How parents perceive screen viewing in their 5–6 year old child within the context of their own screen viewing time: a mixed-methods study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 23 August 2016
Accepted: 8 May 2017
Published: 1 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Catherine Draper|
|12 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Budd|
|31 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Janice Thompson|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Janice Thompson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|1 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4394-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.