Categories with their criteria | Before | During (with voucher) | After | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 16 clinics (%)1 | 17 clinics (%)1 | P2 (14 pair) | 15 clinics (%)1 | P3 (12 pair) |
A. Family planning, choice of method | |||||
1. Asks any question on the sexual relationship | 9 (56) | 10.7 (63) | Â | 4 (27) | Â |
2. Presents minimal three contraceptive methods | 12 (75) | 10.6 (62) | 0.09 | 10 (67) | Â |
3. Does not create unnecessary barriers for the use of chosen methods | 12 (75) | 17.0(100) | 0.08 | 10 (67) | Â |
4. Decides on best method together with the girl | 5 (31) | 13.3 (78) | 0.02 | 11 (73) | 0.03 |
5. Patient is satisfied with explanations on FP methods | 5 (31) | 11.3 (67) | Â | 8 (53) | 0.08 |
Score 1 | 5.4 | 7.4 | Â | 5.7 | Â |
B. Family planning, continuity in use | |||||
1. Patient left with a contraceptivemethod/receipt | 8 (50) | 16.0 (94) | 0.01 | 12 (80) | 0.10 |
2. Correct information is given on use of selected method | 10 (62) | 14.7 (86) | Â | 10.5 (70) | Â |
3. New appointment was made | 13 (81) | 16.2 (95) | Â | 7 (47) | 0.08 |
4. Health education material on FP is given | 4.5 (28) | 8.6 (51) | Â | 4.5 (30) | Â |
5. Patient is satisfied with attention doctor | 9.5 (59) | 11.3 (67) | Â | 8.5 (57) | Â |
Score 2 | 5.6 | 7.9 | Â | 5.7 | Â |
C. STI/HIV prevention | |||||
1. Discussed risks STI/HIV | 10.5 (66) | 13.9 (82) | Â | 13.5 (90) | Â |
2. Gave correct information on prevention of STI/HIV | 8 (50) | 11.4 (67) | Â | 12 (80) | 0.10 |
3. Gave health education material | 5 (31) | 11.0 (65) | Â | 3 (20) | Â |
4. Patient satisfied with the explanations | 5 (31) | 8.1 (48) | Â | 6.5 (43) | Â |
5. Promoted the use of condoms | 8.5 (53) | 11.9 (70) | Â | 14 (93) | 0.03 |
6. Asked if patient had other concerns/asked for RTI/STI related complaints | 6.5 (41) | 5.1 (30) | Â | 5 (33) | Â |
Score 3 | 4.5 | 6.0 | Â | 6.0 | Â |
Sum score 1 + 2 + 3 | 15.5 (sd 7.8) | 20.9 (sd 6.9) | Â | 17.4 (sd 7.2) | Â |