Skip to main content

Table 2 Zero Inflated Negative Binomial model of total work absence 1994–2008. IRR for women versus men

From: Exposure to different lengths of sick leave and subsequent work absence among young adults

Sick leave 1993

Woman Mean(SD)

Man Mean(SD)

Adjusted IRR Woman vs Man

95 % CI

p-value

0

n = 59814 380 (620)

n = 59876 241 (507)

1.20

1.18–1.22

<.0001

1–7

n = 3241 626 (844)

n = 1599 436 (737)

1.35

1.24–1.47

<.0001

8–14

n = 1440 723 (957)

n = 863 423 (698)

1.52

1.35–1.70

<.0001

15–28

n = 1600 763 (1003)

n = 905 548 (895)

1.28

1.14–1.43

<.0001

29–59

n = 1678 919 (1106)

n = 760 580 (963)

1.36

1.21–1.53

<.0001

60–89

n = 718 1074 (1225)

n = 312 671 (1061)

1.50

1.25–1.79

<.0001

90–119

n = 424 1157 (1246)

n = 166 874 (1296)

1.26

0.99–1.61

0.0649

120–149

n = 201 1596 (1473)

n = 106 851 (1143)

1.81

1.32–2.48

0.0002

150–179

n = 145 1478 (1472)

n = 82 1111 (1388)

1.30

0.91–1.85

0.1493

180–239

n = 181 1998 (1620)

n = 111 1251 (1451)

1.50

1.10–2.04

0.0104

240–299

n = 114 1984 (1602)

n = 65 1858 (1724)

1.13

0.76–1.68

0.5459

330–364

n = 137 2421 (1833)

n = 116 2120 (1740)

1.19

0.87–1.64

0.2812

365

n = 130 3604 (1919)

n = 113 3187 (2010)

1.22

0.88–1.69

0.2380

  1. Adjusted for age, education, origin and county, IRR (Incidence-rate ratio) from the negative binominal part of the model