Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Common risk indicators for oral diseases and obesity in 12-year-olds: a South Pacific cross sectional study

  • 1, 4,
  • 1, 2,
  • 2,
  • 3 and
  • 1, 4Email author
BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201818:112

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4996-y

  • Received: 15 September 2016
  • Accepted: 14 December 2017
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Despite the increasing need to prevent obesity and oral diseases in adolescents worldwide, few studies have investigated the link existing between these conditions and their common risk factors. This study aims to evaluate the oral health and weight status of New Caledonian Children (aged 6,9,12 years) and to identify, amongst 12-year-olds, risk indicators that may characterize the groups of children affected by oral diseases, obesity or both diseases.

Methods

This survey evaluated in 2011–2012 the oral health and stature-weight status and related risk indicators in a national representative sample of 6, 9 and 12 years-old children in New Caledonia. Dental status, chewing efficiency, height, weight and waist circumference were clinically recorded at school. The body mass index (BMI) and the waist to height ratio (WtHR) were calculated. For BMI the WHO Cut-offs were used. Twelve years-old participants responded to a questionnaire concerning socio-demographic and behavioural variables. For statistical analysis, the Clinical Oral and Global Health Index (COGHI) was developed and used. Twelve years-old children were categorised into four groups; Oral Diseases (ODG), Obesity (OG), Obesity and Oral Diseases (ODOG) and a Healthy Group (HG). A multivariate analysis was conducted using mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression models.

Results

Prevalence of overweight and obesity was greatly increasing from 6 years (respectively 10.8% [8.8;13.3] and 7.8% [6.0;9.9]) to 12 years (respectively 22.2% [19.9;24.7] and 20.5% [18.2;22.9]) and one third of the 12-yr-olds had an excess of abdominal adiposity. At age 12, 36.6% of the children were healthy (HG), 27.3% had oral diseases (ODG), 19.7% were obese (OG) and 16.5% had both conditions (ODOG). Geographical location, ethnicity, tooth-brushing frequency and masticatory disability were significant risk factors for the OG, ODOG and ODG groups. Ethnicity and masticatory impairment were common risk indicators for the association of oral diseases and obesity.

Conclusions

In NC health promotion programs should be specifically addressed towards Native populations who are particularly exposed to oral diseases and obesity, integrating a multiple risk factors approach, in order to prevent the onset of chronic diseases in adulthood. The impact of masticatory ability on children’s weight status is a major issue for future research.

Keywords

  • Children
  • Oral health
  • Mastication
  • Obesity
  • BMI
  • Waist-to-height ratio
  • Risk factors
  • Epidemiology

Background

Obesity or being overweight and oral diseases such as tooth decay are frequent chronic diseases, not only in disadvantaged groups in developed countries but also in developing countries [13]. Both of these conditions are linked to environmental determinants and behavioural risk factors, including some specific dietary habits (intake of sugar-sweetened drinks and frequency of food intake between meals), considered as common for both diseases [46]. Besides, it has recently been showed in children that oral diseases (dental caries and gingival inflammation) and tooth loss may cause masticatory dysfunction and thus nutritional problems [7, 8]. Children with missing or painful teeth may limit their food choices because of chewing problems, which results in lower health related quality of life and nutritionally inadequate diets [9]. On one hand, they might not get sufficient nutrition for normal growth leading to undernutrition. On the other hand, the limitation of food choices also may favour excessive intakes of highly processed high fat and high carbohydrate foods contributing to obesity and obesity related diseases. Until now, only a few studies have investigated the relationship between oral diseases and obesity and little interest has been shown in the study of risk factors common to both obesity and oral diseases [1014].

In French overseas territories such as New Caledonia, this question is of particular interest. Among children and young people, which often consume sugary drinks on a daily basis, oral diseases are frequent [15]. New Caledonia (pop. 268,800) is a French overseas territory with extensive administrative autonomy. The population is a mix of 39% Kanak people (the original inhabitants of New Caledonia), 27% White European people (Caledonians and Metropolitan Frenchmen), 10% Polynesian people (Wallisians essentially), South-East Asian people and people from Vanuatu. There is no available data on childhood obesity in NC, but 67% of adults, especially Polynesians, are overweight [16]. The mean income per inhabitant places New Caledonia within the richest countries of the South Pacific area but there are strong social and economic disparities within the population. There are also health disparities between the various NC ethnic groups, which make up the population, Natives (Kanak and Polynesian) being more affected by oral diseases and rheumatic heart disease, which are correlated with housing conditions [15, 17]. Since 2009, the New Caledonia health authorities and the political decision-makers have been developing health-promoting programs to raise awareness about oral health and to slow down the rise in obesity, particularly among children. This policy aims at preventing the occurrence of metabolic syndrome in teenagers and young adults.

In this context, the first aim of this study was thus to evaluate the prevalence of oral diseases, overweight and obesity in New Caledonian Children (aged 6, 9, 12 years) in order to evaluate the needs for a health promotion program. An ancillary study was further intended to identify individual or environmental risk indicators in NC 12-year-olds that could be common to the groups of children affected by oral diseases or obesity or both diseases. Moreover, it was decided to explore the specific role of masticatory dysfunction on the occurrence of both diseases.

Methods

This descriptive epidemiological survey evaluated the oral health, stature-weight status and related risk indicators in a national representative sample of 6, 9 and 12-year-old New Caledonian children during the school year 2011–2012.

Study population

The calculation of the sample size (n = 800 for age 6 and 9 children and 1200 for children aged 12) and the sampling method used in this survey (a computerised cluster sampling method with a probability proportional to size) have been described previously [15]. The pool of all the NC elementary and junior high schools was stratified according to the area (South/North/Island) and the type of school (public/private) and 76 schools (50 public and 26 private; 20 in the North region of the main island, 41 in South and 15 in the Islands) were selected. The sample thus included 3138 children (911 6-yr-olds, 923 9-yr-olds and 1304 12-yr-olds). The age group of 12 year olds was chosen to explore the association with risk indicators because it is, according to WHO, the global indicator age group for international comparisons and surveillance of oral disease trends.

