From: Reducing uncertainties in global HIV prevalence estimates: the case of Zambia
Survey/Province | Number with HIV test results* | Percentage with HIV [95% confidence intervals] | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Urban | Rural | Total | Urban | Rural | |
2001–2002 ZDHS Women and men* | |||||
Central | 71 | 234 | 15.4 [12.6–18.6] | 25.4 [18.9–34.0] | 12.4 [9.4–15.7] |
Copperbelt | 627 | 148 | 19.9 [16.6–23.8] | 22.3 [18.5–26.8] | 9.5 [5.0–17.4] |
Eastern | 59 | 411 | 13.8 [10.6–17.6] | 20.3 [11.6–34.5] | 12.7 [9.5–16.8] |
Luapula | 42 | 257 | 11.3 [8.2–15.2] | 21.4 [12.3–36.4] | 9.3 [6.5–13.5] |
Lusaka | 447 | 112 | 22.0 [18.3–26.2] | 23.3 [19.1–28.1] | 17.0 [10.3–26.6] |
Northern | 86 | 431 | 8.3 [6.3–10.8] | 25.6 [17.7–34.8] | 4.9 [3.3–7.2] |
North-Western | 24 | 142 | 9.0 [6.8–12.3] | 16.7 [9.9–28.8] | 7.7 [5.4–11.0] |
Southern | 87 | 321 | 17.6 [14.1–21.8] | 21.8 [14.1–31.8] | 16.5 [12.8–21.2] |
Western | 38 | 267 | 13.1 [9.6–17.6] | 34.2 [19.5–50.8] | 10.1 [7.0–14.7] |
Zambia | 1481 | 2323 | 15.6{15.1} [14.4–16.9] | 23.2{22.8} [20.7–25.6] | 10.8{10.3} [9.6–12.1] |
2001–2002 ANC women | |||||
Central | 497 | 525 | 23.8(25.2) [22.4–25.2] | 28.8 [26.3–31.3] | 21.9 [20.1–23.7] |
Copperbelt | 994 | 393 | 20.1(19.0) [19.1–21.1] | 22.7 [21.3–24.1] | 9.7 [8.8–10.6] |
Eastern | 450 | 523 | 11.9(18.0) [11.2–12.6] | 27.1 [24.6–29.6] | 10.1 [9.3–10.9] |
Luapula | 495 | 802 | 16.8(17.2) [15.9–17.7] | 22.2 [20.3–24.1] | 14.1 [13.2–15.0] |
Lusaka | 2942 | - | 27.2(27.2) [26.2–28.2] | 27.2 [26.2–28.2] | - |
Northern | 519 | 520 | 8.5(12.5) [8.0–9.0] | 18.3 [16.8–19.8] | 6.7 [6.2–7.2] |
North-Western | 495 | 878 | 8.8(10.0) [8.4–9.2] | 13.5 [12.4–14.6] | 8.0 [7.5–8.5] |
Southern | 519 | 520 | 13.6(19.6) [12.8–14.4] | 31.6 [28.9–34.3] | 7.7 [7.1–8.3] |
Western | 494 | 423 | 16.8(23.8) [15.7–17.9] | 31.8 [29.0–34.6] | 14.4 [13.1–15.7] |
Zambia | 7405 | 4584 | 16.9(20.1) [16.6–17.2] | 25.4 [24.8–26.0] | 11.5 [11.2–11.8] |