Skip to main content

Table 1 Model parameters

From: Comparing the clinical effectiveness of different new-born hearing screening strategies. A decision analysis

Parameter

Base case (in %)

Range for sensitivity analysis

Source

Prevalence of new-born hearing impairment

0.15

0.09–0.3

[3], [28], [29], [4], [30], [31], [25]

Prevalence of one or more risk factors for hearing impairment

20

-

[2, 25, 32]

Prevalence of hearing impairment

 

-

 

In children with risk factors

0.38

-

Author's calculation, [33]

In children without risk factors

0.09

-

Author's calculation

Prevalence of risk factors in children with hearing impairment

50

48–56

[1, 28, 34]

Sensitivity of screening

96

96–100

[11, 32, 35]

Specificity of screening

89

77–96

[11, 32, 35]

Sensitivity of diagnostic testing

98

-

 

Specificity of diagnostic testing

98

-

 

Coverage of screening

90

85–95

Author's estimate

Follow-up after screening

80

75–85

Author's estimate

Healthy children under suspicion of hearing impairment

0.1

-

Author's estimate

Discounting factor

3 per year

0–5

 

Weighs for quality adjustment

   

Time to diagnosis ≤ 6 months of age

1

-

Experts'estimate

Time to diagnosis > 12 months of age

0.875

  

Time to diagnosis > 6 months and ≤ 12 months

linear extrapolation

  

Probability of "natural" discovery without systematic screening

Weibull Distribution Median age at diagnosis 18 months

-

Empirical data *)

  1. *) author's calculations, derived from a representative survey, covering all diagnosed cases and the age of diagnosis in Upper Bavaria in 1998 and 1999 [20]