Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of study characteristics

From: A systematic review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults aged 18–65 years: a socio-ecological approach

AuthorREF

Number, age, gender

Design

Outcome

Individual factors

Environmental factors

Interpersonal factors

Quality score

Astell-Burt [14]

246920 adults

74–106 years

48 % men

CS

Sitting time

 

Proximity of green spaces

 

0.86

Ballard [35]

116 men

Mean age = 19.54

CS

TV Viewing

Video games

Reading

BMI, body fat %, frequency of exercise, length of exercise, days of moderate activity, days of walking

  

0.86

Barnett [73]

3334 adults

45–79 years

48 % men

PO

Changes in TV viewing time

Age, retirement, social class, levels of PA

  

0.90

Bowman [32]

9157

≥20 years

CS

TV Viewing

Age, sex, education, race, ethnicity

  

0.86

Chau [38]

10785 adults

15–69 years

42 % men

CS

Leisure sitting time

Sitting time at work

Occupational activity

  

0.90

Clark [68]

Young cohort:

n = 5215, age 24.6 (1.5) mid-aged cohort:

n = 6973, age

52.5 (1.4)

100 % women

P

Hours per day total sitting (visiting friends, reading, driving, reading, watching TV or working at desk/computer) on week and weekend days

Life events in the previous 12 months: major illness surgery, return to study, moving out, decreased income, menopause,

 

Life events in the previous 12 months: decline health of close family, birth of child, begin work, loss of job, change at work, divorce, new relationship, retirement, spouse retirement, child leaving home

0.84

Clark [48]

10951 adults

25–91 years

45 % men

CS

Time spent in TVSE

Age, education, household income, employment status

Living outside the state capital city

Living arrangements

0.95

Clemes [39]

170 adults

18–65 years

30 % men

CS

Time spent sedentaryO

Levels of PA outside work

 

Workdays vs. non-workdays

0.77

Coogan [8]

59000 women

21–69 years

CS

TV Viewing

 

Neighbourhood walkability, neighbourhood SES

 

0.81

Conroy [45]

128 adults

Mean age = 31,3 (SD = 1,1)

41 % men

CS

Time spent sedentaryO

Sedentary habits, daily intentions to limit sedentary behaviour, levels of PA

  

0.86

Crespo [86]a

1313 adults

Mean age = 45 (SD = 10)

56 % men

CS

Time spent sedentaryO

Age, gender, education, ethnicity

Worksite promotion index including: shower facilities at work, lockers for clothes at work, safe bicycle storage

 

0.95

De Cocker [64]

5562 women

L

Changes in sitting time

Weight

  

0.91

De Cocker [54]

993 adults mean age 51

CS

Occupational sitting time

Gender, age, educational level, household income, self-reported health, self-efficacy about sitting less, intention to sit less

 

Social norm towards sitting less in work, social support towards sitting less in work

0.91

De Wit [57]

3005 adults

18–65 years

34 % men

CS

Time spent watching TV or using PC

Depressive symptoms, anxiety disorders

  

0.82

Den Hoed [69]

1654 adults twins

2 % men

Mean age = 56 (SD = 10)

CS

Time spent sedentaryO

Heritability (additive genetic factors)

  

0.90

Ding [9]

551 adults

20–70 years olds

39 % men

L

Changes in TV viewing time

Age, gender, education, annual household income, employment status, occupational PA, domestic PA, transport PA

Neighbourhood walkability index, neighbourhood pedestrian infrastructures, aesthetics, traffic-related safety, crime-related safety

Neighbourhood SES

Living arrangements, number of children (<18 years) in the household

Social interactions and social cohesion, sense of community

0.91

Ding [26]

37570 adults average age 61 year, 54 % female

CS

Time spent driving (motorised transport)

Smoking, alcohol consumption, dietary risk, physical activity levels, sleep quality, BMI, quality of life, self-rated health

  

0.91

Ekelund [56]

393 adults

Mean age = 49,7 (SD = 8)

45 % men

P

Time spent sedentaryO

BMI, fat mass, waist circumference

  

0.91

Evenson [70]

359 women

≥16 years

CS

Time spent sedentaryO

Pregnancy

  

0.91

Fields [11]