Study variables and data collection

The study was conducted between July 2011 and September 2012 at school. In order to increase the participation rate and ensure the validity of the study, the time for each child’s evaluation (examination and questionnaire) was restricted. The number of questions was limited and simple answering options questions were preferred. Investigators’ calibration and data collection for oral diseases have been described in a previous paper and are summarised below [15]. Seven dentists evaluated the children’s oral status during a clinical examination. Assistants trained for the stature weight data collection accompanied the dentists. Dental caries was diagnosed at the dentinal level (D3) for deciduous and permanent teeth and the number of decayed, missing or filled teeth (DMFT, dft) were calculated [18]. The gingival status was evaluated with the Gingival Index of Loë & Silness and the children were classified in three groups: without gingivitis (score 0 for all sextants), with localised gingivitis (score > 0 in one group of teeth) or with generalised gingivitis (score > 0 for one or both arches) [19]. The presence of mucosal signs of an infectious process was also recorded. Chewing efficiency was evaluated by recording the number of posterior functional dental units (PFU) which has recently shown to impact the masticatory ability in children [7, 9]. The presence of severe oro-facial dysmorphology and the type of breathing (oral/ nasal/ mixed) were also recorded [20]. Prior to the start of the study, all the dentists underwent a two-day training course consisting of projection of pictures illustrating clinical situations and explaining the data collection process. Intra- and inter-examiner agreements were evaluated using Cohen’s Kappa and varied from 0.46 to 0.92 and from 0.69 to 1, depending on the clinical variables. Study variables are detailed in Table 1.
Table 1

List of the study variables

 

Description of the indicator

Socio-demographic variables

 Age (years)

(Date of examination- date of birth)/365.25

 Sex

Female/Male

 Region

Islands / North / South

 Type of school

Public/Private

 Cultural Ethnic group

Melanesian / Polynesian / New Caledonian / Others

Oral diseases (clinical evaluation)

 Gingivitis a

  No

Gingival index = 0 for both arches

  Localised

Gingival index > 0 in only one group of teeth

  Generalised

Gingival index > 0 for one or both arches

 Dental caries b

  No

untreated carious lesion

  At least one

untreated carious lesion

 Infectious dental process c

  No

infectious dental process

  At least one

infectious dental process

 Number of posterior functional units (PFU d)

PFU < 4

4 ≤ PFU < 6

PFU ≥ 6

 Severe oro-facial dysmorphologies e

None

One or more

 Type of breathing

Nasal breathing

Oral (or mixed) breathing

Stature weight status (clinical evaluation)

 Body mass index BMI

  Under-weight

BMI < -2SD

  Normal-weight

-2SD ≤ BMI ≤ 1SD

  Over-weight

BMI > 1SD

  Obesity

BMI > 2SD

 Waist to height ratio WtHr

 

  Normal

WtHr <0.5

  At risk

WtHr ≥0.5

Self-reported oral health and behaviours (questionnaire)

 Frequency of tooth brushing

Less than once a day

Once or several times a day

 Usual drink when thirsty

Water when thirsty

Sweet drinks when thirsty

 Has already smoked

No, has never smoked

Yes, has already smoked

 Lunch at school

No, the child has lunch at home

Yes, the child has lunch at school

 Experience with dental care

No, has never visited a dentist

Yes, has already visited a dentist

 Dental anxiety (VAS 0 to 10)

No or low anxiety (score ≤ 3)

Yes moderate to high anxiety (score > 3)

 Experience of recent dental pain

No

Yes

 Prevention at school

No experience

Already experienced

 Feel able to eat all kind of foods

No, problems in eating some kind of foods

Yes, able to eat all kind of food

a Løe and Silness index [19]

b Stage 3 or 4 of Ekstrand classification [18]

c Presence of an abscess, a cellulite, a tooth with pulpal exposure or a fistula

d Number of Pairs of posterior teeth with at least one contact area during chewing [7, 9]

e > 2 years from the normal age of eruption or dental overcrowding >4 mm from the occlusion plane, > 1 mm negative over-jet, > 6 mm positive over-jet, Unilateral or bilateral cross-bite and complete overbite, > 6 mm open overbite [20]

For measuring the stature weight status, assistants used tape measures and SECA® digital scales. Children wore light clothing but no shoes. The body mass index (BMI in Kg/m2) and the waist to height ratio (WtHR) were calculated. For each child, weight and height were collected and BMI-for-age Z-scores were calculated based on the updated WHO reference [21, 22]. Children with BMI Z-score between ≥ − 2 and ≤ + 1 were classified as normal weight; those with Z-score between > +1 and ≤ +2 were considered overweight; and those with Z-score > +2 as obese. The waist-height ratio (WHtR) was calculated by dividing the waist circumference by the height. A WtHR value of ≥0.5 was considered as a risk factor for metabolic syndrome [22, 23]. In order to allow comparisons with other epidemiological studies, the prevalence of overweight and obesity were also calculated using the international obesity task force (IOTF) definition [24].

Socio-demographic variables (gender, date of birth, area of residence, public or private school) were obtained from the school register. Moreover, children responded to a self-administered questionnaire on their behaviours (lunch at school/at home, frequency of tooth brushing, usual drink when thirsty, has already smoked/not), experience with dental care (already visited a dentist, level of dental anxiety, prevention made at school/not) and reported oral condition (recent experience of dental pain, self-perception of chewing ability). Finally, children were asked to which main cultural/ ethnic group (Kanak / Polynesian / Caledonian / European, Asian / Other) they felt they belonged to. In NC, ethnic characteristics are prominent compared with social and economic ones and ethnic statistics have been authorised, not the case in any other French territories.

Data analysis

Data entry was duplicated and errors were corrected. The statistical analyses were performed using Stata software (version 13, StataCorp, College Station TX, USA). Prevalence of oral diseases, abdominal and general over-weight and obesity were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to describe the Caledonian children’s health status. Mean DMFT, BMI and WtHr were calculated for all the children for whom all data were complete.

