Skip to main content

Table 4 Health facility factors with intention to screen and willingness to vaccinate daughters against cervical cancer

From: Women’s intention to screen and willingness to vaccinate their daughters against cervical cancer – a cross sectional study in eastern Uganda

 

Intention to screen (n = 819)

Willingness to vaccinate daughters (n = 813)

Characteristic

N (%)

Unadjusted PR (95% CI)

p-value

N (%)

Unadjusted PR (95% CI)

p-value

Where health care is accessed when sick

Private facility

166 (97.1)

  

168 (96.5)

  

Government facility

653 (92.6)

0.95 [0.92–0.99]

0.006*

645 (92.4)

0.96 [0.92–0.99]

0.015*

Where reproductive health care is accessed

Private facility

153 (96.8)

  

157 (97.5)

  

Government facility

666 (92.8)

0.96 [0.92–0.99]

0.016*

656 (92.3)

0.95 [0.91–0.98]

0.001*

Ease of access of reproductive health care

Very/somewhat difficult

372 (92.8)

  

378 (94.9)

  

Not difficult

447 (94.1)

1.01 [0.98–1.05]

0.428

435 (91.8)

0.97 [0.93–1.00]

0.056

Have challenges in accessing reproductive health care

Yes

480 (92.5)

  

487 (94.0)

  

No

339 (95.0)

1.02 [0.99–1.06]

0.131

326 (92.1)

0.98 [0.94–1.02]

0.279

Ever been recommended for screening by health worker

No

749 (94.0)

  

737 (92.9)

  

Yes

70 (88.6)

0.94 [0.87–1.02]

0.155

76 (96.2)

1.03 [0.99–1.08]

0.157

Knew where cervical cancer screening is provided

No

496 (95.7)

  

489 (95.9)

  

Yes

323 (90.2)

0.94 [0.91–0.98]

0.003*

324 (89.5)

0.93 [0.89–0.97]

0.001*

Distance to health facility where screening is done (n–372)

5 or more km

140 (84.8)

  

139 (84.2)

  

Less than 5 km

183 (94.8)

1.12 [1.04–1.20]

0.003*

187 (94.9)

1.13 [1.05–1.21]

0.001*

Distance to nearest health facility

5 or more km

128 (91.4)

  

125 (89.9)

  

Less than 5 km

691 (93.9)

1.03 [0.97–1.08]

0.336

688 (93.9)

1.04 [0.98–1.10]

0.153

  1. *p < 0.05