189 adults

Mean age = 32 (SD = 10,2)

31 % men

CS

Time spent sedentary outside of work

 

Residential density, bike facilities, sidewalk, proximity of a bus stop, access to services, recreation facilities, traffic safety, safe park, crime safety

 

0.82

Frank [83]

10876 adults 46 % male

CS

Car time as passenger or driver

 

Land use mix, intersection, density, residential density

 

0.86

George [67]

15 men

35–64 years

Q

Barriers to decreasing sedentary time

Health status and working hours

Weather as a barrier, access to recreation facilities

Social interactions and sense of community and family support

0.82

Granner [31]

189 women

18–60 years

CS

TV viewing

Sitting time

Time spent sedentary

Age, education, employment status, ethnicity, eat meals or snacks while watching TV, BMI, self-rated health, number of days per month depressed, number of days per month anxious

  

0.86

Grothe [30]

39 women

≥18 years

CS

Time spent sedentaryO

TV Viewing

Video games

Computer work

Paper work

Phone use

Reading

Doing artwork

Transportation sitting time

Age, education, income, ethnicity, food cravings, BMI, illness

  

0.90

Hadgraft [40]

1235 adults mean age 53.7 38 % women

CS

Occupational sitting time and TV viewing time

Income, profession, energy intake, educational attainment, leisure time physical activity, BMI

 

Marital status

0.90

Hagströmer [13]

1172 adults

19–69 years

45 % men

CS

Time spent sedentaryO

 

Region, season

 

0.81

Hamer [29]

3923 adults

Mean age = 51 (SD = 15,8)

CS

Time spent in TVSE

Deprivation, BMI, mental health, physical function, psychological distress, smoking, alcohol intake, fruits and vegetables intake

  

0.86

Hamrik [50]

19-90 years

CS

Time spent sedentary

Age, gender

  

0.7

Hirooka [43]

97 adults

≥18 years

41 % men

CS

Sitting/lying time

TV/computer time

Total time in exercise, localization (Japan vs. USA)

  

0.8

Ishii [63]

1034 adults

40–69 years

52 % men

CS

Time spent in TVSE

Age, gender, education, household income, employment status

BMI

 

Living arrangements, marital status

0.90

Jans [74]

7720 adults

Mean age = 32 (SD = 11)

60 % men

CS

Total sedentary time

Total sitting time

Sitting time at work

Sitting time commuting

Sitting time during house work

Sitting time during the day/evening

Occupational groups, business sectors

  

0.72

Kaufman [33]

> 20 years

CS

Time spent sedentary outside of work

Smoking

  

0.86

Kozo [59]

2196 adults

Mean age = 45 (SD = 11)

51 % years

CS

Time spent sedentaryO

Driving/riding in car

TV/video viewing

Video games

Total Sitting minutes

Computer/Internet use for leisure

Reading

Sitting and talking with friends or listening to music

Talking on phone

Age, gender, education, income

Neighbourhood walkability index, neighbourhood income

Child living at home

0.90

Kouvonen [51]

38151 adults

17–64 years

20 % men

CS

Time spent sedentary

Work effort-reward balance

  

0.95

Kozey-Keadle [44]

58 adults

20–60 years

67 % men

QEX

Time spent sedentary

Exercise, intervention to decrease sedentary behaviour

  

0.64

Lee [85]

410 women age = 42.5 (SD = 9.3)

CS

Time spent sitting in motor vehicles Total sitting time

 

Pedestrian crossing aids, sidewalk traffic buffers, traffic control device, number of path connections, posted speed limits, neighbourhood attractiveness, neighbourhood safety

 

0.82

Lepp [46]

302 adults

44 % men

CS

Leisure sedentary activities

Cell phone use

  

0.82

Li [42]

131 women

CS

Time spent in TVSE

Age, education, work status, lack of PA, BMI, depressive symptoms, Perceived stress, knowledge/beliefs

 

Marital status, number of children in the household, family functioning

0.95

Mabry [52]

10 adults

50 % men

Q

Barriers to reduce prolonged sitting

Lack of motivation, knowledge/beliefs

Weather, access to facilities

Social norms and community participation

0.80

Menai [41]