Then, for the 12-year-olds, indicators of oral and stature/weight status were associated to produce a new combined index which was built for the needs of the study: The Clinical Oral and Global Health Index (COGHI). An algorithm was applied using logical association (If/then/else) to categorise the children into four groups: the group with Oral Diseases (ODG), the Obesity group (OG, including obese children), the Obesity and Oral Diseases group (ODOG) and a Healthy control group (HG). Construction of the COGHI subgroups is detailed Table 2. A sensitivity analysis showed that excluding the underweight children from the COGHI groups, had no impact on the bivariate and multivariate analyses. Thus, children considered as underweight and children for whom all the health indicators were not available were excluded of the algorithm.
Table 2

Definition of the “Clinical Oral and Global Health Index” groups and proportion of 12-yr-olds children in each group

COGHI Groups

Criteria

Proportion of children (N = 1165)

Healthy group (HG)

36.6%

 No oral diseases

 Not obese

 

No untreated dental caries (D3T = 0)

and

No gingivitis (localised or generalised)

and

No mucosal sign of infection

and

Not obese (BMI ≤ 2 SD)

and

No risk for metabolic syndrome (WtHr < 0.5)

Oral Diseases group (ODG)

27.3%

 Oral diseases

 Not obese

 

At least one untreated carious lesion (D3T > 0)

or

Generalised gingivitis (Gingival index > 0 for one or both arches)

or

Mucosal sign(s) of infection

and

Not obese (BMI ≤ 2 SD)

and

No risk for metabolic syndrome (WtHr < 0.5)

Obesity group (OG)

19.7%

 Obese

 No oral diseases

 

Obesity (BMI > 2 SD)

or

Risk for metabolic syndrome (WtHr ≥ 0.5)

and

No untreated dental caries (D3T = 0)

and

No gingivitis (localised or generalised)

 

and

No mucosal sign of infection

Oral Diseases/Obesity group (ODOG)

16.5%

 Oral diseases

 Obese

 

At least one untreated carious lesion (D3T > 0)

or

Generalised gingivitis (Gingival index > 0 for one or both arches)

or

Mucosal sign(s) of infection

and

Obesity (BMI > 2 SD)

or

Risk for metabolic syndrome (WtHr ≥ 0.5)

The associations between oral diseases or obesity and explanatory independent variables were analysed using random-effects models integrating school and examiner parameters as random effects [25]. Then, a multivariate analysis was conducted to test comparisons between the three disease groups and the healthy comparison group. Mixed-effects multinomial ordinal logistic regression models were performed to identify common indicators associated with the groups. The GLLAMM (Generalized Linear Latent And Mixed Models) package implemented in Stata Software was used [26]. These analyses were applied based on factors considered significant in bivariate analysis and according to clinical relevance. In an attempt to reduce the effect of potential bias, a propensity score was performed in order to balance all relevant variables related to masticatory ability. The probability of having a “number of functional units” (<6) was calculated including covariates known to be clinically relevant (mean DMFT, presence of infectious process, presence of severe oro-facial dysmorphology, perception of recent dental pain, presence of mouth breathing, perception of chewing difficulties, presence of dental anxiety, number of permanent teeth). The propensity score estimation was considered as covariate in the multivariate analysis described previously. The results are reported using the estimated coefficients transformed into relative-risk ratios (RRR), with 95% CI and P-values (p). The level of statistical significance (type I error α) was set at 0.05.

The WHO definitions were used to define obese children in the statistical analyses.

Results

Prevalence of oral diseases and being overweight or obese

Of the 3138 children initially selected, 2734 were examined (744 6-yr-olds, 789 9-yr-olds and 1201 12-yr-olds). The Inter-observer coefficient (ICC) was 9.3% (2.1–32.6%) for the whole group of examiners. The ICC was lowered to 4.1% (0.8%–18%) when one observer who examined 32 children in the Island area was deleted. Prevalence of oral diseases, overweight and obesity, according to WHO cut-offs, for 6, 9 and 12-year-old children are given Table 3 and mean DMFT, BMI and WtHr are presented Table 4. Prevalence of oral diseases, except gingivitis, seemed to increase between 6 and 9-year-olds, and to decrease between 9 and 12-year-olds. Among the 12 years-old group, 47% of the children had at least one untreated carious lesion, 16% suffered from mucosal infectious lesions and 62% showed signs of localised or extended gingivitis. Even if oral breathing or masticatory impairment tended to decrease between age 9 and 12, severe orofacial dysmorphologies were present in 31% of the 12-yr-olds. Ten percent continued to breathe through the mouth and almost 20% had less than 6 posterior functional dental units to chew (including 2.7% with less than 4 PFU). The prevalence of overweight (including obesity) increased greatly between 6 and 9 years and obesity particularly between 9 and 12 years. The proportion of under-weight children was stable at all ages (1.6% to 1.8%). The prevalence of overweight and obesity was higher when measured with the IOTF classification (overweight: 25.5 [23.0–28.1] and obesity: 25.5 [23.0–28.1]) instead of the WHO cut-offs in the 12-yr-olds. Approximately one third of the 12-yr-olds suffered from an excess of abdominal adiposity associated with overweight or obesity. At age 12, mean BMI was 20.9 (4.9) (girls: 21.3 (5.0) and boys: 20.6 (4.7)) and mean WtHr was 0.49 (0.07) for the whole sample (including normal-weight and under-weight children). The mean WtHr was 0.50 (0.04) for over-weight children and 0.58 (0.06) for obese children. Respectively 54% and 96% of the overweight and obese 12 years old children had a WtHr higher than 0.5.
Table 3

Prevalence of oral disease,s overweight and obesity at 6, 9 and 12 years

 

Age 6 yr

Age 9 yr

Age 12 yr

 

N

% [95% CI]

N

% [95% CI]

N

% [95% CI]

At least one untreated carious lesion

744

57.7 [54.0;61.2]

789

59.9 [56.4;63.4]

1201

46.9 [44.0;49.7]

