Skip to main content

Table 2 Level of community participation in each phase of project development for each study

From: A systematic review of studies evaluating Australian indigenous community development projects: the extent of community participation, their methodological quality and their outcomes

First author (year)

Four phases of project development

Diagnosis

Development

Implementation

Evaluation

Gauld et al. (2011) [40]

1a

2–5b

2–5

5

Green et al. (2009) [67]

4

4

4

UNK

McMurray (2012) [49]

7

6

6

3

Parker et al. (2006) [48]

6

UNK

5

4

Murphy et al. (2004) [41]

3

7

5

4

Hunt (2010a) [59]

7

7

7

6

CLC (2012a) [60]

UNK

UNK

4

3

CLC (2012b) [51]

7

7

7

3/4c

CLC (2012c) [61]

UNK

UNK

UNK

3/4

CLC (2012d) [62]

UNK

3

3

4

CLC (2012e) [63]

UNK

4

UNK

3

Taylor (2005a) [56]

1

UNK

5

4

Taylor (2005b) [64]

UNK

UNK

4

4

Ramsay (2005a) [57]

UNK

UNK

5

4

Ramsay (2005b) [68]

1

3

4

4

Burchill (2005) [65]

UNK

3

4

4

Higgins (2005) [52]

7

7

7

4

Bromfield (2005) [55]

1

5

4

4

Ramsay (2005c) [66]

2

UNK

UNK

4

Tsey (2003) [69]

1

3

4

3

Tsey et al. (2004); [39]

5

6

6

5

Smith (2004) [53]

7

3

6

6

Lee et al. (2008) [42]

UNK

2–5

4–5

4

Tyrrell et al. (2003) [43]

6

6

6

5

Guenther (2011) [58]

UNK

2

5

2

Salisbury (1998) [44]

5

5/6

5/6

6

Hunt (2010b) [59]

1

2

4

5

Moran (2003/2004) [45]

UNK

4

4–1

2

McCalman (2005) [54]

7

7

7

4

Jarvie (2008) [46]

1

5

5

UNK

Shannon et al. (2001) [47]

3

UNK

UNK

3

  1. aPossible scores range from 1 to 7: 1 = no participation; 2 = passive participation; 3 = participation by information; 4 = participation by consultation; 5 = functional participation; 6 = interactive participation; 7 = self-mobilisation, UNK = unknown [32, 34]
  2. bParticipation varied within the phase
  3. cParticipation was somewhere in between these levels