. Confirmed AMI cases, based on the detection of an increase and/or decrease in cardiac biomarkers with evidence of ischaemia with at least one symptom of ischaemia and electrocardiographic changes (new ST-T changes, left bundle branch block or pathological Q waves) [15] were selected for further data extraction. The cardiac biomarker used for confirmation of AMI was Troponin T.

Controls: A convenience sample of non-AMI patients (controls) was selected from among patients admitted in the orthopaedic, surgical, gynaecological and other wards and without a history of treated IHD. Inclusion criteria for non-AMI patients or controls were hospitalization for a problem other than IHD. Exclusion criteria were cases with terminal diseases or major health issues such as end-stage renal disease, human immune deficiency virus infection or cancer. Previous studies [1618] showed that cases were matched with controls by age and sex. In the present study, AMI patients were matched with either one or two controls by age (± 5 years), as in previous studies [5, 16, 1921] and sex.

Setting and sample size

The target population was all adults treated at public hospitals in each of the five regional health authorities (RHAs) in Trinidad and Tobago at the time of the study. The sampled population consisted of adult inpatients at the San Fernando General Hospital during the study period. This hospital accounts for approximately 35% of all hospital admissions in Trinidad and Tobago, and it was selected because ethical approval is granted by this institution.

The required sample size was 524, specifically comprising 262 AMI patients and 262 unmatched non-AMI patients. This sample size was based on an anticipated odds ratio (OR) of 2.0, a 95% confidence level, a relative precision of 50% and an assumption of a 5% probability of exposure to any of the risk factors examined in the study among non-AMI patients. Because the study sought to obtain two matching controls for each AMI patient, the required sample size was found to be 776 or 252 patients and 524 controls [22].

The data collection instrument was an 80-item questionnaire which was administered by trained data collectors (pre-medical students), and face-to-face interviews were conducted for non-AMI patients. The questionnaire comprised questions on type of AMI, timings, patient profile, medical history, social and family history and other clinical information. This is similar to the questionnaire used to extract data from AMI cases. Variables of interest in the study included selected socio-demographics (age, sex, highest level of education and annual income). Lifestyle and clinical variables included self-claimed smoking habit (currently continuing to smoke i.e. up to the year in which interview was conducted) and self-perceived stress (difficulty with coping and anxiousness); family history of IHD (first degree relatives such as siblings and parents usually aged < 50 years [females] or < 55 years [males]) and presence of diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, pre-existing IHD and renal insufficiency.

Statistical analysis

Microsoft Excel was used to create the database and Version 19 of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS), Version 19.0 for Windows (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Both descriptive and inferential data analysis methods were used. Descriptive methods included frequency tables, bar charts for display of age categories and summary statistics (means and standard deviations). Inferential methods included forming 95% confidence intervals for ORs, tests of equality of proportions, chi-square tests of association and conditional logistic regression.

Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Ethics Committee, South West Regional Health Authority and the University of the West Indies.

Results

Demographics

By the end of the data collection period, 715 of the 786 patients or 91.0% were accepted. Corresponding rates among AMI and non-AMI patients were as follows: 98.7% (251/262) among cases and 88.5% (464/524) among controls. Response rates between AMI and non-AMI patients did not differ significantly among age groups (Fig. 1) or between males and females as well as among ethnic groups. Table 1 shows sex, ethnicity and age group frequency distribution of patients by AMI status. Respondents were primarily males (AMI: 55.0%; non-AMI: 54.1%; overall: 54.4%) and Indo-Trinidadians (AMI: 82.1%; non-AMI: 83.4%; overall: 82.9%) and were aged > 45 years (AMI: 72.5%; non-AMI: 80.6%; overall: 81.2%). The overall mean age of all patients was 59.9 years (standard deviation: 12.07); 60.7 years (standard deviation: 12.66 years) for AMI and 57.4 years (standard deviation: 12.37 years) for non-AMI patients. The difference in the mean age between AMI and non-AMI patients was not statistically significant (p = 0.809).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Percentage age group distribution of respondents by patient status