Localised gingivitis

731

44.6 [41.0;48.3]

787

43.6 [40.1;47.1]

1201

36.8 [34.1;39.6]

Generalised gingivitis

 

8.5 [6.6;10.7]

 

16.0 [13.5;18.8]

 

25.4 [22.9;27.9]

At least one infectious dental process

737

13.8 [11.4;16.5]

782

12.7 [10.4;15.2]

1198

16.3 [14.3;18.5]

At least one severe oro-facial dysmorphology

739

31.1[27.8;34.6]

782

38.6 [35.2;42.1]

1198

31.5 [29.0;34.2]

Oral (or mixed) breathing

717

28.5 [25.2;31.9]

770

27.8 [24.7;31.1]

1193

10.6 [8.9;12.5]

Number of posterior functional units

NI

 

754

 

1201

 

 PFU < 4

   

15.1 [12.6;17.9]

 

2.7 [1.9;3.8]

 4 ≤ PFU < 6

   

43.1 [39.5;46.7]

 

17.0 [14.9;19.2]

 PFU ≥ 6

   

41.8 [38.2;45.4]

 

80.3 [77.9;82.5]

According to WHO cut-offs

721

 

773

 

1182

 

 Under-weight

 

1.8 [1.1;3.1]

 

1.6 [0.9;2.7]

 

1.8 [1.1;2.7]

 Normal-weight

 

79.6 [76.5;82.4]

 

68.9 [65.6;72.1]

 

55.5 [52.6;58.3]

 Over-weight

 

10.8 [8.8;13.3]

 

18.1 [15.6;21.0]

 

22.2 [19.9–24.7]

 Obesity

 

7.8 [6.0;9.9]

 

11.4 [9.3;13.8]

 

20.5 [18.2–22.9]

WtHr ≥ 0.5

735

29.4 [26.2;32.8]

756

29.0 [25.8;32.3]

1200

34.3 [31.6–37.1]

N number, % proportion, NI not investigated, CI confidence interval

Table 4

Stature-Weight status and caries experience of children aged 6, 9 and 12 years

 

Age 6 yr

Age 9 yr

Age 12 yr

 

N

mean[CI]

N

mean[CI]

N

mean[CI]

DMFT

594

0.09 [0.05;0.12]

789

0.76 [0.67;0.85]

1201

2.09 [1.93;2.25]

BMI

740

16.49 [16.33;16.65]

789

18.39 [18.14;18.64]

1182

20.9 [20.6;21.2]

WtHr

735

0.490 [0.487;0.493]

756

0.486 [0.482;0.490]

1198

0.49 [0.48;0.49]

BMI and WtHr Means are given for the whole sample (under-, normal-, over-weight and obese children)

N number, NI not investigated

Among the 1165 children for whom data were complete, 36.6% of the children were healthy (HG), 27.3% had oral diseases but were not obese (ODG), 19.7% were obese but had a good oral status (OG) and 16.5% were affected with both chronic conditions (ODOG).

Common risk indicators for oral disease and obesity

The bivariate analysis showed that environment was significantly associated with the children’s health status. Children from the Islands were highly represented in the ODG group and children from the North in the ODG and ODOG groups. The ethnic groups were significant determinants for the ODG and ODOG groups, Polynesian children being particularly at risk for obesity (Table 5). Behavioural variables, such as tooth brushing less than once a day or smoking, were significant explanatory variables for the groups of children with oral diseases (ODG, ODOG). Inversely, the variable that explored the children nutritional habits (usual sweet drinks consumption or lunch setting) was not a significant risk indicator for the obesity (OG) group. Variables related to experience with dental care or prevention were not related to the ODG and ODOG groups.
Table 5

Association between risk indicators and prevalence of oral diseases and obesity (bivariate analysis)

Groups of the Clinical Oral and General Health Index (COGHI)

Healthy R

Oral diseases

Obesity

Oral diseases & Obesity

Total N (%)

Sex (n = 1155)

 MaleR

35.9%

28.7%

18.9%

16.3%

566 (49.0)

 Female

37.2%

25.8%

20.4%

16.6%

589 (51.0)

Geographical area (n = 1130)

 Islands

33.0%

39.6% **

15.1%

12.3%

71 (6.3)

 North

27.2%

42.7%***

11.8%

18.3%*

246 (21.8)

 South R

39.8%

21.03%

22.6%

16.5%

813 (71.9)

Cultural ethnic group (n = 1128)

 Melanesian

38.1%

26.3%*

22.1%

13.5%**

312 (27.7)

 Caledonian

34.8%

32.1%**

16.0%

17.0%***

505 (44.8)

 Polynesian

27.5%

19.8%*

25.1%**

27.5%***

207 (18.3)

 OthersR

56.7%

20.2%

20.2%

2.9%

104 (9.2)

Type of school (n = 1166)

 Public R

37.2%

26.1%

20.8%

15.9%

881 (75.6)

 Private

34.5%

31.0%

16.2%

18.3%

285 (24.4)

Tooth-brushing frequency (n = 1137)

 ≥1/dayR

41.7%

23.0%

21.5%

13.8%

631(55.5)

  < 1/day

29.3%

32.4%***

18.0%

20.4%***

506 (44.5)

Use of sweet drinks (n = 1163)

 Yes

35.1%

31.0%

16.9%

16.9%

413 (35.5)

 NoR

37.3%

25.3%

21.1%

16.3%

750 (64.5)

Lunch at school (n = 1154)

 YesR

37.1%

25.6%

20.2%

17.1%

1038 (89.9)

 No

32.8%

41.4%**

12.9%

12.9%

116 (10.1)

Smoking habits (n = 1106)

 Already smoked

25.0%

35.6%**

15.9%

23.5%**

132 (11.9)

 NeverR

37.7%

26.7%

19.9%

15.7%

974 (88.1)

Dental attendance (n = 1153)

 Already visited a dentist

37.1%

26.9%

18.9%

17.1%

957 (83.0)

 NeverR

35.2%

29.1%

21.9%

13.8%

196 (17.0)

