Skip to main content

Table 1 Establishment of Vaccine Priority Groups in EUA and GSHAGB countries

From: Prioritization strategies for pandemic influenza vaccine in 27 countries of the European Union and the Global Health Security Action Group: a review

Countries

Source(s) data abstraction included in this review

No. of main groups

Presence of list of subgroups within 3 main groups (Table 2)

Ranking of groups

Ethic committees/consultant involved

Intention to vaccinate whole populationC

Pandemic vaccine priority groupsD

 

Pandemic plan

Email fax

Phone

     

(1) Healthcare workers

(2) Essential service providers

(3) High risk individuals

(4) Healthy adults and childrenE

Other (Table 3) F

ATA

yes

yes

yes

3

no1a

no

yes1b

yes

yes

yes

yes

no

no

BEA

yes

yes

yes

discussion

not applicable

not applicable

no

unknown

     

BGA

yes

yes

no

3

yes

yes

noI

yes3

yes

yes

yes

yes

no

CAB,2

yes

yes

no

5H

yes

yes

noI

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

no

CYA

noG

yes

no

5H

unknown

yes

yes

yes

partly4

yes

yes

yes

no

CZA,

yes

yes5

no

3

yes

unknown

unknown

unknown

yes

yes

yes

no

no

DKA,6

yes

yes

yes

7H

yes

yes, 2 groups6

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

yesJ

no

EEA

yes

yes

no

3

yes

yes

noI

yes

yes

yes

yes

partlyK

yes

FIA,7

noG

yes

no

17

unknown

yes, 1 group7

yes

yes

yes7

no7

no7

no

no

FRA,B,8

yes

yes

yes

3

no

no

no

unknown

yes

yes

yes

no

no

DEA,B

yes

yes

yes

29a

no9b

yes

no

yes

yes

yes

no

no

no

GRA,10

yes

yes

no

510

unknown

discussion10

yes

unknown

yes10

yes10

yes10

no

yes10

HUA

yes

yes

no

3

no

yes

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

no

no

IEA

yes

yes

no

7H

yes

yes

noI

yes

yes

yes

yes

yesJ

yes

ITA,B

yes

yes

no

6H

yes

yes

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

JPB,11

yes

yes

yes

6H

discussion

discussion

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

LVA,12

noG

yes

no

012

not applicable

not applicable

unknown

unknown

     

LTA,13

yes

yes

no

4

yes

discussion

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

no

no

LUA

yes

no

yes

0

not applicable

not applicable

unknown

unknown

     

MTA

no14a

yes

no

8H14b

no

yes

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

MXB,15

noG

yes

no

0

not applicable

not applicable

yes

unknown

     

POA,16

yes

yes

no

2

yes

no

unknown

unknown

yes

yes

yes

partlyK

no

PTA

noG

yes

no

discussion

unknown

discussion

yes

yes

     

ROA

noG

yes

no

5

yes

yes

yes

unknown

yes

yes

yes

partlyK

yes

SKA

yes

yes

no

4

yes

no

no

unknown

yes

yes

yes

no

yes

SIA

noG

yes

no

4

no

yes

noI

unknown

yes

yes

yes

partlyK

no

ESA

yes

yes

no

4H

discussion

yes

no

discussion

yes

yes

yes

yes

no

SEA

yes

yes

no

7H

no

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

NLA

yes

yes

yes

4H

yes

yes

no

yes

yes

no

yes

yes

no

UKA,B,17

yes

yes

no

7H

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yesJ

yes

USB,18

yes

no

yes

4H

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

Summary

23/31 (74%)

29/31 (94%)

9/31 (29%)

26/31 (84%)

14/26 (54%)

17/26 (65%)

10/31 (32%)

19/31 (61%)

26/26 (100%)

24/26 (92%)

24/26 (92%)

13/26 (50%)

11/26 (42%)

  1. A Member State of European Union (EU); B Member of Global Health Security Action Group (GSHAG); C 'yes'indicates that either National Pandemic Plan specifically reports the aim to vaccinate whole population and/or National Pandemic Plan includes 'healthy adults and children' as one of the vaccine priority group(s) and/or country representatives specifically reported this information; 'discussion' indicates country representative specifically reported that vaccination policy is still under discussion, 'unknown' indicates that this item is not specifically reported; D The issue of prioritisation arises only in the situation of vaccine shortage or when vaccines become available over time; E 'yes refers to those countries either specifying 'healthy adults and children' as vaccine priority group(s) and those countries reporting 'offer to all' as vaccine priority group; F Vaccine priority groups that could not be categorized in the four most common vaccine priority groups as described in this table; G National Pandemic Plan available in public domain in language other than English, Danish, Dutch, French, German or Swedish; H Including a category referring to vaccination of whole population; I Ethics considerations will be involved in the future; J Included under the vaccine priority group 'offer to all'; K Countries have included 'children' under 'high risk individuals'
  2. 1a (AT) National Pandemic Plan serves as a framework to guide each of the nine states to develop specific plan including vaccine priority subgroups; 1b No specific ethical committee involved but ethical considerations have been involved;
  3. 2 (CA) Advancements in knowledge and technology are currently being considered by the Pandemic Vaccine Working group and may result in the revision of vaccine priority groups in updated Pandemic Plan in 2007
  4. 3 (BG) Specified in draft national influenza preparedness plan of Bulgaria as "aim is to cover gradually the maximum part of the population";
  5. 4 (CY) Specified as people working in the Health Sector involved with the distribution of vaccines and antivirals;
  6. 5 (CZ) Information received by email is from the unpublished National Pandemic Plan of the Czech Republic 2006;
  7. 6 (DK) Prioritisation of vaccine strategies will be decided during the course of a pandemic, the information in the table reflects the discussion paper in the pandemic plan;
  8. 7 (FI) Irrespective of the virus one vaccine priority group is determined in advance;
  9. 8 (FR) Working groups are updating strategies using pre-pandemic modelling but also accurate survey of the population and age-groups most affected by virus, associated with models of progressive availability of the vaccine in relation with the kinetics of a pandemic will determine the vaccine priority groups;
  10. 9a (DE) Two main vaccine priority groups have been determined, discussion related to criteria of establishing further vaccine priority groups are under discussion 9b National Plan serves as a framework to guide each of the 16 states to develop specific plan including vaccine priority subgroups.
  11. 10 (GR) Is in the process of discussing and further refining vaccine priority groups, the information in the table includes "suggested priority groups" as published in National Pandemic Plan;
  12. 11 (JP) Prioritisation is under discussion and the table includes information in draft guidelines available for public discussion and comments;
  13. 12 (LV) Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Plan of Latvia will be updated in 2007;
  14. 13 (LT) Vaccine priority groups will be revised in the "near future" [as of October 26th 2006];
  15. 14a (MT) National Influenza Pandemic Standing Committee has decided on vaccine priority groups and currently the plan prepared by this committee is being approved and amended by the Director General; 14b Seven of eight reported vaccine priority groups have been categorized under four main categories included in this table;
  16. 15 (MX) Current National Preparedness and Response Plans does not include a scenario in which pandemic vaccine is available; this aspect may be updated as information on vaccine production and availability becomes available.
  17. 16 (PL) More specific and detailed strategy under discussion;
  18. 17 (UK) Plan is currently under revision, including more modelling of immunisation strategies;
  19. 18 (US) Revision of order prioritisation of tiers is expected in spring 2007.