2841 adults age 57.3 +/− 5.0 years

38.3 % men

L

Total leisure SB, Leisure TV viewing, leisure computer use, leisure reading, occupational sitting, domestic sitting

PA (leisure, walking, gardening, swimming, biking, occupational, domestic)

 

Working status: retirement status

0.88

Munir [66]

4436 adults

Age from <24 to >55 years

44 % men

CS

Occupational sitting

Age, BMI, PA levels, education, job grade

 

Married/cohabitating, dependents, work engagement, job demands, job performance

0.84

Oliver [18]

2033 adults 20–65 years 43 % male

CS

Occupational sitting time

 

Neighbourhood level social deprivation

 

0.76

Parry [76]

22-59 years

CS

Time spent sedentaryO

  

Workdays vs. non-workdays

0.90

Pomerleau [28]

6461 adults

19–65 years

CS

Leisure time spent sedentary

Education, income, smoking, alcohol, vegetables intake

Rural vs. urban setting

 

0.68

Proper [49]

2650 adults

20–65 years

48 % men

O

Sitting time on weekdays

Sitting time on weekend days

Sitting in leisure time

Age, gender, education, household income, total PA, working hours

Neighbourhood SES

 

0.86

Rhodes [72]

206 adults

Mean age = 54 (SD = 18.6)

51 % men

174 students

Mean age = 22 (SD = 13.2)

26 % men

CS

TV Viewing

Computer-Use

Reading/Music

Socializing

Attitude, intention, perceived behaviour control, subjective norm

  

0.64

Saidj [17]

2308 adults 18–69 years 46 % men

CS / P

Leisure time sitting

 

Habitat type (apartment versus house) and habitat size (surface area)

Household size (number of occupants)

0.76

Saidj [53]

35444 adults

44.5 ± 13.0 years

79 % women

CS

Domain-specific sitting time (work, transport, leisure)

Occupation type, perceptions towards PA, age, gender, education

 

Workdays versus non-workdays

0.84

Salmon [47]

1332 adults

> 18 years

45 % men

CS

Time spent sedentary

TV Viewing

Reading

Sitting Socializing

Age, gender, lack of time to be active, enjoyment of PA, preference, tiredness, Injury, disability

Sidewalks, air or noise pollution, weather (perceived as a barrier), safety, no access to facilities

Family commitments, work commitments

0.8

Seguin [25]

92234 women

50–79 years

P

Time spent sedentary

Age, education, ethnicity, perceived health, physical function, previous fall, BMI, chronic diseases, hormone use, medication, alcohol intake, levels of PA, smoking

 

Marital status

0.8

Stamatakis [80]

7940 adults

Mean age = 47 (SD = 18.2)

44 % men

CS

Time spent in TVSE

Education, household income

Neighbourhood deprivation

Social class

0.95

Stamatakis [79]

60404 adults

≥45 years

46 % men

CS

Total sitting time

TV viewing

Computer time

Driving

Education, annual household income

Area-level index of socio-economic advantage

 

0.95

Stamatakis [22]

2289 adults

CS

TV viewing time

Sitting time in work

Sitting time outside work

Household income, social class, educational attainment, overall socioeconomic position score

Area deprivation score

 

0.91

Storgaard [12]

48192 adults

44 % men

CS

Leisure time spent sedentary

Education, employment status

Density of green spaces

 

0.91

Strong [84]

1374 adults mean age = 45 (SD = 12.9)

25 % men

CS

TV viewing

 

Neighbourhood problems neighbourhood conditions

 

0.81

Sugiyama [34]

2224 adults

20–65 years

37 % men

CS

TV Viewing

Age, education working status, income, BMI, leisure time PA

Neighbourhood SES, neighbourhood walkability

 

0.91

Sugiyama [61]

2046 adults

20–65 years

36 % men

CS

Time spent in other sedentary behaviours (except TV viewing)

Time spent watching TV

  

0.95

Sugiyama [65]

1408 adults

20–65 years

38 % men

CS

Time spent watching TV

BMI

  

0.95

Sugiyama [77]

74788 adults >18 years

48 % men

P

Prolonged time in car

Age, work status, household income, car ownership

Suburb, vicinity to CDD

Household composition

0.68

Teychenne [62]

1554 women

18–65 years

CS

TV Viewing

Education, enjoyment of TV, preference for sedentary behaviour, stress and depressive symptoms

Neighbourhood safety, neighbourhood aesthetic, distance to places of interest, distance to physical activity facilities

Social cohesion, social participation, social support

0.92

Thorp [75]

193 adults

34 % men

CS

Time spent sedentaryO

Type of work

 

Workdays vs. Non-workdays

0.92

Touvier [78]

1389 adults

45–60 years

50 % men

P

TV Viewing

Retirement

  

0.95

Uijtdewilligen [27]

11676 adults, women only

P

Time spent sitting at the weekend and time spent sitting on weekdays

BMI, country of birth, highest educational qualification, physical activity levels, smoking, alcohol consumption, stress levels, occupational status

Area of residence

Number of children in the household, marital status, work commitment

0.84

Uijtdewilligen [71]

475 from 13 to 42 years old

47 % men

L

Screen time: TV during leisure on week or weekend days and time spent behind computer during leisure during week and weekend days (h/week)

  

Daily hassles (like conflicts with colleagues, misbehaving

Children and being displeased about personal appearance, and being laughed at,…)

Life events (health, work, home/family, personal/social relations, finance)

0.84

Vandelanotte [36]

2532 adults

20–65 years

39 % men

CS

Leisure time internet and computer use

BMI, Other leisure time sedentary behaviour (except TVSE)

  

0.86

Van Dyck [82]

1200 adults

20–65 years

47 % men

CS

Time spent sedentaryO

Age, gender, education, employment status, occupation

Neighbourhood walkability index, neighbourhood SES

Living situation

0.95

Van Dyck [55]

419 adults

20–65 years

47 % men

CS

TV Viewing

Leisure time internet use

Age, gender, education, employment status, BMI, pros reducing TV viewing, cons reducing TV viewing, self-efficacy reducing TV viewing, pros reducing internet use, cons reducing internet use

Number of PCs, number of TVS, size of the largest TV set

Family social norm TV viewing, friends norm TV viewing, family social norm internet use

0.9

Van Dyck [60]

6014 adults

20–65 years

44 % men

CS

Overall sitting time

Motorized transport time

Age, gender, education, having a drivers licence, BMI

Not many cul-de-sacs, not many barriers in neighbourhood, aesthetics, street, connectivity, walking and cycling facilities, access to services, proximity to destinations, number of different type of destinations within 20 min walk from home, parking difficult near local shopping area, traffic safety, crime safety, residential density

Living with a partner

0.95

Van Holle [16]

2839 adults 55–65 years 52 % men

CS

Sitting time during the weekend days

 

Social trust and cohesion, personal safety, aesthetics, mean destination score, number of TVs in the house

Social participation, social support from friends or colleagues (

0.80

Van Uffelen [24]

8920 women

25–30 years

11018 women

50–55 years

CS

Sitting time

Education, income, studying, occupation, country of birth, alcohol intake, levels of PA, passive leisure activities, poor sleeping, smoking, BMI, chronic conditions, stiff/painful joints

Area of residence

Marital status, number of children, caring for family members

0.90

Wallmann-Sperlich [10]

2000 adults

Mean age = 49,3 (SD = 17,6)

48 % men

CS

Sitting time

Age, gender, education, income

Type of residence, aesthetics, access to park and recreational facilities, distance to local facilities, public transport infrastructure, neighbourhood safety -traffic and crime

 

0.90

Wilson [37]

68 adults

47 % men

CS

Time spent sedentaryO

TV Viewing

Age, education, family income, employment type, levels of PA, anthropometrics

  

0.41

Xie [23]

3016 adults

≥18 years

46 % men

CS

TV Viewing

Age, gender, employment, education, BMI, smoking, alcohol intake, vigorous PA

 

Marital status

0.95

Zolnk [15]

2943 households

25–65 years

CS

Private vehicle commuting time

Income, occupation, gender

Degree of centredness (urban/rural subway)

 

0.68

  1. BMI body mass index, CBD central business district
  2. Study design: CS cross sectional, L longitudinal, O observational, P prospective, Q qualitative, QEX quasi-experimental
  3. aonly study to investigate policy factors: worksite physical activity policy, work place health promotion programme