Dental anxiety (n = 1165)

 Anxiety

36.0%

28.0%

18.6%

17.4%

414 (35.5)

 No anxiety (score ≤ 3)R

36.9%

26.9%

20.2%

16.0%

751(64.5)

Prevention at school (n = 1002)

 No experience

36.9%

26.2%

20.0%

16.9%

691 (68.9)

 Already experiencedR

34.7%

30.5%

20.3%

14.5%

311 (31.1)

The groups Oral disease, Obesity, Oral disease & Obesity are compared with the Healthy group

The bivariate analyses integrate the school and investigator effects

For the explanatory variables, each category is compared with a reference category indicated with a R

Proportions (%) are calculated per line for the different COGHI groups and per column for the total

***P < 104, **P < 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05

The propensity score evaluated the probability of the children having a low number of posterior functional units (<6 PFU) (Table 6). Among the covariates integrated in the model, the presence of mucosal signs of an infectious process, oral breathing, dental anxiety, self-perceived chewing difficulties significantly influenced the score. The number of dental functional units (<6 versus ≥ 6) was also related to the number of present permanent teeth (23.4 vs 26.3, p < 0,001) but not to the number of carious, filled or missing teeth (DMFT), nor to the presence of severe orofacial dysmorphology.
Table 6

Propensity score, probability of having a low number of posterior functional units (<6)

 

RRR

P value

[95% Conf. Interval]

Mean DMFT

1.01

0.74

0.94–1.08

Presence of infectious dental process

1.93

0.01

1.14–3.27

Perception of recent dental pain

0.84

0.43

0.55–1.29

Presence of oro-facial dysmorphology

1.07

0.72

0.73–1.57

Presence of mouth breathing

2.17

0.00 4

1.28–3.67

Perception of chewing difficulties

1.76

0.003

1.21–2.56

Dental anxiety

1.74

0.04

1.19–2.53

Number of permanent teeth

0.74

0.001

0.71–0.78

Logistic regression

Significant RRR and corresponding p values (<0.05) are captured in bold

The multi-dimensional analysis showed that cultural attachment, the region of residence and oral hygiene habits were significantly associated with the health status of children (Table 7). Indeed, comparison between ODOG and HG showed that Natives (Caledonians, Melanesians, Polynesians) were more exposed to both oral diseases and being obese than non-Natives. Ethnicity was the only significant variable related to the OG group and Polynesian children were particularly affected by obesity. Concerning the ODG group, it appeared that children from the North and the Islands regions had respectively a three-times and two-times higher risk of being affected with oral diseases than children in the South. Tooth brushing frequency was a common risk factor for children with oral diseases (ODG) and for children with oral diseases and obesity (ODOG). The propensity score which evaluated the masticatory ability of the children was a significant risk indicator for the OG and the ODOG groups.
Table 7

Multivariate analysis: Risk indicators associated with oral diseases or being obese

Groups of the Clinical Oral and General Health Index (COGHI)

Oral disease

Obesity

Oral disease & Obesity

Sex: girl vs boy

0.81 (0.55–1.21)

0.80 (0.52–1.22)

0.82 (0.52–1.29)

Geographical area:

 North vs South

 Islands vs South

3.27 (1.98–5.40)***

2.20 (1.09–4.43)*

0.78 (0.41–1.47)

0.61 (0.24–1.54)

1.87 (1.04–3.38)*

1.39 (0.59–3.28)

Cultural ethnic group

 Melanesian vs others

1.23 (0.59–2.59)

1.91 (0.89–4.09) p = 0.09

5.19 (1.15–23.50) *

 Caledonian vs others

1.58 (0.79–3.17)

1.63 (0.78–3.39)

9.20 (2.11–40.08) **

 Polynesian vs others

1.90 (0.84–4.30)

2.48 (1.11–5.55) *

16.81 (3.71–76.20)***

Type of school

0.79 (0.50–1.27)

0.79 (0.46–1.35)

0.99 (0.59–1.68)

Private vs Public

Toothbrushing frequency

1.89 (1.26–2.83)**

1.09 (0.70–1.69)

1.75 (1.10–2.78)*

<1/day vs ≥1/day

Smoking habits

 Already smoked vs Never

1.41 (0.76–2.63)

0.95 (0.45–2.01)

1.72 (0.88–3.37)

Use of sweet drinks

 Yes vs No

1.11 (0.66–1.87)

0.77 (0.49–1.21)

1.10 (0.70–1.74)

Dental attendance

1.07 (0 .63–1.83)

0.75 (0.43–1.32)

1.59 (0.83–3.04)

Already visited a dentist vs never

Prevention at school

0.85 (0.56–1.27)

0.96 (0.62–1.50)

1.20 (0.74–1.94)

No vs Already experienced

Propensity score for FU < 6

2.14 (0.70–6.44)

8.49 (2.11–34.15)**

7.01 (1.49–33.00)*

Dental anxiety

Anxiety vs No anxiety (≤3)

1.05 (0.69–1.59)

0.82 (0.51–1.29)

1.24 (0.78–1.99)

Lunch at school

0.95 (0.50–1.83)

0.93 (0.39–2.26)

0.61 (0.26–1.43)

No vs Yes

Mixed-effects multinomial ordinal logistic regression models

The groups Oral disease, Obesity, Oral disease & Obesity are compared with the Healthy group

The school and investigator effects are taken into account for each comparison

***P < 10–4, **P < 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05

Discussion

This study provides useful epidemiological data about obesity in New Caledonian children aged 6 to 12 years. A high prevalence was observed with 8% to 20% of the children being obese and the prevalence was increasing with the age of the children. At age 6 and 9, the prevalence of overweight and obesity, according to WHO cut-offs were similar to the most impacted European countries in 2013 [27]. At age 12, the prevalence of overweight (excluding obesity) (22.2%) was higher than that observed in metropolitan France in 2009 (19.7% at age 12 years) [28] but similar to the average worldwide values calculated for children under 20 in developed countries in 2013 (22.6% to 23.8%,) [2]. In this study, BMI and WtHr data were associated to evaluate accurately the risk of metabolic syndrome. In New Caledonia, one third of the children cumulated excess abdominal adiposity (WtHr >0.5) and general overweight, which are associated with an increased risk for metabolic syndrome, diabetes and cardiovascular comorbidities [23]. Results also indicated that oral diseases remained frequent in NC children. Caries experience at 6, 9 and 12 years was similar to that of other developed countries such as the USA or Europe [29, 30].

