Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the mixed-effects logistic regression analyses for associations between socio-demographic characteristics and protective practices. Only practices associated with at least one statistically significant socio-demographic factor are shown

From: Protective practices against zoonotic infections among rural and slum communities from South Central Chile

Exposure category

Protective practice

Socio-demographic characteristic

Odds ratio (95 % CI)

P-value

Rodents

Extermination

Number of rodent signs

1.75 (1.41–2.16)

<0.01

Community typea

  

Farm areas

2.31 (1.32–4.20)

<0.01

Marginalized urban

0.85 (0.51–1.40)

0.52

Trash disposal

Number of people in household

1.17 (1.02–1.34)

0.03

Occupation

Preventive veterinary care

Number of people in household

1.65 (1.20–2.27)

<0.01

Household has children

0.20 (0.06–0.70)

0.01

Garden

Restricting animal access

Age of head of householdb

1.24 (1.04–1.48)

0.02

Community typea

  

Farm areas

1.97 (1.07–3.63)

0.03

Marginalized urban

0.35 (0.11–1.11)

0.07

Wearing boots

Species diversity

1.27 (1.03–1.56)

0.03

  1. aVillage was used as reference category
  2. bOdds ratio for an increase of 10 years