Skip to main content

Table 3 Estimates of cross price elasticity of demand for PT with respect to fuel price, focusing on Australian values

From: Obesity-related health impacts of fuel excise taxation- an evidence review and cost-effectiveness study

Source

Type of study

Estimate

BITRE database [33], Table 1D03

Cited from study by Goodwin [101]

0.34

BITRE database [33], Table 2D18

Cited from studies by Cervero 1990 and Wang & Skinner 1984

(further details not given)

0.08 to 0.80

Currie & Phung 2006 [74]

Review within primary study

0.07 to 0.8

Currie & Phung 2008 [75]

Review within primary study

LR: 0.07 to 0.30

Holmgren 2007 [78]

Review

Meta-analysis

0.38 (s.e 0.31)

SR: 0.82 (95% UI 0.56 to 1.08)

LR: 1.15 (95% UI 0.65 to 1.65)

Kennedy & Wallis 2007 [76]

Review

0 to 0.20

Litman 2016 [73]

Non-systematic review

SR: 0.05 to 0.15

LR: 0.2 to 0.4

Luk & Hepburn 1993 [77]

Review

SR: 0.07

  1. Table notes: BITRE Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economics, LR long-run, s.e standard error, SR short-run, UI uncertainty interval