Approximately one child on six was thus affected with oral diseases and obesity at 12 years. Obesity or being overweight is key to identifying children with higher metabolic and vascular risk. Nevertheless, only a few studies have examined the association of metabolic syndrome with periodontal diseases (including its first stage, gingival inflammation) and dental caries. Metabolic syndrome seems to be associated with the presence of periodontal pockets, decayed teeth and to the incidence of tooth loss among middle-aged adults [31, 32]. A study has found correlations between the risk of metabolic syndrome and high salivary S. Mutans counts in children [33]. Childhood obesity was also pointed to be associated with reduced flow rate of stimulated saliva and thus being a potential risk factor for dental caries [34].

Obesity in childhood is associated with immediate adverse health and psychosocial outcomes. Obesity can affect children’s educational attainment and quality of life [35]. Obesity has also long-terms negative health, social and even economic consequences. Obese children are likely to remain obese as adults and are thus at risk of chronic illnesses like diabetes, coronary heart diseases or some types of cancer [36]. The life course approach to ageing also suggests that health status at one time is not only dependent on contemporary environmental or behavioural determinants but also on the level of health in earlier life, which depends on developmental processes and early environmental influences [37]. It is thus important in NC to prevent children being overweight but also to treat children who are already obese, for their own well-being, their future health but also that of their children.

Oral diseases also are associated with adverse health and psychosocial outcomes. Children with poor oral health are more likely to experience dental pain and sepsis, to miss school and to perform poorly in school [38]. Adult oral health is associated with intergenerational factors and various aspects of people’s beliefs, social status, dental attendance and self-care operating (as tooth brushing habits) from childhood [39]. In this field, the impact of oral health on general health should not be underestimated. Being edentulous was identified in 2013 as one of the top 25 causes of an increased number of “years lived with disability” [1]. Our results thus indicate that it is important to integrate oral health into the health promotion programs that will need to be conducted in NC to prevent and treat health problems related to obesity.

One of the aims of the study was to identify high-risk population groups through environmental determinants (cultural belonging, area of residence, type of school, prevention at school, lunch setting) in order to target appropriately future health promotion measures. Geographical residence and ethnicity were significant explanatory determinants for both diseases. Native children were at higher risk of suffering from obesity and oral diseases, Polynesian children were particularly at risk for obesity, like it has been described by a previous study conducted among Pacific Islands Natives [40]. The role of ethnicity in the observed health disparities may be related to various genetic, cultural or social determinants. The way of life and health status of Polynesian parents during pregnancy or during infancy may have influenced the development of obesity and oral diseases observed in pre-teens [41]. The identification of cultural enablers and barriers to the implementation of health promotion interventions for these high-risk Native populations are of particular importance in this context [42]. Moreover it would be helpful to quantify the impact of recent and sometimes abrupt lifestyle changes for Native people of the Pacific islands, from their traditional nutritious habits and daily activity to the modern societal organization.

The only study nutritional variable (usual consumption of sugary drinks) was not found to be a significant risk indicator for oral diseases and/or obesity. These results are not in accordance with other findings from large observational studies that supported a link between consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and obesity [14]. Moreover, even if the relationship is complex, frequent sugar consumption is considered to be an important etiological factor for dental caries [28]. Nutritional habits such as meal skipping and consumption of sugary drinks, milk or fresh vegetables have also been shown to be significantly correlated with caries experience or gingivitis while taking into account weight status [43].

Interactions between dental status and nature of food have dominant role as an entraining stimulus for metabolic rhythms, the timing of daily food intake and the fidelity of food entrainment mechanisms. During food oral processing, the teeth are not simple tools that mechanically reduce the food to particles and mix saliva and the food to produce an easy-to-swallow bolus. They are also essential to the neuromotor control of chewing and swallowing, through the periodontal and pulpal sensory receptors that are triggered during interarch contacts. The number of PFU is related to the number of interach contacts. In nutrition studies, chewing difficulties are rarely considered as explaining factors for food selection and feeding behavior. In this study, masticatory ability was integrated in the multivariate analysis as an explanatory variable by using a Propensity score which evaluated the « probability of having a low number of functional units ». Masticatory disability was found to be a significant indicator for the presence of obesity and the association of oral diseases and obesity. Children at age 12 are characterised by recent changes in the posterior dentition leading to a reduced number of teeth in occlusion, which interact with masticatory ability. Our results show that infectious processes of dental origin and the persistence of mouth breathing also reduced chewing ability, which may secondarily cause avoidance of hard and fibrous foods like fruits or vegetables [44]. The limitation of food choices may then favour excessive intakes of highly processed high fat and high carbohydrate foods contributing to obesity [9].

The prevalence of children having already smoked (12%) in NC was slightly higher than that observed in a sample of 11–13 years old children in the city of Marseille (France) where 10.5% declared having already smoked [45]. Smoking may have a negative impact on adolescents’ oral health although the level of evidence is poor [46]. In addition to passive exposure from maternal smoking, stress-related behaviours like smoking represent risk factors for obesity among adolescents or young adults [47]. The future NC Health promotion programme should integrate a multiple risk factors approach with a special interest on tobacco use as well as it should target the most affected populations.

The study design had a number of limitations. The findings were based on self-reported data from the children, mainly dichotomised, which may have limited the precision of the information collected, particularly for nutritional variables. It is also likely that the true frequency of some behaviours, like tobacco-use, was under-reported due to the children’s reluctance to admit “bad habits” in front of health or educational professionals. Social status was not investigated because the children’s answers would not have been reliable enough and the parents’ response rate was highly uncertain. It should also be noted that it is difficult to make comparisons about the prevalence of obesity due to variability in the classifications used. The cut-off values used by the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) give different prevalence values than for the WHO cut points [24].