IHD, ischaemic heart disease

Table 1

Frequency and percentage distribution of age and ethnicity of the respondents

 

Category: n (%)

 

Variable

Cases (AMI)

Control (non-AMI)

p value

(n = 251)

(n = 464)

Sex

 Male

138 (55.0)

251 (54.1)

0.875

 Female

113 (45.0)

231 (45.9)

0.24

Ethnicity

 Indo-Trinidadian

206 (82.1)

386 (83.4)

0.708

 Afro-Trinidadian

45 (17.9)

77 (16.6)

0.654

Age

 20–35

7 (2.8)

15 (3.2)

0.738

 36–49

37 (14.7)

75 (16.2)

0.613

 50–65

110 (43.8)

211 (45.5)

0.694

 65–75

68 (27.1)

121 (26.1)

0.79

  > 75

29 (11.6)

42 (9.1)

0.296

The prevalence of selected clinical and lifestyle variables was higher among AMI patients, except for smoking and renal insufficiency for which the prevalence was the same for both groups; in contrast, the prevalence of stressful life was greater among non-AMI patients (Table 2).
Table 2

Prevalence of clinical and lifestyle-related risk factors among patients by AMI status

Risk Factor

Cases (AMI)

Control (non-AMI)

p-value

n (%)

n (%)

Hypertension

185 (74.3)

222 (50.1)

≤ 0.001

Diabetes

158 (63.7)

170 (38.0)

≤ 0.001

IHD

109 (44.1)

27 (8.2)

≤ 0.001

Stressful life

63 (36.6)

231 (56.6)

≤ 0.001

Hypercholesterolemia

49 (19.7)

116 (35.9)

≤ 0.001

FH of IHD

76 (30.3)

13 (2.8)

≤ 0.001

Smoking

85 (34.0)

116 (25.0)

0.050

Alcohol use

81 (32.2)

112 (24.1)

0.019

Renal insufficiency

29 (12.3)

40 (11.9)

0.875

Association with cardiovascular risks

Table 3 shows p values for tests of the association between ethnicity, sex and age of ≥ 45 years and clinical and lifestyle among AMI and non-AMI patients. Among AMI patients, none of the clinical variables was associated with ethnicity. However, among the non-AMI patients, ethnicity was associated with diabetes (p = 0.003) and hypercholesterolaemia (p = 0.002). Diabetes (p = 0.001), hypertension (p ≤ 0.001), IHD (p = 0.042), smoking (p ≤ 0.001) and alcohol consumption (p ≤ 0.001) were associated with the sex of AMI patients; stressful life (p = 0.005), hypertension (p = 0.005), hypercholesterolaemia (p = 0.005), smoking (p ≤ 0.001) and alcohol consumption (p ≤ 0.001) were associated with the sex of the non-AMI patients. Moreover, age of > 45 years was associated with diabetes (p = 0.005), hypertension (p ≤ 0.001), smoking (p = 0.034) and alcohol consumption (p ≤ 0.033) among AMI patients, and with diabetes (p ≤ 0.001), hypertension (p ≤ 0.001), hypercholesterolaemia (p ≤ 0.023) and alcohol consumption (p ≤ 025) among non-AMI patient.
Table 3

The p values for tests of the association with ethnicity, sex and age > 45 years

 

