Skip to main content

Table 2 Linear regression analyses between psychosocial variables and fear-avoidance (X → M)

From: Psychosocial job conditions, fear avoidance beliefs and expected return to work following acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study of fear-avoidance as a potential mediator

 

All

Men

Women

 

β (95 % CI)

p-value

β (95 % CI)

p-value

β (95 % CI)

p-value

Job demand-Control

 Model 1

  High strain

1.4 (1.2–1.6)

<.0001

1.6 (1.3–1.8)

<.0001

1.0 (0.4–1.6)

0.07

  Active

0.6 (0.3–0.9)

0.0002

0.7 (0.4–1.0)

<.0001

0.3 ((−0.6)–1.3)

0.9

  Passive

0.4 (0.2–0.6)

0.02

0.5 (0.2–0.7)

<.0001

0.1 ((−0.6)–0.7)

0.3

  Low strain (REF)

1.0

 

1.0

 

1.0

 

 Model 2

  High strain

1.2 (0.9–1.4)

<.0001

1.3 (1.1–1.6)

<.0001

0.5 ((−0.04)–1.1)

0.07

  Active

0.5 (0.3–0.8)

0.0002

0.6 (0.3–0.9)

<.0001

0.04 ((−0.8)–0.9)

0.9

  Passive

0.3 (0.03–0.5)

0.02

0.4 (0.1–0.6)

0.002

−0.3 ((−0.9)–0.3)

0.3

  Low strain (REF)

1.0

 

1.0

 

1.0

 

Effort-reward imbalance

 Model 1

0.6 (0.5–0.7)

<.0001

0.7 (0.6–0.8)

<.0001

0.6 (0.4–0.8)

<.0001

 Model 2

0.5 (0.4–0.6)

<.0001

0.6 (0.5–0.7)

<.0001

0.4 (0.2–0.6)

0.0003

  1. 95 % CI = 95 % confidence interval
  2. Model 1 Unadjusted; Model 2 Adjusted for Occupational status, self-efficacy and general mental health