Conclusions

This survey showed that the prevalence of both overweight and obesity were high in New Caledonian children, indicating the need to implement a comprehensive health promotion programme. Health promoting interventions are usually based on the common risk factor approach, which aims at improving health by preventing the onset or the worsening of several chronic diseases. Before implementing a pertinent health promotion policy in NC, it was thus necessary to target the most affected population groups and to identify the common risk indicators for children suffering from cumulative diseases. In this study, ethnicity was identified to impact deeply the distribution of oral diseases and obesity in New Caledonian 12-year-olds.

The Pacific islands’ original populations (Kanak and Polynesian) were more likely to be affected with one or both chronic diseases. Those ethnic groups were already known to be more affected with other metabolic and infectious diseases in adulthood. However, ethnic health disparities are still not integrated in NC health policies and strategies. To help understand the mechanism of health disparities in NC, the cumulative or independent effect of social and ethnic gradient should be clarified.

Based on these results, local stakeholders have now developed a health promotion program aimed at preventing metabolic syndrome, based on inter-sectorial collaboration and that integrates oral health issues. The promotion of a healthy nutrition is a key issue as the consumption of free sugars is high in NC, particularly the use of soft drinks. Nevertheless, methodological limits of this ancillary descriptive study did not allow to explore thoroughly this aspect. Moreover, the children’s masticatory ability is obviously a major issue for future research.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body mass index

CI: 

Confidence interval

COGHI: 

Clinical oral and global health index

D3: 

Dentinal threshold level

Dft: 

Number of decayed or filled temporary teeth

DMFT: 

Number of missing, decayed or filled permanent teeth

HG: 

Healthy group according to COGHI

IOTF: 

International task force

NC: 

New Caledonia

ODG: 

Oral disease group according to COGHI

ODOG: 

Oral disease and obesity group according to COGHI

OG: 

Obesity group according to COGHI

PFU: 

Number of posterior functional dental units

RRR: 

Relative risk ratio

SD: 

Standard deviation

WHO: 

World health organization

WtHR: 

Waist to height ratio

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The Regional Public Health Services of New Caledonia, the Sanitary and Social Agency of New Caledonia, the University of Auvergne, Clermont-1, France and the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, France financed this study and the authors wish to express appreciation for this support. Clinical parts of the study were assisted by: Drs R Cagliero, P Lefèvre, O Moyon, R Cagliero and G Niquet, whom the authors thank. The authors would like to thank Prof Paul Riordan (Write2Publish; http://correction-home.fr) for correction of the English manuscript.

Funding

Sanitary and Social Agency of New Caledonia, Nouméa, New Caledonia.

Availability of data and materials

The data set collected and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

ST participated in designing the study, conducting the data analysis and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript; HP participated in designing and managing the study, in data collection, in conducting the data analysis and in writing the manuscript; BR participated in designing and managing the study; BP participated in designing the study, conducting the data analysis and writing the manuscript; MH participated in designing and managing the study, in conducting the data analysis and writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The following educational and sanitary competent authorities have been seized to give their approval to the protocol of the study and they were informed of the results: the Evangelical Alliance for School Education (ASEE); the Protestant federation for education (FELP); the Diocesan Directorate for Catholic Education (DDEC); the New Caledonian Vice Rectory; the Directorate for community actions and health in Islands (DACAS); the Directorate for health and social affairs and of social problems in northern province (DASSPS Nord); the Directorate for sanitary and social action of southern province (DPASS-Sud); the Sanitary and Social Agency of New Caledonia (ASSNC); the Directorate of health and social affairs of New Caledonia (DASSNC). Schools were approached through local educational authorities. Explanatory letters and consent forms were sent to parents a few days prior to the dental examinations and those children whose parents returned written consent were examined. Written parental consent and each child’s verbal consent were obtained for all the participants. The ethics committee Sud-Est VI Clermont-Ferrand stated that the study did not raise any particular ethical problem (2017/CE37).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University Clermont Auvergne, EA 4847, Centre de Recherche en Odontologie Clinique, BP 10448, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
(2)
Sanitary and Social Agency of New Caledonia, Nouméa, New Caledonia
(3)
CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Biostatistics Unit, DRCI, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
(4)
CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Dental Unit, Clermont-Ferrand, France