Ethnicity

Sex

Age > 45 years

Variable

Cases

Controls

Cases

Controls

Cases

Controls

Non-modifiable risk factors

 Family history of IHD

0.347

0.380

0.828

0.560

0.512

0.151

Modifiable risk factors

Chronic disease

  Diabetes

0.110

0.003

0.001

0.061

0.010

0.001

  Hypertension

0.196

0.163

≤ 0.001

0.005

≤ 0.001

≤ 0.001

  Hypercholesterolaemia

0.110

0.002

0.061

0.005

0.940

0.023

  IHD

0.776

0.338

0.042

0.622

0.276

0.569

  Renal insufficiency

0.875

0.301

0.714

0.210

0.283

0.331

Lifestyle

  Smoking

0.077

0.801

≤ 0.001

≤ 0.001

0.016

0.083

  Alcohol consumption

0.603

0.105

≤ 0.001

≤ 0.001

0.033

0.025

Psychosocial stress

  Stressful life

0.79

0.507

0.085

≤ 0.001

0.062

0.138

Chi-square tests for the association between demographic, clinical and lifestyle variables and AMI revealed that AMI was not associated with sex, ethnicity or renal insufficiency (Table 4).
Table 4

Chi-square values, degrees of freedom and p values for testing association with AMI

Variable

χ 2

df

p value

Demographic variables

 Sex

0.051

1

0.441

 Age

1.504

4

0.826

 Age > 45 years

3.626

1

0.035

 Ethnicity

0.193

1

0.366

 Family history of IHD

112.844

1

≤ 0.001

Clinical conditions

Chronic disease

  Diabetes

42.203

1

≤ 0.001

  Hypertension

38.489

1

≤ 0.001

  Hypercholesterolaemia

19.760

1

≤ 0.001

  IHD

101.333

1

≤ 0.001

  Renal insufficiency

0.025

1

0.487

Lifestyle

  Smoking

6.510

1

0.007

  Alcohol consumption

5.467

1

0.013

Psychosocial stress

  Stressful life

19.343

1

≤ 0.001

Unadjusted and adjusted ORs for age among males and females

Tables 5 and 6 show unadjusted and adjusted ORs, respectively. As seen among all male patients, the odds of hypertension, IHD and alcohol consumption were greater among AMI patients than among non-AMI patients. Among females controlled for age the odds of diabetes mellitus and IHD was higher among AMI cases, and that the odds of reporting to have a stressful life was greater among non-AMI female patients but were the same in both groups for patients aged ≥45 years, regardless of sex, and for patients with at least one of the following diseases or lifestyle habits: hypercholesterolaemia, renal insufficiency, and a family history of IHD.
Table 5

Unadjusted and adjusted (for age) odds ratios for male patients

 

Odds ratios (Unadjusted)

Odds ratios (Adjusted for age)

Variable

OR (95% CI for OR)

p value

OR (95% CI for OR)

p value

Non-modifiable risk factors

 Family history of IHD

2.2 × 109 (0.00, −)

0.997

2.2 × 109(0.00, −)

0.997

 Age > 45 years

1.983 (0.635–6.193)

0.239

2.561 (0.593–11.057)

0.208

Modifiable risk factors

Chronic disease

  Diabetes

1.089 (0.496–2.388)

0.832

1.085 (0.494–2.386)

0.829

  Hypertension

2.244 (1.011–4.979)

0.047

2.318 (1.033–5.200)

0.041

  Hypercholesterolaemia

0.746 (0.289–1.923)

0.544

0.732 (0.278–1.885)

0.508

  IHD

7.153 (2.668–19.179)

≤ 0.001

7.275 (2.700–19.601)

≤ 0.001

  Renal insufficiency

0.503 (0.154–1.642)

0.255

0.516 (0.158–1.686)

0.273

Lifestyle

  Smoking

2.246 (0.986–5.116)

0.054

2.208 (0.970–5.030)

 

  Alcohol consumption

2.589 (1.176–5.700)

0.018

2.421 (0.398–3.642)

0.035

Psychosocial stress

  Stressful life

0.935 (0.432–2.207)

0.866

0.906 (0.415–1.961)

0.805

Table 6

Unadjusted and adjusted (for age) odds ratios for female patients

 

Unadjusted Odds

Adjusted (for age) Odds

Variable

OR (95% CI for OR)

P value

OR (95% CI for OR)

p value

Non-modifiable risk factors

 Family history of IHD

4.7 × 109 (0.000, −)

