Evaluating the implementation process of a participatory organizational level occupational health intervention in schools

Schelvis, Roosmarijn M. C.; Wiezer, Noortje M.; Blatter, Birgitte M.; van Genabeek, Joost A. G. M.; Oude Hengel, Karen M.; Bohlmeijer, Ernst T.; van der Beek, Allard J.

doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3869-0

Table 2 Summary of quantitative and qualitative results per process component for school A and B

From: Evaluating the implementation process of a participatory organizational level occupational health intervention in schools

Process component		Requirement	School A		School B
Intervention phase 1: needs assessment			Quan.	Qual.	Quan.	Qual.
1	Initiation	Were senior and middle management committed to the intervention at the start?	-	Yes	-	Yes
2	Communication	Was the intervention project communicated to the employees?	-	Yes	-	Yes
3	Participation	Was a participatory group formed?	-	Yes	-	Partly
3	Participation	Did the employees feel involved in the intervention?	Yes	-	No	-
4	Fidelity	Was intervention phase 1 delivered by HM-facilitator according to protocol?	-	Yes	-	Yes
5	Reach	Was intervention phase 1 received by majority of the employees?	Yes	Partly	No	Partly
6	Communication	Were results of each step in phase 1 communicated to employees by HM-facilitator?	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
7	Satisfaction	Were the employees satisfied with intervention phase 1?	Yes	Partly	Yes	Partly
8	Managerial support	Was managerial support present at T1 according to management and employees?	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
9	Readiness for change	Was the majority of the employees at T1 ready for the change?	Yes	-	No	-
Process component		Requirement	School A		School B
Intervention phase 2: implementation			Quan.	Qual.	Quan.	Qual.
10	Middle management support	Was an action plan formulated by middle managers based on the advisory report?	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
10	Middle management support	Were quick wins formulated?	Yes	Yes	No	Partly
11	Participation	Did the employees participate in formulating an action plan?	Yes	No	Partly	No
12	Targeting	Did the action plan target the right problems in the workplace?	Yes	Partly	No	No
13	Senior management support	Did senior management support the action plan?	-	Partly	-	Partly
14	Communication	Was the action plan communicated to the employees?	Yes	Yes	No	Partly
15	Delivery	Was the action plan implemented by middle managers?	-	Yes	-	Partly
16	Exposure	Were the employees exposed to implementation of the action plan?	Partly	Partly	Partly	Partly
17	Culture	Did the organizational culture facilitate the implementation of the action plan?	-	No	-	No
18	Conditions	Did the organization have the capacity to implement the action plan?	-	Partly	-	No
19	Events	Did no events interfere with the implementation of the action plan?	-	No	-	No
20	Readiness for change	Was the majority of the employees at T2 ready for the change?	No	No	Yes	No
21	Satisfaction	Were the employees satisfied with intervention phase 2?	No	-	No	-
22	Perception	Did implementers and employees perceive the intervention as positive?	-	Partly	-	No

Note. Quan quantitative data, ie questionnaire at T1 and T2, Qual qualitative data, ie continuous records by logs, interviews at T1 and group interviews at T2. (−): this aspect was not assessed quantitatively/qualitatively

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us

Submission enquiries: bmcpublichealth@biomedcentral.com
General enquiries: ORSupport@springernature.com

BMC Public Health

Contact us