Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of effects from multi-predictor HLM analyses for predicting CVCT response rates- Rwanda and Zambia

From: Promotion of couples' voluntary counselling and testing for HIV through influential networks in two African capital cities

 

Rwanda

Zambia

 

OR

95% CI

p

OR

95% CI

p

Couple/Invitation Level Predictors

      

   Age of man

1.013

1.006 – 1.024

0.015

1.017

1.007 – 1.025

< .001

Location of invitation*

      

   Couple Home vs. Community

1.262

0.902 – 1.764

0.200

1.596

1.135 – 2.243

0.008

   INA Home vs. Community

3.398

2.150 – 5.368

< .001

3.267

2.174 – 4.909

< .001

   Workplace vs. Community

1.788

1.209 – 2.644

0.004

1.671

1.143 – 2.443

0.008

Person(s) invited

      

   Couple vs. Woman

1.638

1.253 – 2.142

0.001

1.733

1.363 – 2.202

< .001

   Man vs. Woman

1.213

0.940 – 1.566

0.137

1.059

0.841 – 1.334

0.623

Relationship to INA

      

   Family member vs. Just met

1.760

0.844 – 3.672

0.131

1.698

1.110 – 2.599

0.015

   Social acquaint. vs. Just met

1.070

0.842 – 1.358

0.581

1.810

1.395 – 2.347

< .001

Public endorsement

1.756

1.140 – 2.708

0.011

1.705

1.075 – 2.704

0.023

  1. *Workplace = Clinic and Workplace
  2. Community = Church, Market, Social Gathering, and Other