0.997

24.7 × 109 (0.00, −)

0.997

 Age > 45 years

0.040 (0.003, 0.511)

0.013

0.040 (0.00, 0.681)

0.026

Modifiable risk factors

Chronic disease

  Diabetes

4.429 (1.292, 15.182)

0.018

4.436 (1.284, 15.331)

0.019

  Hypertension

1.762 (0.491, 6.331)

0.385

1.767 (0.484, 6.454)

0.389

  Hypercholesterolaemia

0.383 (0.100, 1.460)

0.16

0.381 (0.096, 1.510)

0.17

  IHD

8.103 (1.523, 26.001)

0.002

8.121 (2.137, 30.855)

0.002

  Renal insufficiency

1.463 (0.297, 7.211)

0.64

1.463 (0.297, 7.215)

0.64

Lifestyle

  Smoking

3.467 (0.385, 31.245)

0.268

3.451 (0.369, 32.279)

0.278

  Alcohol consumption

0.714 (0.109, 4.684)

0.725

0.710 (0.104, 4.866)

0.728

Psychosocial stress

  Stressful life

0.163 (0.052, 0.516)

0.002

0.163 (0.051, 0.520)

0.002

Predictors

Finally conditional multiple logistic regression showed that smoking [OR: 0.274, p ≤ 0.001, 95% CI for OR (0.140, 0.537)], a stressful life [OR: 2.697, p ≤ 0.001, 95% CI for OR (1.585, 4.587)], diabetes [OR: 0.530, p = 0.020, 95% CI for OR (0.310, 0.905)], hypertension [OR: 0.48, p = 0.10. 95% CI for OR (0.275, 0.837)] and IHD [OR: 0.111, p ≤ 0.001, 95% CI for OR (0.057, 0.218)] were the only useful predictors of AMI (Table 7).
Table 7

Binary logistic regression (Coefficients and odds ratios)a

  

OR

p value

95% Confidence Interval for OR

Regression coefficients

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Age > 45

− 0.009

0.991

0.434

0.968

1.014

Sex

0.139

1.149

0.655

0.625

2.115

Stressful life

0.992

2.697

≤ 0.001

1.585

4.587

Diabetes

− 0.636

0.530

0.020

0.310

0.905

Hypertension

− 0.734

0.480

0.010

0.275

0.837

Hypercholesterolaemia

0.319

1.375

0.300

0.753

2.513

Ischemic heart disease

−2.196

0.111

≤ 0.001

0.057

0.218

Smoking

−1.294

0.274

≤ 0.001

0.140

0.537

Alcohol consumption

− 0.580

0.560

0.066

0.301

1.040

Model

Likelihood Ratio Tests

bAIC

−2 log likelihood

chi-Square

df

P value

Intercept only

478.539

476.539

   

Final

368.224

348.224

128.315

9

≤ 0.001

McFadden R2 = 0.262

aAll references values were 0 representing the absence of the condition

bAkaike information criterion

Discussion

Traditional risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of IHD, family history of IHD, smoking and alcohol consumption, but not stress and hypercholesterolaemia, were associated with AMI. These risk factors were also identified in the Framingham Heart study [3] and the INTERHEART  study [23]. Stress [24] and hypercholesterolaemia [25] have been identified as risk factors in other studies. However, in the present study, these two common risk factors were more prevalent among non-AMI patients. This may have been related to the patients’ unclear understanding and lack of uniformity among patients’ understanding of hypercholesterolaemia confirmation. The lack of an association, though, has also been noted in other studies. Quintana et al. found that hyperlipidaemia was not associated with myocardial infarction-related fatality. [26] In a study conducted by Goldfeld et al., patients with cardiac symptoms without overt CAD showed similar depression and/or stress levels as post-myocardial infarction patients [27]. Hypercholesterolaemia is still a cause of concern since it is related to dietary patterns and type of food consumption [28]. Clusters of risk factors for CAD have been identified in numerous studies in Trinidad. Thomas et al. revealed that diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cigarette smoking were prevalent among patients presenting with AMI [29]. Mungrue et al. identified smoking and BMI as predictors of AMI-related death or survival [30]. Smoking was associated with a 1.6-times higher risk for AMI and BMI with a 1.3-times higher risk [30]. Alfred et al. found the most common risks associated with AMI in Tobago to be dyslipidaemia, hypertension and diabetes mellitus [31]. None of the local studies were case–control studies. Smoking, diabetes, hypertension and history of CAD were found to be the most common cardiovascular risk factors in Libya [32], and smoking and a family history of CAD were the common ones in Pakistan [33]. In a study on the epidemiology of myocardial infarction, associated risk factors for AMI mortality included age of > 84 years, female sex, educational level and smoking [34].

Subgroup (ethnicity, sex and age) association with cardiovascular risks in our study revealed inconsistent results with AMI and non-AMI cases. However, this study found no difference in the association between ethnicity and AMI status. Ethnic differences in risk factors have been reported by several studies such as those conducted in Singapore and in the UK [35, 36]. Indo-Trinidadians are reportedly at higher risk for CAD than the Indo-British [37]. Ethnic differences in the incidence of AMI may result from factors that were not tested such as high sugar intake, dysfunctional eating, increased waist-to-hip ratio and psychosocial stress although such differences may be less significant owing to the narrowing of lifestyle and cultural differences between the two major ethnic groups in Trinidad and Tobago.

Young patients with AMI demonstrated the additional risk factor of smoking as opposed to their age-matched controls. Among the adults aged < 45 years, the most significant lifestyle-related risk factor was smoking, which is preventable. While age is a non-modifiable risk factor for CAD, there is an increasing young population that suffers from this condition. In this study, the adults aged < 45 years accounted for 8.2% of the patients with AMI, similar to 4 to 10% reported by Harvard Medical School [38]. Those aged < 50 years accounted for 15.3% of the AMI cases. This observation is significant because this signals a possible loss of many years of productive life [39] in addition to the social [40], psychological [41] and physical trauma the patients and their close relatives and dependents experience [42], as well as the economic burden imposed [43].

When the data were analysed according to sex, it was found that diabetes, hypertension, smoking and alcohol consumption were significantly associated with AMI cases. However, stressful life, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia and smoking showed significant associations among controls. This is in contrast to the findings of Kawano et al. who found that hypercholesterolaemia is an independent risk factor for AMI in men but not in women [44].

Controlling for age, among males, the unadjusted and adjusted OR was higher for hypertension, alcohol and a history of IHD while for females the OR for diabetes mellitus and IHD was higher than non-AMIs. In addition, the odds of reporting a stressful life were greater among non-AMI female patients. A case–control study based on the results of the INTERHEART study showed that hypertension, diabetes, physical activity and moderate alcohol consumption were more strongly associated with myocardial infarction among women than among men [23].

In our study, the predictors for AMI obtained from conditional multiple logistic regression revealed that smoking [OR: 0.274, p ≤ 0.001], stressful life [OR: 2.697, p ≤ 0.001], diabetes [OR: 0.530, p = 0.020], hypertension [OR: 0.48, p = 0.10] and IHD [OR: 0.111, p ≤ 0.001] were the only useful predictors of AMI. Wilson et al. showed similar predictors diabetes, hypertension, and IHD of AMI [45] in addition to hypercholesterolaemia. In this study, the only modifiable predictable lifestyle factor was smoking. Smoking has become a major public health problem in Trinidad and Tobago. Among the AMI patients aged < 50 years who experienced AMI, 25.5% did not smoke, whereas 31.8% smoked. According to the British-based ERC research firm, over the past 22 years, Trinidad and Tobago has been ranked ninth among the top 10 countries that have recorded the largest percentage increase in cigarette consumption and continues to show an upward trend [46].