References

  1. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:743–800.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:766–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, Ndiaye C. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:661–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Peres MA, Sheiham A, Liu P, Demarco FF, Silva AE, Assunção MC, et al. Sugar consumption and changes in dental caries from childhood to adolescence. J Dent Res. 2016;95:388–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Egger G, Dixon J. Beyond obesity and lifestyle: a review of 21st century chronic disease determinants. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:731685.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Costacurta M, DiRenzo L, Sicuro L, Gratteri S, De Lorenzo A, Docimo R. Dental caries and childhood obesity: analysis of food intakes, lifestyle. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014;15:343–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Collado V, Pichot H, Delfosse C, Eschevins C, Nicolas E, Hennequin M. Impact of early childhood caries and its treatment under general anesthesia on orofacial function and quality of life: a prospective comparative study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017;2:e333–41.Google Scholar
  8. Ranawana V, Clegg ME, Shafat A, Henry CJ. Postmastication digestion factors influence glycemic variability in humans. Nutr Res. 2011;31:452–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Consolação Soares ME, Ramos-Jorge ML, de Alencar BM, Marques LS, Pereira LJ, Ramos-Jorge J. Factors associated with masticatory performance among preschool children. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:159–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayden C, Bowler JO, Chambers S, Freeman R, Humphris G, Richards D, Cecil JE. Obesity and dental caries in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41:289–308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nascimento GG, Seerig LM, Vargas-Ferreira F, Correa FO, Leite FR, Demarco FF. Are obesity and overweight associated with gingivitis occurrence in Brazilian schoolchildren? J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:1072–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wu L, Chang R, Mu Y, Deng X, Wu F, Zhang S, Zhou D. Association between obesity and dental caries in Chinese children. Caries Res. 2013;47:171–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Heinrich-Weltzien R, Monse B, Benzian H, Heinrich J, Kromeyer-Hauschild K. Association of dental caries and weight status in 6- to 7-year-old Filipino children. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:1515–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Honne T, Pentapati K, Kumar N, Acharya S. Relationship between obesity/overweight status, sugar consumption and dental caries among adolescents in South India. Int J Dent Hyg. 2012;10:240–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pichot H, Hennequin M, Rouchon B, Pereira B, Tubert-Jeannin S. Dental status of new Caledonian children: is there a need for a new oral health promotion programme? PLoS One. 2014;9:e112452.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Agence Sanitaire et Sociale de Nouvelle Calédonie. Baromètre Santé. http://www.ass.nc/etudes-et-recherches/barometres-sante/barometre-sante-adulte-2015 (2015). Accessed 10 Apr 2017.
  17. Corsenac P, Heenan RC, Roth A, Rouchon B, Guillot N, Hoy D. An epidemiological study to assess the true incidence and prevalence of rheumatic heart disease and acute rheumatic fever in new Caledonian school children. J Paediatr Child Health. 2016;52:739–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ekstrand KR, Kuzmina I, Bjørndal L. Thylstrup a relationship between external and histologic features of progressive stages of caries in the occlusal fossa. Caries Res. 1995;29:243–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand. 1963;21:533–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hennequin M, Moysan V, Jourdan D, Dorin M, Nicolas E. Inequalities in oral health for children with disabilities: a French national survey in specials schools. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2564.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:660–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. de Onis M. Update on the implementation of the WHO child growth standards. World Rev Nutr Diet. 2013;106:75–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nambiar S, Truby H, PSW D, Baxter K. Use of the waist-height ratio to predict metabolic syndrome in obese children and adolescents. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013;49:E281–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000;320:1240–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Donald A, Donner A. Adjustments to the mantel-Haenszel chi-square statistic and odds ratio variance estimator when the data are clustered. Stat Med. 1987;6:491–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station: Stata Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  27. Wijnhoven TM, van Raaij JM, Yngve A, Sjöberg A, Kunešová M, Duleva V, et al. WHO European childhood obesity surveillance initiative: health-risk behaviours on nutrition and physical activity in 6-9-year-old schoolchildren. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18:3108–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Tramini P, Molinari N, Tentscher M, Demattei C, Schulte AG. Association between caries experience and body mass index in 12-year-old French children. Caries Res. 2009;43:468–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Petersen PE. The world oral health report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century--the approach of the WHO global oral health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31:S3–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Enjary C, Tubert-Jeannin S, Manevy R, Roger-Leroi V, Riordan PJ. Dental status and measures of deprivation in Clermont-Ferrand, France. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006;34:363–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Timonen P, Niskanen M, Suominen-Taipale L, Jula A, Knuuttila M, Ylöstalo P. Metabolic syndrome, periodontal infection, and dental caries. J Dent Res. 2010;89:1068–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Furuta M, Liu A, Shinagawa T, Takeuchi K, Takeshita T, Shimazaki Y, Yamashita Y. Tooth loss and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged Japanese adults. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43:482–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Osawa H, Sugihara N, Ukiya T, Ishizuka Y, Birkhed D, Hasegawa M, Matsukubo T. Metabolic syndrome, lifestyle, and dental caries in Japanese school children. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2015;56:233–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Modéer T, Blomberg C, Wondimu B, Lindberg TY, Marcus C. Association between obesity and periodontal risk indicators in adolescents. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:e264–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pizzi MA, Vroman K. Childhood obesity: effects on children's participation, mental health, and psychosocial development. Occup Ther Health Care. 2013;27:99–112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Llewellyn A, Simmonds M, Owen CG, Woolacott N. Childhood obesity as a predictor of morbidity in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17:56–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hanson MA, Cooper C, Aihie Sayer A, Eendebak RJ, Clough G, Beard JR. Developmental aspects of a life course approach to healthy ageing. J Physiol. 2016;594:2147–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Jackson SL, Vann WF Jr, Kotch JB, Pahel BT, Lee JY. Impact of poor oral health on children's school attendance and performance. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:1900–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Broadbent JM, Zeng J, Foster Page LA, Baker SR, Ramrakha S, Thomson WM. Oral health-related beliefs, behaviors, and outcomes through the life course. J Dent Res. 2016;95:808–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Oliver M, Rush E, Schluter P, Sundborn G, Iusitini L, Tautolo e-S, et al. An exploration of physical activity, nutrition, and body size in Pacific children. Pac Health Dialog. 2011;17:176–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Dixon B, Peña MM, Taveras EM. Lifecourse approach to racial/ethnic disparities in childhood obesity. Adv Nutr. 2012;3:73–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Gibson O, Lisy K, Davy C, Aromataris E, Kite E, Lockwood C, et al. Enablers and barriers to the implementation of primary health care interventions for indigenous people with chronic diseases: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2015;10:71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Kesim S, Çiçek B, Aral CA, Öztürk A, Mazıcıoğlu MM, Kurtoğlu S. Oral health, obesity status and nutritional habits in Turkish children and adolescents: an epidemiological study. Balkan Med J. 2016;33:164–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Walls AW, Steele JG, Sheiham A, Marcenes W, Moynihan PJ. Oral health and nutrition in older people. J Public Health Dent. 2000;60:304–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Saadjian M, Gouitaa M, Lanteaume A, Ramadour M, Vervloet D, Charpin D. Factors associated with smoking in sixth grade (11-13 years old). Rev Mal Respir. 2002;19:431–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Benedetti G, Campus G, Strohmenger L, Lingström P. Tobacco and dental caries: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:363–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Jääskeläinen A, Nevanperä N, Remes J, Rahkonen F, Järvelin MR, Laitinen J. Stress-related eating, obesity and associated behavioural traits in adolescents: a prospective population-based cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:321.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement