Skip to main content

Table 5 Effect of the migration status and of mediating factors on cardiovascular diseases (Tunisian migrants vs. Tunisians).

From: Influence of socio-economic and lifestyle factors on overweight and nutrition-related diseases among Tunisian migrants versus non-migrant Tunisians and French

Cardiovascular diseases (n = 141 for each group1)

    
  

Adjusted migration status effect

Model number

Variables in models

Odds-Ratios

Confidence Interval

Mediating effect ratio2

p-value

1

Migration status

0.25

0.07–0.88

 

0.03

2

Migration status, Educational status

0.23

0.06–0.86

9%

0.03

3

Migration status, Educational status, Socio-economic index

0.28

0.06–1.26

-18%

0.09

4

Migration status, Educational status, Socio-economic index, Healthcare utilisation index

0.48

0.08–2.69

-42%

0.40

5

Migration status, Educational status, Socio-economic index, Healthcare utilisation index, Physical activity level

0.50

0.08–3.23

-4%

0.46

6

Migration status, Educational status, Socio-economic index, Healthcare utilisation index, Physical activity level , Current smoking

0.46

0.06–3.29

9%

0.44

7

Migration status, Educational status, Socio-economic index, Healthcare utilisation index, Physical activity level, Current smoking, Energy intake

0.69

0.09–5.64

-33%

0.73

8

Migration status, Educational status, Socio-economic index, Healthcare utilisation index, Physical activity level, Current smoking, Energy intake, Alcohol intake

0.69

0.09–5.61

0%

0.73

9

Migration status, Educational status, Socio-economic index, Healthcare utilisation index, Physical activity level, Current smoking, Energy intake, Alcohol intake, Overweight

0.71

0.08–6.48

-3%

0.76

  1. 1. Embedded conditional logistic regression models including only men with no missing value for all variables
  2. 2. Mediating effect ratio was defined as: (OR previous model – OR current model)/OR current model.