Limitations

The limitations of the study are the small sample size and missing data from patient records. There is an absence of data on dietary intake, including added sugar content, and on psychosocial factors. Information on self-claimed stress and smoking may not meet objective assessment tool or scientific criteria. Patient recall of information can be a problem. Certain risk factors such as obesity could not be obtained because of inadequate information in patient records. Information on hypercholesterolaemia may be questionable because people equate taking lipid-lowering drugs with suffering from hyperlipidaemia or not suffering from the condition if they are not taking lipid lowering therapy.

Conclusions

Hypertension, diabetes, history of IHD, family history of IHD, smoking and alcohol consumption are associated with CAD. However, the predictors of AMI identified were smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, a history of IHD and decreased stressful lifestyle. There were no significant differences in risk factors between Indo- and Afro-Trinidadians. Effort must be aimed at decreasing lifestyle risks (smoking) and chronic disease risks (diabetes and hypertension) at both the public health and primary care level to curb this epidemic [47]. Early identification of modifiable risk factors is vital to set the strategy for prevention [11]. However, special attention must be paid to smoking, particularly in young individuals.

Abbreviations

AMI: 

Acute myocardial infarction

BMI: 

Basal metabolic index

CAD: 

Coronary artery disease

CI: 

Confidence interval

CVD: 

Cardiovascular disease

IHD: 

Ischaemic heart disease

OR: 

Odds ratio

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the pre-medical students who assisted in the data collection.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on request.

Authors’ contributions

MB designed the study, collected and supervised data collection and wrote and edited the manuscript. TS supervised and edited the manuscript. GL assisted in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

MB is a Specialist Medical Officer and lecturer at the School of Medicine of the University of the West Indies (Mt Hope, Trinidad and Tobago). TS is a lecturer at the University of the West Indies. GL is a lecturer in statistics at the University of the West Indies (St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of South–West Regional Health Authority and the University of the West Indies.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, Mt. Hope, Trinidad, Trinidad and Tobago
(2)
Trinidad, Trinidad and Tobago

