Skip to main content

Table 3 Impact of social network satisfaction on incident T2D risk by living alone or social isolation, estimated by Cox regression with different adjustments (interaction analyses), in women (n = 3270)

From: Sex differences in the association of social network satisfaction and the risk for type 2 diabetes

  

Living in a partnership

Living alone

Socially connected

Socially isolated

Model

SNS

HR (95% CI)

p value

HR (95% CI)

p value

HR (95% CI)

p value

HR (95% CI)

p value

Model 1

moderate

1.13

(0.82–1.56)

0.465

0.75

(0.45–1.25)

0.274

1.60

(1.06–2.42)

0.025

0.70

(0.48–1.00)

0.051

low

2.41

(1.16–5.01)

0.018

0.35

(0.05–2.55)

0.301

N/A*

1.33

(0.66–2.68)

0.424

p for interaction

0.191 (moderate),

0.075 (low)

0.003 (moderate)

Model 2

moderate

1.20

(0.86–1.67)

0.278

0.80

(0.48–1.34)

0.403

1.57

(1.03–2.37)

0.034

0.77

(0.53–1.12)

0.168

low

2.22

(1.06–4.64)

0.034

0.28

(0.04–2.07)

0.212

N/A*

1.25

(0.62–2.53)

0.538

p for interaction

0.194 (moderate),

0.046 (low)

0.007 (moderate)

Model 3

moderate

1.17

(0.84–1.63)

0.355

0.76

(0.44–1.29)

0.308

1.56

(1.01–2.39)

0.044

0.74

(0.51–1.08)

0.120

low

2.11

(1.00–4.44)

0.049

0.27

(0.04–1.98)

0.196

N/A*

1.17

(0.57–2.39)

0.675

p for interaction

0.186 (moderate)

0.047 (low)

0.010 (moderate)

  1. *estimates not possible due to low case numbers
  2. Reference category: High social network satisfaction