Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary of quantitative scores for intervention phase 2 (implementation phase) per school

From: Evaluating the implementation process of a participatory organizational level occupational health intervention in schools

 

School A

School B

10. Middle management support (% employees that perceives managerial support for action plana)

57.1% (n = 32/56)

51.1% (n = 23/45)

11. Participation (% yes)

 I feel responsible for the implementation of the action plana

73.2% (n = 41/56)

76.1% (n = 35/46)

 I feel responsible for the content of the action plana

71.4% (n = 40/56)

76.1% (n = 35/46)

  Employee involvement (% employees who feel involved in action plan)

55.4% (n = 31/56)

37.0% (n = 17/46)

12. Targeting (SD)b

 Satisfaction with content of the action plana

6.5 (1.31) (n = 61)

5.4 (1.96) (n = 49)

14. Communication (% yes)

  Are you informed about the progress in the action plan a ?

86.7% (n = 52/60)

38.3% (n = 18/47)

  How were you informed (more answers possible)?

  Via information meetings organized by the management team

75% (n = 39/52)

61.1% (n = 11/18)

  Via work meetings

44.2% (n = 23/52)

44.4% (n = 8/18)

  Via the news letter

40.4% (n = 21/52)

38.9% (n = 7/18)

  In another way

7.7% (n = 4/52)

16.7% (n = 3/18)

16. Exposure (% yes)

  Have you been informed on the existence of the action plan a ?

100% (n = 61/61)

87.8% (n = 43/49)

  Are you familiar with the goals of the action plan a ?

  unambiguous management control teams

83.6% (n = 51/61)

-

  competence and professionalism in the teams

90.2% (n = 55/61)

-

  adequate facilities

90.2% (n = 55/61)

-

  make teams the central executive units

-

89.8% (n = 44/49)

  adequate and effective management control

-

67.3% (n = 33/49)

  Have you seen changes towards these goals:

  unambiguous management control teams

43.3% (n = 26/60)

-

  competence and professionalism in the teams

43.3% (n = 26/60)

-

  adequate facilities (quick wins)

83.6% (n = 51/61)

-

  make teams the central executive units

-

59.6% (n = 28/47)

  adequate and effective management control

-

25.5% (n = 12/47)

  Are the quick wins c celebrated as a success?

67.2% (n = 41/61)

-

  Did you notice a change in:

  a dialogue on the organization of education

78.3% (n = 47/60)

-

  performance reviews

76.7% (n = 46/60)

-

  team activities plan

58.3% (n = 35/60)

-

  work meetings

56.7% (n = 34/60)

-

  workload policy

45% (n = 27/60)

-

  competence development plan

28.3% (n = 17/60)

-

  teams develop a team- and educational program conform the regulations

-

66.0% (n = 31/47)

  a better and larger management team

-

57.4% (n = 27/47)

  management sets guiding standards

-

31.9% (n = 15/47)

  management is permanently accessible

-

36.2% (n = 17/47)

  management coaches teachers in educational leadership

-

19.1% (n = 9/47)

  management eliminates ‘cumbersome’ administrative procedures

-

8.5% (n = 4/47)

% of participants that feels exposed to the intervention

56.9% (n = 33/58)

39.1% (n = 18/46)

20. Readiness for change (% employees who feel ready for the change)

46.4% (n = 26/56)

54.3% (n = 25/46)

21. Satisfaction (SD)b with implementation of the action plan/advisory report

5.7 (1.4) (n = 58)

4.4 (1.7) (n = 46)

  1. a Since no action plan was constructed in school B, the question concerned the advisory report
  2. b SD is standard deviation. Being content with action plan was rated on a 1–10 scale (1 = very unsatisfied; 10 = very satisfied) and the average satisfaction rate could be classified as poor (<6), moderate (≥6 and <7.5) or high (≥7.5)
  3. c The quick wins are the ‘adequate facilities’ in school A