References

  1. Gersh BJ, Sliwa K, Mayosi BM, Yusuf S. Novel therapeutic concepts: the epidemic of cardiovascular disease in the developing world: global implications. European Heart J. 2010;31:642–8. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq030.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kreatsoulas C, Anand SS. The impact of social determinants on cardiovascular disease. Can J Cardiol. 2010;26(Suppl C):8C–13C.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Mahmood SS, Levy D, Vasan RS, Wang TJ. The Framingham heart study and the epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases: a historical perspective. Lancet. 2014;383(9921):999–1008. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61752-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ryoo JH, Cho SH, Kim SW. Prediction of risk factors for coronary heart disease using Framingham risk score in Korean men. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45030. 10.1371/journal.pone.0045030.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): a case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):937–52. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S, Ronzi S, Hanratty B. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies. Heart. 2016;102(13):1009–16. 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308790.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Auer J, Berent R, Lassnig E, Eber B. C-reactive protein and coronary artery disease. Jpn Heart J. 2002;43(6):607–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sinan Deveci O, Kabakci G, Okutucu S, Tulumen E, Aksoy H, Baris Kaya E, et al. The association between serum uric acid level and coronary artery disease. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64(7):900–7. 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02263.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kazemi MB, Eshraghian K, Omrani GR, Lankarani KB, Hosseini E. Homocysteine level and coronary artery disease. Angiology. 2006;57(1):9–14. 10.1177/000331970605700102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Krishnan MN. Coronary heart disease and risk factors in India – on the brink of an epidemic? Indian Heart J. 2012;64(4):364–7. 10.1016/j.ihj.2012.07.001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. El-Menyar A, Zubaid M, Shehab A, Bulbanat B, AlBustani N, Alenezi F, et al. Prevalence and impact of cardiovascular risk factors among patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome in the Middle East. Clin Cardiol. 2011;34(1):51–8. 10.1002/clc.20873..View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Larifla L, Beaney KE, Foucan L, Bangou J, Michel JA, Martino J, et al. Influence of genetic risk factors on coronary heart disease occurrence in Afro-Caribbeans. Can J Cardiol. 2016:978–5. 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.004.
  13. Misra R. Immigrant Asian Indians in the U.S.: a population at risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Spring. 2009;41(1) http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ865578.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2016.
  14. Forouhi NG, Sattar N. CVD risk factors and ethnicity—a homogeneous relationship? Atheroscler Suppl. 2006;7(1):11–9. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2006.01.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(22):2173–95. https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/18036459. Accessed 18 Jan 2018.
  16. Gupta R, Kishore J, Bansal Y, Daga MK, Jiloha RC, Singal R, et al. Relationship of psychosocial risk factors, certain personality traits and myocardial infarction in Indians: a case-control study. Indian J Community Med. 2011;36(3):182–6. 10.4103/0970-0218.86517.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Shrikhande SN, Zodpey SP, Negandhi H. A case-control study examining association between infectious agents and acute myocardial infarction. Indian J Public Health. 2014;58(2):106–9. 10.4103/0019-557X.132285.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Du H, Dong CY, Lin QY. Risk factors of acute myocardial infarction in middle-aged and adolescent people (< 45 years) in Yantai. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:106. 10.1186/s12872-015-0102-5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Thalib L, Zubaid M, Suresh CG, Rashed W, Shukkur M. Diabetes mellitus as a contributor to the in-hospital mortality after acute myocardial infarction in Kuwait. Acta Cardiol. 2004;59(3):317–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Al-Motarreb A, Briancon S, Al-Jaber N, Al-Adhi B, Al-Jailani F, Salek MS, et al. Khat chewing is a risk factor for acute myocardial infarction: a case-control study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;59(5):574–81. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02358.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Zodpey SP, Shrikhande SN, Negandhi HN, Ughade SN, Joshi PP. Risk factors for acute myocardial infarction in central India: a case-control study. Indian J Community Med. 2015;40(1):19–26. 10.4103/0970-0218.149265.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Kevin M. Sullivan a. OpenEpi. Sample Size for Unmatched Case-Control Studies [Internet]. Openepi.com. Available from: openepi.com/SampleSize/SSCC.htm. Accessed 4 Dec 2017.
  23. Anand SS, Islam S, Rosengren A, Franzosi G, Steyn K, Yusufali AH, et al. Risk factors for myocardial infarction in women and men: insights from the INTERHEART study. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:932–40. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn074.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Vujcic I, Vlajinac H, Dubljanin E, Vasiljevic Z, Matanovic D, Maksimovic J, et al. Psychosocial stress and risk of myocardial infarction: a case-control study in Belgrade (Serbia). Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016;32:281–9. 10.6515/ACS20150424K.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. The Fukuoka Heart Study Group. Medication for hypercholesterolemia and the risk of nonfatal acute myocardial infarction: a case-control study in Japan. Circ J. 2002;66:463–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Quintana HK, Janszky I, Gigante B, Druid H, Ahlbom A, Hallqvist J, et al. Diabetes, hypertension, overweight and hyperlipidaemia and 7-day case-fatality in first myocardial infarction. IJC Metab Endocr. 2016;12:30–5. 10.1016/j.ijcme.2016.05.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldfeld PRM, Soares LS, Manfroi WC. Association of depression and stress in acute myocardial infarction: a case-control study. Rev Fac Med. 2015;63(3):439–48. 10.15446/revfacmed.v63n3.50860.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Na L, Han T, Zhang W, Wu X, Na G, Du S, et al. A snack dietary pattern increases the risk of hypercholesterolemia in northern Chinese adults: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134294. 10.1371/journal.pone.0134294.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Thomas CN, Titus G, Williams D, Simeon D, Pitt-Miller P. Two-year mortality and its determinants following acute myocardial infarction in Trinidad and Tobago. West Indian Med J. 2000;49(2):112–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mungrue K, Mootoosingh C, Ramsingh S. Epidemiology, risk analysis and clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in Trinidad. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2011;11(3):267–70. 10.5152/akd.2011.064.Google Scholar
  31. Alfred R, Okeke O, Moronu C, Elliot V, Frankson A, Barton EN. Descriptive epidemiology of cases of acute myocardial infarction in Tobago. West Indian Med J. 2009;58(3):257–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Abduelkarem AR, El-Shareif HJ, Sharif SI. Evaluation of risk factors in acute myocardial infarction patients admitted to the coronary care unit, Tripoli Medical Centre. Libya East Mediterr Health J. 2012;18(4):332–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Safdar MHK, Fazal I, Ejaz A, Awan ZI. Risk profile in young patients with acute myocardial infarction. PAFMJ. 2010;60(2):212–6. ISSN:0030-9648.Google Scholar
  34. Ahmadi A, Soori H, Mehrabi Y, Etemad K, Khaledifar A. Epidemiological pattern of myocardial infarction and modelling risk factors relevant to in-hospital mortality: the first results from the Iranian myocardial infarction registry. Kardiol Pol. 2015;73(6):451–7. https://doi.org/10.5603/KP.a2014.0230. Epub 2014 Nov 27. Available from: https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/25428813. [Accessed 2 December 2017]. View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mak KH, Chia KS, Kark JD, ChuaT TC, Foong BH, et al. Ethnic differences in acute myocardial infarction in Singapore. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(2):151–60. 10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00423-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Bansal N, Fischbacher CM, Bhopal RS, Brown H, Steiner MF, Capewell S. Myocardial infarction incidence and survival by ethnic group: Scottish health and ethnicity linkage retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(9):e003415. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003415.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Shaukat N, de Bono DP. Are indo-origin people essentially susceptible to coronary artery disease? Postgrad Med J. 1994;70:315–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. American Heart Association. National health and nutrition examination survery. 2015. https://www.heart.org/idc/groups/heart-public/@wcm/@sop/@smd/documents/downloadable/ucm_449846.pdf.
  39. Bucholz EM, Normand S-LT, Wang Y, Ma S, Lin H, Krumholz HM. Life expectancy and years of potential life lost after acute myocardial infarction by sex and race; a cohort-based study of medicare beneficiaries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(6):645–55. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.022.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Skeptical Scalpel. CME: Social support after acute myocardial infarction. AKH CME; Cardiology. 2015. http://www.physiciansweekly.com/cme-social-support-after-acute-myocardial-infarction/. Accessed 27 Mar 2017.
  41. Frasure-Smith N, Lespérance F. Depression and other psychological risks following myocardial infarction. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:627–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Garcia RP, Budó MLD, Simon BS, Wünsch S, Oliveira SG, Barbosa MS. Family experiences post-acute myocardial infarction. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2013;34(3):171–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Seo H, Yoon S-J, Yoon J, Kim D, Gong Y, Kim AR, et al. Recent trends in economic burden of acute myocardial infarction in South Korea. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117446. 10.1371/journal.pone.0117446.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Kawano H, Soejima H, Kojima S, Kitagawa A, Ogawa H. Japanese Acute Coronary Syndrome Study (JACSS) investigators. Sex differences of risk factors for acute myocardial infarction in Japanese patients. Circ J. 2006;70(5):513–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97:1837–47. 10.1161/01.CIR.97.18.1837.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Trinidad and Tobago’ smoking problem. Trinidad Express Newspapers. 2013. http://www.trinidadexpress.com/commentaries/Trinidad-and-Tobagos-smoking-problem-210167471.html. Accessed 06 May 2016.
  47. Taggart J, Williams A, Dennis S, Newall A, Shortus T, Zwar N, et al. A systematic review of interventions in primary care to improve health literacy for chronic disease behavioral risk factors. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13(49) 10.1186/1471-2296-13-49.

Copyright

Advertisement